[rt-devel] hacking on rt.

[Jesse Vincent]

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:26:45PM -0600, Rob Walker wrote:
> On Thursday 07 February 2002 14:07, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> > It depends on what you're doing. ;)  the cvs -head may be better to hack
> > on, as it's easier for me to apply patches against and you get the benefit
> > of the latest code, at the cost of possibly slightly decreased stability
> > and a moving target.
> 
> Aye, there's the rub.  I need stability at this point.

Actually the current -head is, imo, _more_ stable than .11 (which clearly means
it's time to start gearing up for another release ;)

> > I'm currently investigating other version control systems
> > such as arch and bitkeeper, which will make it somewhat easier for sites
> > to maintain their own branches off my repository, which might make
> > things more interesting in the future...
> 
> Sigh, same here.  I am setting up an internet infrastructure for a company I 
> am starting to work with.  We need to implement an VCS, but setting up and 
> training everyone on CVS just feels like such a step backwards.  ugh.

Finding anything interesting besides those I mentioned?

> > So, what are you doing? ;)
> 
> I guess it was wrong to call it 'hacking', 'piddling around' is more like it.
> 
> I am coming at this from a keystone background, you got us because of Dave's 
> suggestion and WhitePJ's brilliant move.  :-)  Here is what I have done so 
> far, little as it is.

Hrm. Have you put any thought/effort into an import tool? 

 
> 1.  The part where we show the current rights is driving me crazy, since it 
> isn't sorted the same way as the "New Rights" listbox is sorted.

There's a patch in the buglist for that.

-- 
http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.