[Rt-devel] mod_perl vs. cgi
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Wed May 12 13:58:51 EDT 2004
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Chris Meyer wrote:
> We recently installed RT 3 on Mac OS X with Apache 1.3 and mod_perl...
>
> We had to make a change in lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm to change the
> 'HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler' args_method to 'mod_perl' otherwise we
> couldn't log into the system.
Because, in general, we've found the CGI args_method to be much more
stable and functional than the mod_perl args method, except on broken
vendor builds of mod_perl.
> But... we had to make additional changes to handle attachments, as
> outlined in the message:
>
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/2002-February/
> 002092.html
>
> Is there a reason that patch was never applied? Should I submit a new
> patch?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
--
More information about the Rt-devel
mailing list