<br>On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:58:17PM -0500, Robert Nesius wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote">
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Dominic Hargreaves <<br>
> <a href="mailto:dominic.hargreaves@oucs.ox.ac.uk">dominic.hargreaves@oucs.ox.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:47:39AM -0400, Kevin Falcone wrote:<br>
> > > If you can get a request-tracker4 packages instead of<br>
> > > request-tracker40/request-tracker42 it would make us all very happy.<br>
> ><br>
> > Could you expand on how that would particularly affect you as<br>
> > upstreams?<br>
> ><br>
><br>
</div>> It implies stable api's and database schemas, yeah? If RT 4.0 is RT 4.2 is<br>
> RT 4.4 is RT4.... I'm expecting upgrades to not cause my database to blow<br>
> up, or even change. I'm not saying my expectations are reasonably informed<br>
> or accurate. I'm just saying that's what I'd instinctively expect. If I'm<br>
> wrong someone set me straight.<br>
<br>I accidentally sent this reply to an individual versus the list earlier.<br><br>-Rob<br><br></div>