[rt-users] FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127

Indika Wasala indika at hsenid.lk
Wed Nov 3 20:48:22 EST 2004


Yes. I am logged in as administrator and owner of rt-mailgate.conf is
also administrator (changed it from administrators to administrator) but
still no luck. :-(

Regards,
Indika.

On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 04:55, Craig Ducharme wrote:
> Indika, 
> 
> Are you logged in as Administrator when you execute rt-mailgate?
> Ownership of rt-mailgate.conf needs to be that of the user executing
> rt-mailgate. 
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Craig Ducharme
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-bounces at lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Indika
> Wasala
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:10 AM
> To: rt-users at lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: [rt-users] FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I have successfully installed rt-3.0.11.exe from
> http://p4.elixus.org/dist/ in a Windows 2000 advanced server machine and
> everything works fine except fetchmail which comes with the
> distribution. 
> 
> When I ran rt-mailgate shortcut I get the following error message after
> successfully login into the mail server,
> 
> FETCHM~1: MDA returned nonzero status 127
> not flushed
> 
> I changed the owner of the file rt-mailgate.conf to the administrator
> and replaced the cygwin1.dll file (in bin folder) with a latest version
> (1005.9.0.0 with 1005.11.0.0 - got this trick from a mailing list) but
> still get the above error.
> 
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Be sure to check out the RT wiki at http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> 
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. 
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> 
> 
> 




More information about the rt-users mailing list