[rt-devel] Re: [rt-users] [rt-announce] RT 2.0 Beta 1 released
'Jesse'
jesse at fsck.com
Fri Mar 23 12:21:39 EST 2001
I've attached the source for buglist.html. It's just a series of queries
against the RT2 database :)
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:16:30AM -0600, Sean Walberg wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> I've been meaning to ask how http://fsck.com/rt2/NoAuth/Buglist.html is
> generated... I'm trying to put together a series of demos to convince
> people to use RT2 for our helpdesk system, and I could see some uses for
> something like this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse [mailto:jesse at fsck.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 8:56 AM
> To: rt-announce at fsck.com
> Subject: [rt-users] [rt-announce] RT 2.0 Beta 1 released
>
>
> It gives me great pleasure to announce RT 2.0 Beta 1. This release marks
> an important milestone in RT 2.0's development cycle. All major
> functionality
> expected for RT 2.0 has now been integrated into the codebase. The database
> schema is frozen.
>
> Upgrades from Beta 1 to RT 2.0 and any intermediate releases are now
> a 'supported' procedure. (Well, supported as much as the rest of the
> package is ;)
>
> Some highlights of Beta1:
>
> * Ports to Oracle 8 and Postgres 7
>
> * Significant work on the incoming mail gateway
>
> * Support for merging tickets
>
> * Simpler, cleaner installation
>
> * Lots of UI improvements
>
> * Lots of bug fixes
>
> * The beginnings of a manual
>
> How to get it:
>
> Fire up your trusty ftp client and point it at:
>
> ftp://ftp.fsck.com/pub/rt/devel/rt-1-3-61.tar.gz
>
> tar xzvf rt-1-3-61.tar.gz
>
> cd rt-1-3-61
>
> more README
>
> Reporting bugs:
>
> If you run into issues, please send bug reports to
> rt-2.0-bugs at fsck.com
> Try to include: perl version, database type and version, OS and
> version, sendmail (or replacement) version, any stack trace
> generated
> and anything else you might find useful.
>
> The future:
>
> I'm hard at work on RT 2.0 Beta 2 (You can see the todo list at:
> http://fsck.com/rt2/NoAuth/Buglist.html)
>
> After Beta 2, I'll role a release candidate for 2.0, which I'll let
> percolate for a few weeks. If we don't find any showstoppers,
> that will become RT 2.0.0.
>
>
> Jesse
>
>
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> ...realized that the entire structure of the net could be changed to be made
>
> more efficient, elegant, and spontaneously make more money for everyone
> involved. It's a marvelously simple diagram, but this form doesn't have a
> way
> for me to draw it. It'll wait. -Adam Hirsch
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-announce mailing list
> Rt-announce at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-announce
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
They'll take my private key when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://pallas.eruditorum.org/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20010323/99cac264/Buglist.html
More information about the Rt-devel
mailing list