[rt-users] Forcing a custom field to be a mandatory date

Kenneth Crocker kfcrocker at lbl.gov
Fri Apr 15 15:00:57 EDT 2011


Kevin,

OK. Got it. Thanks for your time on this.

Kenn
LBNL

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Kevin Falcone
<falcone at bestpractical.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:51:34AM -0700, Kenneth Crocker wrote:
> >    I thought I had read somewhere that 3.8.8 had a Custom Field type
> option for Dates. I was
> >    hoping this was true so I could throw away the Custom Code I am using
> that was contributed by
> >    Emmanuel Lacour. Right now, the code works pretty well, other than I
> have no options to format
> >    the data to be consistent with my date formatting preferences for
> other date fields.
>
> This is not the case
>
> >    If this is NOT the case, are there any plans to put the RT 4 code into
> 3.8.10?
>
> This code has not been backported to 3.8 and is unlikely to be
> backported since it was quite a bit of work to get right for 4.
>
> -kevin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20110415/279eb102/attachment.htm>


More information about the rt-users mailing list