[rt-devel] Progress report

[Jesse]

Heya blue. The web ui is still well, not done yet.

I'll see what I can do about dropping 1.3.7 today.

http://www.fsck.com/~jesse/rt2.html is a snapshot of the 
web display ui..it's by no means complete, but it's a start.

FWIW, the 1.1 tree became the 1.3 tree. So, 1.3.x is the current development
branch.  What sorts of things are you adding to 1.0 for work?

	Jesse

On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:56:29PM -0400, Blue Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2000, Tobias Brox wrote:
> 
> > It's probably tons and tons of important things I have forgotten and/or
> > that won't work and that will show up in the near future.  Maybe most
> > important (for most people) is the ACLs, the admin tools and the rt 1.0 ->
> > rt 2.0 migration tool (I hope to build it bidirectionally, but I'm not
> > sure I will have time for it).
> 
> heya folks,
> 
> i have been hacking away at rt 1.0 for a few weeks now.. i would like to
> see what 1.1 looks like, as far as the webui goes. does anyone have a url
> to a publicly viewable copy of it running anywhere?
> 
> i just downloaded 1.3.6 (?) from the ftp site, (no cvs behind our
> broken-ass firewall :( ) and i'm ecstatic to see you're using mason.. the
> code in general looks a lot more clean.
> 
> in any case, if we (the company i work for) move up to 1.1, you'll have
> another at-work hacker for it.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -- 
>         Blue Lang                              Unix Systems Admin
>         QSP, Inc., 3200 Atlantic Ave, Ste 100, Raleigh, NC, 27604
>         Home: 919 835 1540  Work: 919 875 6994  Fax: 919 872 4015
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent --- root at eruditorum.org --- jesse at fsck.com 
pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
-------------------------------------------------------------
Transporters are so ungodly.  if god had wanted us to travel great distances
instantaneously, he would have given us an internal 
materialisation/dematerialisation control.
			  -- Shoshe Cole