[rt-users] User email address bug(s)

[David Chandek-Stark]

Users were not merged.  Disabling extension resolves issue (although can
still create new user with leading space in email).  I will try upgrading
extension.

Thanks,
David

On 8/30/11 10:47 AM, "Kevin Falcone" <falcone at bestpractical.com> wrote:

>On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:34:11PM +0000, David Chandek-Stark wrote:
>> RT 3.8.5
>> RT::Extension::MergeUsers 0.03
>> 
>> I have confirmed a case with this setup as follows:
>> 
>> User A - relevant history
>>   - Tue Dec 07 13:43:34 2010 RT_System - User created
>>   - Fri Aug 12 13:50:22 2011 RT_System - EmailAddress changed from
>> 'user at example.com' to ''
>> 
>> User B - relevant history
>>   - Fri Aug 12 13:50:12 2011 privuser - User created
>>   - Fri Aug 12 13:50:22 2011 privuser - EmailAddress changed from '
>> user at example.com' to 'user at example.com'
>
>Presumably you've merged User A and User B?  Or is this a bug you see
>with unmerged users?  What happens when you disable the extension?
>
>> User B's email not only was allowed to be created with a leading space,
>> but was then allowed to be changed to a value already in use by User A
>>--
>> and set A's email to "0" (presumably
>> http://issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=15024).
>> 
>> Are these known bugs with RT 3.8.5 and/or MergeUsers 0.03?  I am
>>planning
>> to upgrade RT and MergeUsers, but would like to know what's going on
>>here.
>
>There were a large number of bugfixes in MergeUser 0.04, released last
>year.
>
>There have also been a large number of bugfixes since 3.8.5 was
>released 2 years ago.
>
>I've not seen your specific bug reported.
>
>-kevin
>--------
>RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
>*  Chicago, IL, USA — September 26 & 27, 2011
>*  San Francisco, CA, USA — October 18 & 19, 2011
>*  Washington DC, USA — October 31 & November 1, 2011
>*  Melbourne VIC, Australia — November 28 & 29, 2011
>*  Barcelona, Spain — November 28 & 29, 2011