[rt-users] RT 2.0.4 webRT installation problem

Jesse jesse at fsck.com
Sat Aug 4 00:37:15 EDT 2001


My only real suggestion is _not_ to use the apache 2.0 betas.  Stick to 1.3.20

        -j

On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:01:36PM -0500, Gilbie wrote:
> httpd -l shows that mod_perl wasn't compiled in.
> On 2nd thought, I was using suse's binary rpm anyway.
> 
> I'm using apache 1.3.12.  Since I'm upgrading from suse's binary rpm, 
> I'm thinking of pulling apache 2.0.16 beta and compile everything.  Will 
> RT2 work with it?  Any comments?  I'm just thinking about this since 
> lately I've been abadoning suse's binary rpm's regularly--first 
> upgrading to php 4.06, then mysql 3.22.32 to 3.23.40, perl 5.005_3 to 
> 5.6.1, and in the process upgrading tons of stuff anyway...  Any 
> suggestions would be appreciated.
> 
> Andrew Storms wrote:
> 
> > If you run 'httpd -l', apache will report to you what modules were compiled
> > in.
> > Look for 'mod_perl.c' in the list.
> > 
> > -----------------------------------
> > Andrew Storms
> > storms at icplanet.com
> > I.T. Manager / Solutions Architect
> > http://www.icplanet.com
> > -----------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
> >> [mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com]On Behalf Of Gilbie
> >> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 6:58 PM
> >> To: Jesse
> >> Cc: rt-users
> >> Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT 2.0.4 webRT installation problem
> >> 
> >> 
> >> How do I test for sure if I have mod_perl?
> >> my httpd.conf seems to have referenced it.
> >> rpm -q mod_perl says it's installed...
> >> 
> >> Jesse wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Sounds like your apache doesn't have mod_perl compiled in.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 08:35:15PM -0500, Gilbie wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Thanks to Darrin and Brandon's comments, I now have the
> >>> 
> >> basic RT installed.
> >> 
> >>>> I've upgraded to mysql 3.23.40.
> >>>> I should say, at least the database creation script didn't
> >>> 
> >> complain and
> >> 
> >>>> generated the db.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Next I try to integrate webRT with apache, and it has
> >>> 
> >> syntax errors.  I
> >> 
> >>>> removed every line and add back line by line and it failed when
> >>>> PerlModule apache::dbi was referenced.  So from FAQ, I
> >>> 
> >> installed that by
> >> 
> >>>> hand.  Now it complains when I add the next line (PerlRequire
> >>>> ..webmux.pl).  ( no <location> construct yet..)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Any idea what I may be missing?
> >>>> 
> >>>> btw, now apache and mysql is finally working with my other
> >>> 
> >> old web db
> >> 
> >>>> programs.  Still need to change /sbin/init.d code to match
> >>> 
> >> since I'm on
> >> 
> >>>> suse 7.0 platform.  (Location of directories are
> >>> 
> >> different.  :-(  )  But
> >> 
> >>>> I am still using the older mysql CLIENT programs, since I
> >>> 
> >> have only
> >> 
> >>>> installed mysql's tar.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> rt-users mailing list
> >>>> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> >>>> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rt-users mailing list
> >> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> >> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

"If IBM _wanted_ to make clones, we could make them cheaper and faster than
anyone else!"  - An IBM Rep. visiting Vassar College's Comp Sci Department.




More information about the rt-users mailing list