[Rt-devel] Minor bug/patch in search results - multi-value CFs

Stephen Turner sturner at MIT.EDU
Wed Dec 22 09:54:56 EST 2004

At Tuesday 12/21/2004 02:56 PM, Jesse Vincent wrote:

>On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:31:47AM -0500, Stephen Turner wrote:
> > Minor bug - in search results, a custom field with multiple values is 
> shown
> > with its values concatenated (e.g. "AppleOrangeBanana").
> >
> > Here's a suggested small patch that would comma-separate the list.
>So, sometimes we use commas and sometimes we use <UL> lists. I'm sort of
>tempted to standardize on the lists since they're something that's
>somewhat easier to parse.  (What happens if you have values with
>embedded commas).  Thoughts?
>         Jesse

Agreed, the commas don't quite do it. The UL lists look OK and do match the 
ticket display screen. Should I send something in to do this?


More information about the Rt-devel mailing list