[Rt-devel] [Rt-commit] r16536 - in rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS: etc

[Ruslan Zakirov]

It shouldn't include "new". This change will break some logic. Is
there any problems with that I should be aware of?


On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:52 AM,  <sunnavy at bestpractical.com> wrote:
> Author: sunnavy
> Date: Sat Oct 25 03:52:28 2008
> New Revision: 16536
>
> Modified:
>   rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/   (props changed)
>   rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata
>
> Log:
>  r17396 at sunnavys-mb:  sunnavy | 2008-10-25 15:20:21 +0800
>  active should include new
>
>
> Modified: rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata
> ==============================================================================
> --- rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata (original)
> +++ rt/branches/3.999-DANGEROUS/etc/initialdata Sat Oct 25 03:52:28 2008
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@
>       content => {
>         default => {
>             initial  => ['new'],
> -            active   => ['open', 'stalled'],
> +            active   => [ 'new', 'open', 'stalled'],
>             inactive => ['resolved', 'rejected', 'deleted'],
>             transitions => {
>                 new      => [qw(open resolved rejected deleted)],
> _______________________________________________
> Rt-commit mailing list
> Rt-commit at lists.bestpractical.com
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-commit
>



-- 
Best regards, Ruslan.