[Rt-devel] [rt-users] Upgrade RT
Asif Iqbal
vadud3 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 28 13:45:26 EDT 2009
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Tim Cutts <tjrc at sanger.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 17 Nov 2008, at 10:34 pm, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
> Do I upgrade from RT 3.4.5 to RT 3.8.1 directly? Or there is a roadmap
>> somewhere?
>>
>
> You can do this in almost one go, yes. It's almost exactly what I'm doing
> with my production RT, where I'm going from 3.4.2 to 3.8.1
>
>
>> Do I upgrade the mysql 4.0.24 to 4.1 first before upgrading the RT?
>>
>
> Yes. Or at least, here's what I've tested, and seems to work quite well:
>
> 1) Set up a new RT box for your new server, so that you can always back
> out if this goes wrong. On this server, install the new version of MySQL
> you want to use, and install RT 3.8.1
>
> 2) Make a dump of your production MySQL instance, and load it into the new
> MySQL database.
>
> 3) Run the /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action upgrade command as
> detailed in the RT 3.8.1 README file, but only as far as version 3.8.0
>
> 4) Run the MySQL upgrade script, as detailed in UPGRADING.mysql, and apply
> the SQL statements it wants you to make. This can take a long time; the
> alter table statements are pretty slow-running.
>
> 5) Run the /opt/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action upgrade thing again
> for the last small changes from 3.8.0 to 3.8.1
>
Ok now that upgrade completed on the test system, I now see 5000 more
tickets already
created on the production systems. Do I have to redo this whole thing? I
have binlog enabled
since the beginning of the original instance. How do I append those new 500
tickets?
I guess I am now on a catchup game :-)
>
> After that, it all seemed to work pretty well.
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome ResearchLimited,
> a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and acompany registered
> in England with number 2742969, whose registeredoffice is 215 Euston Road,
> London, NW1 2BE.
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-devel/attachments/20090428/35451e2f/attachment.htm
More information about the Rt-devel
mailing list