[rt-users] Need "DB_PORT" in Makefile and support throughout build

[Technical Support]

That's exactly what I would say.
If a test situation is considered viral enough to affect a working software
config, the assumption should be made, in order to protect the production
config, that the test may in fact affect the hardware as well, therefore, in
our shop, all tests get their own box.





-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
[mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com]On Behalf Of Darrin Walton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Alan Charlton
Cc: jblaine at mitre.org; rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Need "DB_PORT" in Makefile and support
throughout build


  |+ This might seem a silly question, but why?

Some of us run multiple database servers on the same machine for various
reasons.  Testing a new version of a database, testing software (you
wouldn't want to be doing testing on the production database), etc.

While many of you may say 'why not put it on another machine'.  This is
not always possible.


_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users