[rt-users] Search on merged ticket differs between 3.4.5 & 3.6.0

[Jesse Vincent]

(I'm pretty sure I did say this was  bug the other day ;)

Patches are certainly welcome, if anyone wants to beat me to it.



On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:39:04PM -0700, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> I agree wholeheartedly.
> 
> Kenn
> LBNL
> 
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> >On Jul 17, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> >
> >>    Not to say 3.6.0 is perfect, but we like the current design as far 
> >>as merged tickets. If we have merged the two (using your example of 
> >>#100 and #200), then #100 really should never be looked at anyway, 
> >>other than what was originally appended to #200. We really don't want 
> >>anyone looking at #100 anymore,
> >
> >The old behavior was that if you searched on ticket 100, it would show 
> >you ticket 200.  This is the only sensible behavior :-)
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
> >Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> >Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> >Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
> >Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> >
> >
> >We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: 
> >http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: sales at bestpractical.com
> 
> 
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. 
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
> 
> 
> We're hiring! Come hack Perl for Best Practical: 
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
> 

--