[Rt-devel] Bug? Imbalance in linking history

[Joby Walker]

I would like to see two transactions as well, but have them be different
-- base and target for example.  Then we can queue the scrips off the
different ends.

Joby Walker
ITI SSG, University of Washington


Todd Chapman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:30:01PM -0500, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:04:00PM -0500, Todd Chapman wrote:
>>
>>>When you linkg 2 tickets or delete a link between 2 tickets,
>>>the transaction is only recorded in the ticket that is
>>>used to add/delete the link. Given the bi-directional
>>>nature of links, shouldn't these transaction be recorded
>>>in both tickets?
>>
>>Should it generate two transactions? (and run two sets of scrips..)
>>
>>This was something I angsted about at the time, but I haven't heard much
>>in the way of commentary about it until now.
>>
> 
> 
> I would think that it should generate two transactions but have
> one of them supress running scrips. Anyone writing s scrip based
> on adding/deleting scrips should expect one transaction and look
> at both ends of the link. Well, look at both ends of the link
> for AddLink. Of the top of my head I'm not sure how to find both
> ends of the link for DeleteLink. Unless deleting a link
> should cause 2 scrips to run. Either way both tickets should
> have a transaction; I'm sure of that.
> 
> 
> 
>>Jesse
>>
>>
>>>-Todd
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Rt-devel mailing list
>>>Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
>>>http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
>>>
>>
>>-- 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel