[rt-users] Problems with new users

Kevin Falcone falcone at bestpractical.com
Tue Feb 14 17:44:31 EST 2012


On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:36:19PM -0500, Scott Pestana wrote:
>     That's correct, we don't want him to have special privileges;
> other than the ability to see status of tickets that he
> opened/requested.  Oddly enough we have another employee who started
> at roughly the same time as Ian, and Tracy doesn't have this issue,
> nor does she have an un-privileged Privileged User.  When she logs
> in she gets a view similar to mine (I'm on IT Support, have
> privileges, and haven't had an issue).  At least that's what my
> memory tells me.  I'm going to check on this tomorrow to see what
> her experience as a user is, I could be wildly wrong about this.

This sounds like you may want this user to just be Unprivileged and
use the SelfService interface.  You'll still need to hand out some
rights so that Requestors can see their own tickets, etc.

However, you can go compare this user and Tracy's group memberships
from the Memberships tab on their user page and I suspect Tracy will
be in groups and Ian isn't or that Tracy has tickets requested but Ian
doesn't.  Also, if Ian's user record had no Email Address then RT has
no way to associate his tickets with the logged in user (See my later
comment about how RT can't know the user's email address).

>     When he logs in and goes to the "RT at a glance" page (
> rt/index.html ), his view (to me) implies he's associated with a
> queue that was originally set up for testing.

What about it makes you think he is accessing a testing queue?
It just sounds like he has no rights in the system.

>     I'm not sure I understand it either. ;)  We are using a rather
> complex set up with apache spread across multiple servers performing
> different roles, all united by SSO on the apache instance acting as
> a gateway.  The credentials are (I believe) passed through so an
> employee only needs to authenticate once for all of our internal
> resources.  We are also getting closer to using Kerberos/Domain
> authentication for seamless SSO for our windows users.

That makes more sense, you're authing with SSO and trying to pull
information from LDAP.  However, your LDAP is keyed to look up on
email address and when someone logs in via the web UI, there's no way
to have their email address (think about it, RT only gets the username
they logged in with, not their email address which is stored in LDAP).
Often, ExternalAuth is keyed to look up on Username *and*
EmailAddress, but yours is configured for just EmailAddress.

>     Based on this I think our issues stem from him logging in via
> the web before opening a ticket via email.  Funnily enough when he
> emailed IT support for help with something around the office, the RT
> system worked like a charm.  I'm starting to think I may be
> over-thinking this entire situation...

This also supports my above comment, since someone emailing into your
system *would* be able to find their LDAP account, because RT has
their email account.

It sounds like many of these problems could be solved with
RT-Extension-LDAPImport pulling users into the system so they'll exist
before sending email or logging into the system.

-kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20120214/10b3ebfa/attachment.sig>


More information about the rt-users mailing list