Chris,<div><br></div><div>That is an interesting idea, though it limits the organization of portlets. Thanks for giving me something to think about though!</div><div><br></div><div>-Todd<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Christian Loos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cloos@netsandbox.de">cloos@netsandbox.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi Todd,<br>
<br>
how about creating a simple portlet and within this you create your<br>
dynamic portlets as "sub portlets".<br>
<br>
-Chris<br>
<br>
Am 30.11.2010 19:50, schrieb Todd Chapman:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> Ruslan,<br>
><br>
> By dynamic I mean that an arbitrary number of portlets would be created<br>
> based on RT configuration. The number of portlets is determined at<br>
> runtime, not install. The portlets would be created with a dhandler.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>