[Rt-devel] Bug? Imbalance in linking history

[Ruslan Zakirov]

+1 about two transactions

But IMO we should run scrips twice, reasons:
1) would be consistent solution, as less exceptions we have as more
maintainable and refactorable our code is;
2) scrip in normal stage must have three context objects: ticket,
transaction, template; if you run scrips only for one transaction then
authors of the scrips have to dig additional context objects themself
which leads to new questions on the rt-users.
3) previouse behaviour is bug and if scrips follow buggy behaviour
then them should be changed;
4) ...


On 11/4/05, Jesse Vincent <jesse at bestpractical.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I would think that it should generate two transactions but have
> > > > one of them supress running scrips.
>       __________________________________
>
> > > >Anyone writing s scrip based
> > > > on adding/deleting scrips should expect one transaction and look
> > > > at both ends of the link. Well, look at both ends of the link
> > > > for AddLink. Of the top of my head I'm not sure how to find both
> > > > ends of the link for DeleteLink. Unless deleting a link
> > > > should cause 2 scrips to run. Either way both tickets should
> > > > have a transaction; I'm sure of that.
> > >
> > > What should the generic OnTransaction scrip do?
> >
> > I don't follow you. ???
>
> Terribly sorry. I missed the underlined phrase. Wanna send a patch and
> tests? ;)
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-devel mailing list
> Rt-devel at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
>


--
Best regards, Ruslan.