On 3/7/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Kevin Li</b> <<a href="mailto:Kevin.Li@active.com">Kevin.Li@active.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="ZH-CN">
<div style=""><p style="text-align: left;" align="left"><font face="SimSun" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: SimSun;" lang="EN-CA">Svk
cp //mirror //local</span></font></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="left"><font face="SimSun" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: SimSun;" lang="EN-CA">then
we got a copy of the mirror //local, and we use this copy as a server in Xi'an. So developers in Xi'an will checkout from
here and commit to //local.</span></font></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="left"><font face="SimSun" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: SimSun;" lang="EN-CA">Then
maybe in the evening when developer go back, we will do smerge of //mirror and
//local.</span></font></p></div></div></blockquote></div>I'm not sure about answers to all of your questions, but I think it's "standard practice" to "svk push //local" rather than smerge between the two.
<br><br>I don't know the operational differences between the two though. :-|<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Orlock Blackraven<br>(<a href="mailto:orlockblackraven@gmail.com">orlockblackraven@gmail.com</a>)