[rt-devel] Odd behaviour

Jesse jesse at fsck.com
Fri May 25 16:44:59 EDT 2001


Known bug. Ticket #504. will be dealt with once i'm home from travelling.



On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 12:42:16PM -0700, Robert Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:04:41PM +0200, Jonas Liljegren wrote:
> > Feargal Reilly <feargal at online.thecia.ie> writes:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > This is an intentional bug...
> > > 
> > > When you view a ticket, by defalut, the system updates the status to
> > > open if the current status is new, new essentially meaning
> > > 'unread'. This came about as some people pointed out it was silly
> > > having to update status everytime you took a ticket. You just happen
> > > to use RT differently to most.
> > 
> > I would rather have it changing to open only then the ticket is
> > taken.  Not then it's viewed.
> 
> Yes, I agree, this is what I would prefer it do also. I don't see any reason
> to make a ticket open if it has never been "taken". If it hasn't been taken,
> then no-one owns it and therefore, should be considered "new", not "open".
> To me, "open" means that someone now owns the ticket and is working on a
> solution.
> 
> -Robert
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

...realized that the entire structure of the net could be changed to be made 
more efficient, elegant, and spontaneously make more money for everyone 
involved. It's a marvelously simple diagram, but this form doesn't have a way 
for me to draw it.  It'll wait. 				-Adam Hirsch




More information about the Rt-devel mailing list