[rt-users] Apache 2.x vs 1.x - and external auth

[Greg.Hering at bench.com]

What I would really like to see is a matrix of configurations.  Known good OSs, RTs, Apaches, perl and modules.

It would require 
	- someone to host it, 
	- someone to write the code (or some freeware) to make it available and last but not least 
	- a plethora of users submitting their configurations

The user input is where this sort of thing usually falls apart.  This list is great and there are quite a few generous supporters, but the output is only as valid as the input that is sent in.

Anyone feel inspired?

Gregory L. Hering
(256) 722-6420
4807 Bradford Dr
Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
Hunvtsville, Al 35805
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Spier [mailto:rspier at pobox.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 7:23 PM
To: Mike Patterson
Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Apache 2.x vs 1.x - and external auth

> My assumptions:
> 1) Apache 2.x handles external LDAP authentication better (or at least 
> it is easier to set up) than Apache 1.x.

Maybe.  

> 2) mod_perl isn't ready for Apache 2.x

This is more of "mod_perl2 is not compatible with mod_perl1, and RT is
written against mod_perl1"

> 3) fastcgi could work with Apache 2.x to support RT 3.x ?

Yes.  I do this.

> The game plan:
> Install apache 2.x with https: and fastcgi with postgresql on a redhat 
> 9.0 system (installing apache from src instead of rpms). 

Yes. 

-R
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm