<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>AW: Re: [rt-users] RT bottlenecks</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hi matthew,<BR>
Me too, if you have something, pls share.<BR>
<BR>
Does anyone have something to cleanly monitor the rt performance? Response times etc? We are using a scrip at this moment which does a wget and this pain in the ass.<BR>
<BR>
Any idea is welcome<BR>
<BR>
Torsten<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: rt-users-bounces@lists.bestpractical.com <rt-users-bounces@lists.bestpractical.com><BR>
To: Mathew <theillien@yahoo.com><BR>
CC: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com <rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com><BR>
Sent: Fri Sep 28 17:51:30 2007<BR>
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT bottlenecks<BR>
<BR>
Matthew;<BR>
If you have any benchmarking techniques , can you share them please I'll<BR>
be interested in how to monitor RT activities.<BR>
Regards;<BR>
Roy<BR>
<BR>
Mathew wrote:<BR>
> Version 3.6.1 actually. I'll give it a try though and see what happens.<BR>
> I know there is a benchmarking method that was explained in the RT<BR>
> training I attended so I'll look in my documentation and see what I find<BR>
> for that.<BR>
><BR>
> Keep up with my goings on at <A HREF="http://theillien.blogspot.com">http://theillien.blogspot.com</A><BR>
><BR>
> Roy El-Hames wrote:<BR>
> <BR>
>> Matthew;<BR>
>> What version of RT are you using?<BR>
>> With > 3.6.1, I noticed slowness with transaction custom fields queries,<BR>
>> if you do not use them try and comment out the following lines from<BR>
>> html/Ticket/Elements/ShowTransaction<BR>
>><BR>
>> %# if ($Transaction->CustomFieldValues->Count) {<BR>
>> %# <& /Elements/ShowCustomFields, Object => $Transaction &><BR>
>> %#}<BR>
>><BR>
>> You may find tickets display quicker --but again do this if you do not<BR>
>> use Transaction CF's--<BR>
>><BR>
>> Regards;<BR>
>> Roy<BR>
>><BR>
>> Mathew wrote:<BR>
>> <BR>
>>> I've been informed that some are beginning to complain about the speed<BR>
>>> of RT when it comes to loading tickets that contain attachments. This<BR>
>>> has led to the question of distributed computing in the way of load<BR>
>>> balancing. I'd like to avoid moving in this direction with RT as we<BR>
>>> don't have the need for it. Our user base is small as is our ticket<BR>
>>> count.<BR>
>>><BR>
>>> It would seem that most of the bottleneck comes from actually loading<BR>
>>> the page. I've found that tickets with numerous transactions (exact<BR>
>>> number not known) tend to be slow to load even without attachments.<BR>
>>><BR>
>>> How should I go about pinpointing the bottleneck so I can find a<BR>
>>> solution that won't require a major tech refresh?<BR>
>>><BR>
>>><BR>
>>> Mathew<BR>
>>> <BR>
>>> <BR>
>> <BR>
><BR>
> <BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users">http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users</A><BR>
<BR>
Community help: <A HREF="http://wiki.bestpractical.com">http://wiki.bestpractical.com</A><BR>
Commercial support: sales@bestpractical.com<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.<BR>
Buy a copy at <A HREF="http://rtbook.bestpractical.com">http://rtbook.bestpractical.com</A><BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>