[rt-users] FastCGI vs. mod_perl (not mod_ssl)

Gororo, Hillary HGororo at chartercom.com
Tue Apr 29 13:50:36 EDT 2003


I am also very interested in learning whether there are any performance /
speed advantages in using FastCGI instead of mod_perl with RT2 or RT3.

Thanks

Hillary

-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Szucs [mailto:mick at onramp.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 12:44 PM
To: John Gedeon
Cc: 'rt-users at lists.fsck.com'
Subject: Re: [rt-users] FastCGI vs. mod_perl (not mod_ssl)


On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 13:36, John Gedeon wrote:
> >Can anyone tell me (from their own experience or otherwise) whether or
> >not there is a noticeable performance difference between running RT
> >under FastCGI vs mod_ssl?
> 
> mod_ssl doesn't run cgi programs it is for running a secure web server
> 
> ie if you wanted to use RT on an ssl aware apache server you would have to

> have both
> FastCGI and mod_ssl.
> 
> I think you may be thinking of mod_perl not mod_ssl.

Right .. mod_perl.  Sorry 'bout that folks, hadn't consumed the
appropriate amount of caffeine prior to posting :)

Thanks,

Mick

_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm



More information about the rt-users mailing list