[rt-users] Any advantage to using the other mysql tabletypes? (bdb, innodb) with RT?

Matthew Watson mwatson at office.netspace.net.au
Thu Jul 11 17:22:34 EDT 2002


I have the same problem (although i've given mysql enough memory so
it doesn't hit the disk. and trust me, You cannot train
users not to run certain queries :) If the option is there they
will use it, I had to take it away :)

Mat.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
> [mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com]On Behalf Of Jaye Mathisen
> Sent: Friday, 12 July 2002 4:12 AM
> To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> Subject: [rt-users] Any advantage to using the other mysql tabletypes?
> (bdb, innodb) with RT?
>
>
>
> Just curious.  I'm seeing a lot of "Copying tmp table to disk"
> that hold up my
> RT install for 2-3 minutes at  a time.  WHile I know specifically
> what causes it and can train my users to not run that set of queries, I"m
> just wondering if using different table types and transaction stuff might
> let mysql run the other pending queries from other RT users...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm





More information about the rt-users mailing list