[Rt-devel] posting of rt-bugs

[Jesse Vincent]

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:57:45PM +0200, Dirk Pape wrote:
> Hello Jesse,
> 
> should bugs be posted to rt-bugs only or also to rt-devel-List. I ask 
> because I filed some bugs to rt-bugs that have never been responded to. I 
> have never seen this happened when I posted to rt-devel.

Yep. It is a problem. We're currently working to make this better by
setting up a scheme where correspondence on rt-bugs tickets goes to
rt-devel automatically (and correspondence from the list about tickets
would get added to the ticket).

This is what perl5-porters does and it works really well for them.
Does it sound like this would help?

Best,
JEsse

> 
> So I do a reminder here and ask for future policy:
> 
> [fsck.com #7539] AutoReply: rt-3.4-bug (perhabps in Text::Quoted?): message 
> not displayed correctly
> [fsck.com #7635] AutoReply: bug rt 3.{4.5|6.0}: attachment from outlook 
> with umlauts in filename
> 
> Regards,
> Dirk.
> -- 
> Dr. Dirk Pape (eAS - Projektleitung Campus Management)
> Freie Universitaet Berlin
> Grunewaldstr. 34a, 12165 Berlin
> Tel. +49 (30) 838 75143, Fax. +49 (30) 838 54654
> _______________________________________________
> List info: http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
> 
> Best Practical is hiring! Come hack Perl for us: 
> http://bestpractical.com/about/jobs.html
> 

--