On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 04:34:36PM -0700, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote: > The problem still exists in 3.6.1 (tested with PostgreSQL). However, > now I am a bit confused -- I was able to create custom fields "Broken > in", "broken in", and "broken in" again -- is that the desired > behavior? Custom field names are not guaranteed unique.