[rt-users] final priority implemented?

[Jesse]

There is in fact no logic implemented for final priority.

> it is generally useful to have distinct concepts of urgency and importance....


*nod*  it's something that will likely get folded in down the line.

thanks,
	j


On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:35:18AM -0800, Mark D. Anderson wrote:
> i can find no indication in the 1.05 code base that the "final priority" logic is implemented.
> i'm not sure what the logic is even supposed to be -- some vague sort of thing like "increase to this
> value as due date approaches".
> 
> this is just as well, since actually the reason i was checking was because i was thinking
> about taking over the essentially useless field and replacing it with an "importance" or
> "severity" field. i'd just use the same schema, but change the templates.
> so i'd want to disable any special logic that might mess up my alternative use of that INT column.
> 
> 
> -mda
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

Any e-mail sent to the SLA will immediately become the intellectual property
of the SLA and the author of said message will enter into a period of
indentured servitude which will last for a period of time no less than seven
years.