[rt-users] Need "DB_PORT" in Makefile and support throughout build

[Jesse]

I'm going to have to agree with trevor here.  Besides, I implemented
it tonight. It'll be in the next prerelease of 2.0.6. I look forward to
hearing about whether it works right from folks who need it ;)


On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 06:00:48PM -0700, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> I'd like to point out that this discussion is getting needlessly off topic
> for the rt-users list.
> 
> Trevor Sky Garside
> <trevor at trevorsky.com>
> 
> PS -- Please don't flame me...  ;)
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darrin Walton" <darrinw at nixc.net>
> To: "Technical Support" <service at lobosoft.com>
> Cc: <rt-users at lists.fsck.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Need "DB_PORT" in Makefile and support throughout
> build
> > Let me present this situation to you.
> >
> > You have to bring up a circuit (say OC48).  Bringing up the circuit to
> > test could, in some way crash the router.  (router vendor not important,
> > it could be either cisco or juniper).
> >
> > Now, bringing the circuit up on a 'test' router, if you have one available
> > for both sides of the connections (which let me tell you, gets quite
> > expensive, usually test equipment is kept in a lab somewhere).  You test
> > the circuit, it is clean.  Now, you still have to put it on the production
> > router.  Putting the circuit on the production router could crash the
> > router.  What do you do?
> >
> > Your solution is not feesable for every situation.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 

-- 
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com 
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

I admit that X is the second worst windowing system in the world, but all the 
others I've used are tied for first.