[SearchBuilder-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Pages fixes and tests for it functionality

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Thu Jul 28 12:33:02 EDT 2005


> >    * the class here is a Class::Accessor.  We might want to do that
> > for Jifty::DBI too, although we might not like having methods named
> > get and set show up.
> -1 for Class::Accessor, just don't like this solution.
> 
Why not? We've been having a lot of luck with how much cleaner it makes
code feel. And it's relatively fast.

Jesse


More information about the SearchBuilder-devel mailing list