<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Howard,<br>
<br>
I thought the "replace-relations" was for links to other tickets. If it
offers an opportunity to enter a replacement User ID, then I'm sure
it's OK.<br>
<br>
Kenn<br>
LBNL<br>
<br>
On 10/15/2009 9:01 AM, Howard Jones wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4AD74756.6000904@thingy.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 15/10/2009 16:41, Ken Crocker wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Some users may be referred to by transaction history of a ticket
because they sent in corresponance or were the original requestor or
owner. Those kind of relationships shouldn't be deleted because it
will cause an error in yoiur history display.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Isn't that what replace_relations is supposed to fix?
Regards,
Howard
_______________________________________________
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users">http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users</a>
Community help: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.bestpractical.com">http://wiki.bestpractical.com</a>
Commercial support: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sales@bestpractical.com">sales@bestpractical.com</a>
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://rtbook.bestpractical.com">http://rtbook.bestpractical.com</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>