[Rt-commit] rt branch, 4.0/config-loc, created. rt-4.0.1rc1-8-gf40cc8d

[Shawn Moore]

The branch, 4.0/config-loc has been created
        at  f40cc8d5741876c211a071d6b57b1560281a2e03 (commit)

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit f40cc8d5741876c211a071d6b57b1560281a2e03
Author: Shawn M Moore <sartak at bestpractical.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 1 12:28:51 2011 -0400

    loc_pair lifecycles labels
    
        This fixes http://issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=17540
    
        However, I wish I didn't have to reformat the code to get loc_pair to
        target the correct strings. Just adding "# loc_pair" comments is not
        enough, since the "parser" in extract-message-catalog can't handle
        statements this complex. Furthermore, we do not want to loc either
        part of the "update => 'Respond'" pair.

diff --git a/etc/RT_Config.pm.in b/etc/RT_Config.pm.in
index 1bbca11..6b885c4 100755
--- a/etc/RT_Config.pm.in
+++ b/etc/RT_Config.pm.in
@@ -2258,19 +2258,49 @@ Set(%Lifecycles,
             '* -> *'        => 'ModifyTicket',
         },
         actions => [
-            'new -> open'      => { label => 'Open It',  update => 'Respond' },
-            'new -> resolved'  => { label => 'Resolve',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'new -> rejected'  => { label => 'Reject',   update => 'Respond' },
-            'new -> deleted'   => { label => 'Delete'                        },
-
-            'open -> stalled'  => { label => 'Stall',    update => 'Comment' },
-            'open -> resolved' => { label => 'Resolve',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'open -> rejected' => { label => 'Reject',   update => 'Respond' },
-
-            'stalled -> open'  => { label => 'Open It'                       },
-            'resolved -> open' => { label => 'Re-open',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'rejected -> open' => { label => 'Re-open',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'deleted -> open'  => { label => 'Undelete'                      },
+            'new -> open'      => {
+                label  => 'Open It', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+            'new -> resolved'  => {
+                label  => 'Resolve', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'new -> rejected'  => {
+                label  => 'Reject', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+            'new -> deleted'   => {
+                label  => 'Delete', # loc_pair
+            },
+
+            'open -> stalled'  => {
+                label  => 'Stall', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'open -> resolved' => {
+                label  => 'Resolve', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'open -> rejected' => {
+                label  => 'Reject', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+
+            'stalled -> open'  => {
+                label  => 'Open It', # loc_pair
+            },
+            'resolved -> open' => {
+                label  => 'Re-open', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'rejected -> open' => {
+                label  => 'Re-open', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'deleted -> open'  => {
+                label  => 'Undelete', # loc_pair
+            },
         ],
     },
 # don't change lifecyle of the approvals, they are not capable to deal with
@@ -2302,19 +2332,49 @@ Set(%Lifecycles,
             '* -> *'        => 'ModifyTicket',
         },
         actions => [
-            'new -> open'      => { label => 'Open It',  update => 'Respond' },
-            'new -> resolved'  => { label => 'Resolve',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'new -> rejected'  => { label => 'Reject',   update => 'Respond' },
-            'new -> deleted'   => { label => 'Delete'                        },
-
-            'open -> stalled'  => { label => 'Stall',    update => 'Comment' },
-            'open -> resolved' => { label => 'Resolve',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'open -> rejected' => { label => 'Reject',   update => 'Respond' },
-
-            'stalled -> open'  => { label => 'Open It'                       },
-            'resolved -> open' => { label => 'Re-open',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'rejected -> open' => { label => 'Re-open',  update => 'Comment' },
-            'deleted -> open'  => { label => 'Undelete'                      },
+            'new -> open'      => {
+                label  => 'Open It', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+            'new -> resolved'  => {
+                label  => 'Resolve', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'new -> rejected'  => {
+                label  => 'Reject', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+            'new -> deleted'   => {
+                label  => 'Delete', # loc_pair
+            },
+
+            'open -> stalled'  => {
+                label  => 'Stall', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'open -> resolved' => {
+                label  => 'Resolve', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'open -> rejected' => {
+                label  => 'Reject', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Respond',
+            },
+
+            'stalled -> open'  => {
+                label  => 'Open It', # loc_pair
+            },
+            'resolved -> open' => {
+                label  => 'Re-open', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'rejected -> open' => {
+                label  => 'Re-open', # loc_pair
+                update => 'Comment',
+            },
+            'deleted -> open'  => {
+                label  => 'Undelete', # loc_pair
+            },
         ],
     },
 );

-----------------------------------------------------------------------