[rt-users] Q: Multiple Requestors per Ticket?

[Jesse]

Paul,
	you should be able to simply set up "Requestor" as a comma delimited
list of email addresses.

RT2 contains more explicit support for multiple Requestors, Ccs and
Administrative Ccs.


On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 05:02:07PM -0800, Paul Hirose wrote:
> In short...Is there a way to have multiple "Requestor" email-addresses
> for one ticket in RT-1.0.5?
> 
> In a bit more detail...We have a web-based form which we have our various
> non-support-staff fill out, on behalf of our various customers.  The contents
> are sent via email to RT and assigned to a support-staff member.  The
> difficulty here is, we would like to have both the "non-support-staff" person
> *AND* the "actual customer" to be a "Requestor" and have *BOTH* folks
> get email which is generated as Correspondence occurs on this ticket.
> 
> We don't want to make every non-support-staff member a member of the
> support queue.  Certainly, we don't want the customer to be a member of
> the support queue either.  We only want them to get the email as our
> support staff respond and handle the ticket.
> 
> I've tried a variety of things...I've set our CGI Script (in Perl) which
> takes the form and turns it in to email to have our Reply-To: header
> contain *both* the email address of our non-support-staff and the
> customer.  I've tried entering one as Reply-To: and the other as a CC:.
> I've tried entering both as CC: and Reply-To: and so on.  
> 
> Judging by its actions, it appears that RT collects from the various
> mail headers, the first address that it sees, using Reply-To: as its
> first preference, then From:, then Sender:.  I don't mind its priorities,
> I just want it to handle more than one entry in its database for Requestor.
> 
> Has anyone made a change for this, or am I missing some configuration option?
> I'll be happy to hack out some code if that's what it takes (I'm guessing)
> if someone could point me in roughly the right direction :)
> 
> I know this was possible using Req-1.2.7...most likely out of sheer
> coincidence, but possible nonetheless (we constructed the header as
>  "Reply-To: nonsupportstaff,customer" and it worked w/Req-1.2.7)
> 
> Willing to experiment...please feel free to drop me a note and I'll be
> happy to summarize for general archival to the list (or just reply to
> the list, I just subscribed.)
> 
> Thanks all...
> PH
> 
> -- 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Paul Hirose -- phirose at sac.verio.net		Voice: 916-856-1530
> Verio, the new world of business	 	Fax:   916-856-1540
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more 
than 10 seconds continuously."
					-Nathan Mehl