<p>Hi.</p>
<p>As RTIR is already in path of those components then using it name of callbacks is ambiguous. Also, RT uses different naming conventions, usually it's AfterXxx.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">09.09.2010 21:22 пользователь "Richard Harman" <<a href="mailto:rt-devel@richardharman.com">rt-devel@richardharman.com</a>> написал:<br><br>Diff against rtir 2.4-trunk<br>
<a href="http://github.com/warewolf/rtir/commit/f7901605c3a4c639576a56b2c4fb5e598331c675" target="_blank">http://github.com/warewolf/rtir/commit/f7901605c3a4c639576a56b2c4fb5e598331c675</a><br>
<br>
This is some prep work for an extension I will be releasing shortly that adds some better visual organization of custom fields in RTIR.<br>
<br>
This will permit you to add content to the create/edit/display RTIR pages for custom fields in an organized way (rather than a long list of CFs in a "Custom Fields" box).<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
List info: <a href="http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></p>