[Rt-devel] mod_perl vs. cgi

Jesse Vincent jesse at bestpractical.com
Wed May 12 13:58:51 EDT 2004




On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Chris Meyer wrote:
> We recently installed RT 3 on Mac OS X with Apache 1.3 and mod_perl...
> 
> We had to make a change in lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm to change the  
> 'HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler' args_method to 'mod_perl' otherwise we  
> couldn't log into the system.

Because, in general, we've found the CGI args_method to be much more
stable and functional than the mod_perl args method, except on broken
vendor builds of mod_perl.


> But... we had to make additional changes to handle attachments, as  
> outlined in the message:
> 
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/2002-February/ 
> 002092.html
> 
> Is there a reason that patch was never applied? Should I submit a new  
> patch?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel

-- 


More information about the Rt-devel mailing list