On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Atro Tossavainen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:atossava@cc.helsinki.fi">atossava@cc.helsinki.fi</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I was wondering if anybody has already dealt with the issue of RT either<br>
autoresponding to all incoming messages or not autoresponding to any at<br>
all. Specifically, I'd like to try to implement recommendations of RFC<br>
3834 in the autoresponder - such as, if RT gets mail from another auto-<br>
responder that is easily identifiable as such, to stop generating loops.<br>
Any pointers will be welcome.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Atro Tossavainen (Mr.) </blockquote><div><br>Not sure if I remember this correctly, but autoresponse e-mails should have/contain a header with something like "Precedence: bulk".<br>I am not sure what it is between bulk|junk|list, but given that, you can check for the existence of that header in your MTA or procmail rule and stop that mail from getting to RT.<br>
<br>My RT usage knowledge is quite rusty after over 1 year not using it, so you'll excuse me. I am just catching up. There might be other elegant ways than this.<br><br><br></div></div>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Odhiambo WASHINGTON,<br>
Nairobi,KE<br>+254733744121/+254722743223<br>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br>"Okay guys. This is Kenya. You pay taxes because you feel philanthropic, unlike our MPs!"<br> -- Kenneth Marende, Speaker, 10th Parilament.<br>