[rt-users] Package permissions [PATCH]

[Ruslan U. Zakirov]

clean, just untared ball, before configure:
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic 18036 Ноя 26 06:32 rt-setup-database
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic 18030 Ноя 26 06:32 rt-setup-database.in
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic  5804 Фев 13 21:21 rt-test-dependencies
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic  5797 Фев 13 21:21 rt-test-dependencies.in

after configure
-rw-rw-r--   1 cubic cubic 18036 Май 17 16:03 rt-setup-database
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic 18030 Ноя 26 06:32 rt-setup-database.in
-rw-rw-r--   1 cubic cubic  5804 Май 17 16:03 rt-test-dependencies
-rwxr-x--x   1 cubic cubic  5797 Фев 13 21:21 rt-test-dependencies.in

permissions are broken. it isn't big trouble couse you always can use 
`perl rt-setup-database`

pathc attached which fix this for you and other. I don't how it was 
working in old versions.

FYI, there is upcoming 3.0.11 soon.

			Best regards. Ruslan.


Peter Jamriško wrote:
> If you unpack 3.0.9 or 3.0.8. or 3.0.6 version of RT, you will see no x 
> flag in any file under /sbin directory. Only in rt 3.0.10 there are 
> files in /sbin directory with x flag already set. May be ./configure 
> script does just reverse change of x flag and not change from "non-x" to 
> "x". It means that if I run ./configure, it will only change x flag for 
> files "rt-setup-database" and "rt-test-dependencies" from "x" to 
> "non-x". Size and file names of all the files under /sbin will be the 
> same as befor "./configure".
> 
> Is there anybody who can just unpack rt-3.0.10 and run ./configure  and 
> then try to check file permission on "/sbin/rt-test-dependencies" fiel, 
> if it has "x" flag?
> 
> Thanks.
> Peter
> 
> Ruslan U. Zakirov wrote:
> 
>> Peter Jamriško wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I ungzipped, untarred the rt-3.0.10.tar.gz file, then i ran 
>>> "./configure --with-db-port=3306 --with-web-user=apache 
>>> --with-web-group=apache". Then i tried to run "perl 
>>> sbin/rt-test-dependencies --with-mysql --with-fastcgi", but there is 
>>> not execute permission on the "rt-test-dependencies" file. I 
>>> downloaded rt-3.0.9.tar.gz (3.0.8 too)and unpacked them. In this 
>>> packages are the same files, but with reverse execute permissions. Is 
>>> this ok, or do i have to run "rt-test-dependencies.in" instead.
>>
>>
>> You don't want to run *.in files. If your `rt-test-dependencies.in` 
>> has x flag but rt-test-dependencies has no then something wrong with 
>> configure script because it should preserve permissions when do 
>> *.in->* convertion.
>>
>>             Best regards, Ruslan.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for help.
>>>
>>> Peter.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>>>
>>> RT Developer and Administrator training is coming to LA, DC and 
>>> Frankfurt this spring and summer.
>>> http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html
>>>
>>> Sign up early, as class space is limited.
>>
>>
>>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cofnfigure_preserve_x_flag.patch
Type: application/aegis-patch
Size: 353 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20040517/463ecedc/attachment.bin>