[rt-users] Need "DB_PORT" in Makefile and support throughout build

[Jesse]

Sounds like a perfectly reasonable request to me ;)
There's at least one other postgres-related option I need to roll in.  
This should happen for 2.0.6 or 2.0.7.

        -j



On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 02:39:47PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "JB" == Jeff Blaine <jblaine at mitre.org> writes:
> 
> JB> It's on another port because we're running an older version of PostgreSQL
> JB> on the default port.
> 
> From a cursory scan of the initdb script, my *guess* is that if you
> specify DB_HOST=localhost;port=NNNN in the Makefile, it *should* trick
> it into using the correct DBI incantation to connect to port NNNN
> instead of the default.  You will of course have to try it to find
> out, and double check the results after config.pm is generated.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

that's security the same way that asking for directions to topeka and
being told that a seal is a mammal is informative
					-robin at apocalypse.org