<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Alex Decalli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alexdecalli71@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexdecalli71@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Thanks. In sites-available/default file, I see almost everything is the default and untouched. It is included in apache.conf, BUT the following line which seems to make apache to use mod_perl is commented:<br>
<br></div>#Include /etc/request-tracker3.8/apache2-modperl2.conf<br><br></div>How can I make sure that apache is already using modperl? is there any test or something? and should I uncomment this line? (coz it seems I should...)<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>look for the error.log or like for apache. There should be a line that will tell you all these. You could restart apache2 and check the log again to find out</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Dominic Hargreaves <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dominic.hargreaves@it.ox.ac.uk" target="_blank">dominic.hargreaves@it.ox.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In Debian systems the main configuration file is /etc/apache2/apache2.conf.<br>
(/etc/apache2/httpd.conf is mostly deprecated and has been removed<br>
completely in Debian 7 (wheezy)).<br>
<br>
Typically mod_perl will be enabled via symlinks in<br>
/etc/apache2/mods-enabled but you should ready apache2.conf and look in<br>
the directories referenced by any Include directives.<br>
<br>
The Debian packages recommend that you include Apache configuration<br>
snippets from /etc/request-tracker4.<br>
<br>
Dominic.<br>
<div><br>
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Alex Decalli wrote:<br>
> Thanks, apparently I got it:<br>
><br>
> dpkg -l | grep libapache2-mod-perl2<br>
> ii libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.4-7ubuntu1<br>
> Integration of perl with the Apache2 web server<br>
><br>
> I don't know if I should ask this in another message or it is OK to ask<br>
</div>> here, but there is *NOTHING* in httpd conf file on this server, I mean it<br>
<div><div>> is empty, I have been reading this page:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/ManualApacheConfig" target="_blank">http://requesttracker.wikia.com/wiki/ManualApacheConfig</a><br>
><br>
> and it says they should be configured, so where else might the<br>
> administrator have configured it? do u have any idea? (and apache2.conf<br>
> just includes httpd.conf and nothing else...)<br>
><br>
> And please tell me if I should ask it in separate message<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Dominic Hargreaves <<br>
> <a href="mailto:dominic.hargreaves@it.ox.ac.uk" target="_blank">dominic.hargreaves@it.ox.ac.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > The package you're looking for is libapache2-mod-perl2.<br>
> ><br>
> > Cheers,<br>
> > Dominic.<br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 08:44:28AM +0200, Alex Decalli wrote:<br>
> > > Oh my God, I think it doesn't use mod_perl either! Is it possible to work<br>
> > > without them? I am doing this:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > dpkg -l | grep mod_perl<br>
> > ><br>
> > > And I have nothing! Is it the way I should check?<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Alex Decalli <<a href="mailto:alexdecalli71@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexdecalli71@gmail.com</a><br>
> > >wrote:<br>
> > ><br>
> > > > Apparently it is using mod_perl (I read it is either fast CGI or<br>
> > mod_perl,<br>
> > > > so this should be mod_perl). And about proxy, honestly, I don't know. I<br>
> > > > have been working on this server for like 4 days, years ago, someone<br>
> > else<br>
> > > > had run it and he has left so we have no info. Does it cause problem?<br>
> > How<br>
> > > > can I check if it is using proxy? I look for it while I am waiting for<br>
> > your<br>
> > > > replies, we have problem in response time and this might be the reason.<br>
> > > > Please send me if you know something and tell me how to check if<br>
> > there's a<br>
> > > > proxy being used, I am also newbie in RT.<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Ruslan Zakirov <<a href="mailto:ruz@bestpractical.com" target="_blank">ruz@bestpractical.com</a><br>
> > >wrote:<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Alex Decalli <<a href="mailto:alexdecalli71@gmail.com" target="_blank">alexdecalli71@gmail.com</a><br>
> > >wrote:<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >>> Hi.<br>
> > > >>> We already don't use fastCGI, I want to know will the response time<br>
> > of<br>
> > > >>> RT through web increases if we use it? I'd appreciate if you can<br>
> > send me a<br>
> > > >>> document that can explain about it, I have been looking for it, and<br>
> > I don't<br>
> > > >>> find any answer :)<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> What do you use instead? mod_perl? Do you have proxy in front of it?<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >>> Regards<br>
> > > >>><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >><br>
> > > >> --<br>
> > > >> Best regards, Ruslan.<br>
> > > >><br>
> > > ><br>
> > > ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > Dominic Hargreaves, Systems Development and Support Section<br>
> > IT Services, University of Oxford, 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN<br>
> ><br>
<br>
--<br>
Dominic Hargreaves, Systems Development and Support Section<br>
IT Services, University of Oxford, 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Asif Iqbal<br>PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: <a href="http://pgp.mit.edu">pgp.mit.edu</a><br>A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.<br>
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?<br><br>
</div></div>