[rt-devel] request for Makefile feature
feargal at thecia.ie
Tue Jul 24 12:14:03 EDT 2001
I hate say it, but the README is pretty clear - Upgrading is step 5b - you shouldn't be there without checking all the preceding steps first.
Upgrades mean changes - *always* find out what those changes are before committing to them.
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:53:47 -0700
Robert Shaw <rshaw at mxim.com> wrote:
> I agree with this a well. I burned on this from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1 because the
> Cookie module was switched from CGI to Apache. It would be good if the
> testdeps dies on install or upgrade.
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:45:04AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > I think that the "make upgrade" target might do well to run testdeps
> > -quiet, and fail if dependencies are not satisfied. Something like
> > this:
> > upgrade: checkdeps dirs config-replace upgrade-noclobber
> > checkdeps:
> > $(PERL) ./tools/testdeps -quiet $(DB_TYPE)
> > should do nicely to prevent us from running into problems during an
> > upgrade which may introduce new dependencies unexpectedly.
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.fsck.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://pallas.eruditorum.org/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20010724/edc67c95/attachment.pgp
More information about the Rt-devel