From jesse at fsck.com Sun Jul 1 00:10:54 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 00:10:54 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Problem with .qmail
In-Reply-To: ; from davidu@everydns.net on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:43:56AM -0700
References:
Message-ID: <20010701001054.A13305@pallas.fsck.com>
Try TFM. http://www.helgrim.com/rtdocs/article4.html#34
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:43:56AM -0700, David U. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got RT installed correctly but qmail doesn't seem to handle my entry in the
> .qmail-support file.
>
> Here is the contents of /home/vpopmail/domains/everydns.net/.qmail-support:
>
> |/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue general --action correspond
>
> and here are the logs:
>
> 2001-06-30 05:39:14.317930500 delivery 1694: deferral:
> Can't_locate_config.pm_in_ at INC_(@INC_contains:_/opt/rt2/etc_/opt/rt2/lib_/usr/lo
> cal/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i686-linux_/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.0_/usr/local/lib/perl5/s
> ite_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux_/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0_/usr/local/lib/pe
> rl5/site_perl_.)_at_/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm_line_81./BEGIN_failed--co
> mpilation_aborted_at_/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm_line_81./Compilation_fai
> led_in_require_at_/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate_line_18./BEGIN_failed--compilation_ab
> orted_at_/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate_line_18./
> 2001-06-30 05:39:14.317957500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/120
>
>
> Any ideas? I think someone had a similar issue a few days ago, but I'm not
> sure...there didn't seem to be a solution posted.
>
> -davidu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
They'll take my private key when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!
From rotman at inode.at Sun Jul 1 06:49:15 2001
From: rotman at inode.at (robert rotman)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:49:15 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Problems with Reply
Message-ID:
Hi,
I've a problem with replying to tickets in rt2.
In the web-interface everything seems to be ok but no mail is sent
if i try to reply to requestors.
I granted all the rights to this user in all the queues.
/tmp/rt.log.xxx says nothing and the senmail-log is emty.
the autoreply works.
any suggestions where to start to debug?
Robert
From rotman at inode.at Sun Jul 1 06:58:46 2001
From: rotman at inode.at (robert rotman)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:58:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Re: Problems with Reply
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Sorry for this posting...
I'v spent hours on this problem and 1 minute after i posted this i solved
the problem ;-))
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, robert rotman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've a problem with replying to tickets in rt2.
> In the web-interface everything seems to be ok but no mail is sent
> if i try to reply to requestors.
> I granted all the rights to this user in all the queues.
> /tmp/rt.log.xxx says nothing and the senmail-log is emty.
> the autoreply works.
>
>
> any suggestions where to start to debug?
>
>
> Robert
>
From derek at csolve.net Mon Jul 2 10:46:47 2001
From: derek at csolve.net (Derek Buttineau)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:46:47 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] New Issue
References: <025b01c100e4$d3ada2c0$159ad0d8@csolve.net> <20010629180316.E13305@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <002401c10305$d4f30260$dc0e23cf@DerekButtineau>
Well does indeed look like sendmail is removing the setgid...
I set config.pm to be readable by other and it allowed the message to hit
the program.
Derek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse"
To: "Derek Buttineau"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-users] New Issue
> Taht looks like rt-mailgate has lost it's setgid bit. or perhaps sendmail
clobbers it.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:45:34PM -0400, Derek Buttineau wrote:
> > I've resolved the web page error that I was previously experiencing by
using the Apache::Cookie vs CGI::Cookie as described in a previous message..
> >
> > I however am now having an issue with the mailer gateway... using
sendmail 8.11.3 (standard on freebsd 4.3), it doesn't seem to find the
config.pm and ends up with this message:
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action correspond"
> > (reason: 2)
> > (expanded from: rt)
> >
> > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/rt2/etc
/home/rt2/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
/home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81.
> > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm
line 81.
> > Compilation failed in require at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18.
> > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18.
> > 554 5.3.0 "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action
correspond"... unknown mailer error 2
> >
> >
> > Any notions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Derek Buttineau
> > Internet Systems Administrator
> > Compu-SOLVE Internet Services
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> T\'waS br|ll1G 4|\||> 7#e sl1T#Y T0v3s D1|> gYR3 4nd Gimb at 1 1|\| 7#E
\/\/A83
> all |\/|1|\/|53Y W3R3 d4 60r0GR0V3s @|\||> |>4 M0MES wr47H oUTGR4b3.
>
From derek at csolve.net Mon Jul 2 15:24:06 2001
From: derek at csolve.net (Derek Buttineau)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:24:06 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] New Issue
Message-ID: <000901c1032c$90594b60$dc0e23cf@DerekButtineau>
Found a way to leave the config.pm file unreadable but still have it run...
I set the group on the config.pm and the rt-mailgate to be group daemon
which is the group that sendmail runs as and it seems to work as intended.
Derek
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Buttineau"
To: "Jesse" ; "Derek Buttineau"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [rt-users] New Issue
> Well does indeed look like sendmail is removing the setgid...
>
> I set config.pm to be readable by other and it allowed the message to hit
> the program.
>
> Derek
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jesse"
> To: "Derek Buttineau"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 6:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] New Issue
>
>
> > Taht looks like rt-mailgate has lost it's setgid bit. or perhaps
sendmail
> clobbers it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:45:34PM -0400, Derek Buttineau wrote:
> > > I've resolved the web page error that I was previously experiencing by
> using the Apache::Cookie vs CGI::Cookie as described in a previous
message..
> > >
> > > I however am now having an issue with the mailer gateway... using
> sendmail 8.11.3 (standard on freebsd 4.3), it doesn't seem to find the
> config.pm and ends up with this message:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > > "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action correspond"
> > > (reason: 2)
> > > (expanded from: rt)
> > >
> > > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > > Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/rt2/etc
> /home/rt2/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
> /home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81.
> > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm
> line 81.
> > > Compilation failed in require at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18.
> > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line
18.
> > > 554 5.3.0 "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action
> correspond"... unknown mailer error 2
> > >
> > >
> > > Any notions?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Derek Buttineau
> > > Internet Systems Administrator
> > > Compu-SOLVE Internet Services
> > >
> >
> > --
> > jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> > 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
> >
> > T\'waS br|ll1G 4|\||> 7#e sl1T#Y T0v3s D1|> gYR3 4nd Gimb at 1 1|\| 7#E
> \/\/A83
> > all |\/|1|\/|53Y W3R3 d4 60r0GR0V3s @|\||> |>4 M0MES wr47H oUTGR4b3.
> >
>
From jesse at fsck.com Sun Jul 1 17:05:45 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 17:05:45 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] New Issue
In-Reply-To: <000901c1032c$90594b60$dc0e23cf@DerekButtineau>; from derek@csolve.net on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0400
References: <000901c1032c$90594b60$dc0e23cf@DerekButtineau>
Message-ID: <20010701170545.J25181@pallas.fsck.com>
That will work. sort of. It opens up the rather nasty security
hole that anything in group daemon has access to your RT database password.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:24:06PM -0400, Derek Buttineau wrote:
> Found a way to leave the config.pm file unreadable but still have it run...
>
> I set the group on the config.pm and the rt-mailgate to be group daemon
> which is the group that sendmail runs as and it seems to work as intended.
>
> Derek
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Derek Buttineau"
> To: "Jesse" ; "Derek Buttineau"
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] New Issue
>
>
> > Well does indeed look like sendmail is removing the setgid...
> >
> > I set config.pm to be readable by other and it allowed the message to hit
> > the program.
> >
> > Derek
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jesse"
> > To: "Derek Buttineau"
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 6:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [rt-users] New Issue
> >
> >
> > > Taht looks like rt-mailgate has lost it's setgid bit. or perhaps
> sendmail
> > clobbers it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 05:45:34PM -0400, Derek Buttineau wrote:
> > > > I've resolved the web page error that I was previously experiencing by
> > using the Apache::Cookie vs CGI::Cookie as described in a previous
> message..
> > > >
> > > > I however am now having an issue with the mailer gateway... using
> > sendmail 8.11.3 (standard on freebsd 4.3), it doesn't seem to find the
> > config.pm and ends up with this message:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> > > > "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action correspond"
> > > > (reason: 2)
> > > > (expanded from: rt)
> > > >
> > > > ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> > > > Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/rt2/etc
> > /home/rt2/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-freebsd
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
> > /home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81.
> > > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
> /home/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm
> > line 81.
> > > > Compilation failed in require at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18.
> > > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line
> 18.
> > > > 554 5.3.0 "|/home/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue support --action
> > correspond"... unknown mailer error 2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any notions?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Derek Buttineau
> > > > Internet Systems Administrator
> > > > Compu-SOLVE Internet Services
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> > > 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
> > >
> > > T\'waS br|ll1G 4|\||> 7#e sl1T#Y T0v3s D1|> gYR3 4nd Gimb at 1 1|\| 7#E
> > \/\/A83
> > > all |\/|1|\/|53Y W3R3 d4 60r0GR0V3s @|\||> |>4 M0MES wr47H oUTGR4b3.
> > >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
I think co-ordinating 1000 prima donnas living all over the world will be as
easy as herding cats..." -- Andy Tanenbaum on the linux development model, 1992
From pdh at lineo.com Sun Jul 1 18:05:12 2001
From: pdh at lineo.com (Phil Homewood)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:05:12 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 / sendmail error
In-Reply-To: <200106292105.f5TL53q31474@svr1.ministratrix.net>; from tarren@tarren.co.uk on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 10:05:14PM +0100
References: <200106292105.f5TL53q31474@svr1.ministratrix.net>
Message-ID: <20010702080512.O22709@bofh.internal.moreton.com.au>
Tarren wrote:
> I guess the important bit is "can't do setuid", but I don't know what to
> do next. Any help is appreciated, 'cos the rest seems to be working just
> fine.
chmod u+s /usr/bin/suidperl
From tarren at tarren.co.uk Sun Jul 1 19:48:02 2001
From: tarren at tarren.co.uk (Tarren)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 00:48:02 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 / sendmail error
In-Reply-To: <20010702080512.O22709@bofh.internal.moreton.com.au>
Message-ID: <200107012347.f61Nldx29757@svr1.ministratrix.net>
On Sunday, July 1, 2001, at 11:05 pm, Phil Homewood wrote:
> Tarren wrote:
>> I guess the important bit is "can't do setuid", but I don't know what
>> to
>> do next. Any help is appreciated, 'cos the rest seems to be working
>> just
>> fine.
>
> chmod u+s /usr/bin/suidperl
Hi Phil,
Absolutely perfect! Thank you.
I've now got RT2 fully running as intended, import done from v1, and
I've just got to say that I love it!
Regards,
Tarren.
From sanity at fretzel.net Sun Jul 1 22:00:19 2001
From: sanity at fretzel.net (Sanity)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:00:19 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [rt-users] Using CPAN
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
I just hit CTRL-C also when I saw the CPAN scripts start to download
perl5.6.1, it canceled the download and kept right on getting the rest of
the modules I needed.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 niltsiar at neo.rr.com wrote:
> If I remember correctly, I successfully avoided having CPAN build the new
> version of Perl by hitting CTRL-C when the Perl install started. It might
> have been at the first configuration question, I'm not sure, it was a
> while ago.
>
>
From michael at thies.org Mon Jul 2 06:33:09 2001
From: michael at thies.org (Michael Thies)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:33:09 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] errors in using rt2 .-(
In-Reply-To: <20010627084945.O6253@pallas.fsck.com>; from jesse@fsck.com on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:49:45AM -0400
References: <20010622142122.F20050@cephyr.cid.net> <20010622124706.F4501@pallas.fsck.com> <20010622191810.A14217@cephyr.cid.net> <993230763.12998.93.camel@zero.kgon.com> <20010623235629.D4691@cephyr.cid.net> <20010625120941.A19549@cephyr.cid.net> <20010625090652.K5992@pallas.fsck.com> <20010627115542.D27594@cephyr.cid.net> <20010627084945.O6253@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010702123309.A3616@cephyr.cid.net>
Hi,
we just installed perl 5.6.1, and I still have this Problem. .-(
curiously the sessiondata-dir is owned by user 42 after a restart of apache.
and it has groupid of nogroup (group running apache).
sessiondata-dir has file in it (owned by nobody:nogroup).
Doing a logout, I'm back logged in, as the last user .-(
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:49:45AM -0400, Jesse wrote:
> That _sounds_ like an issue with your WebRT/sessiondata directory not
> being properly writable or possibly your CGI::Cookie being out of date.
the dir ist now (for testin purposes) chmod 777, nothing helped.
And the CGI::Cookie is Version 1.18.
I don't get it .-(
Maybe anybody here, who could open my eyes again?
TiA
--
\o/
Michael Thies
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Mon Jul 2 01:23:35 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 15:23:35 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Keywords / Forwarding / Control / LDAP
Message-ID: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au>
I've implemented rt 1.0.7 for a couple of units within the university, and
it's performing well.
We're in the process of thinking about rt 2, and I have a few questions:
1) Can anyone explain what the purpose of keywords is?
2) The information office receives hundreds of emails a week, and many of
them must be forwarded onto the people responsible (who don't use RT). How
difficult would it be to have a 'forward' button which would present a
drop-down list of addresses, fwd the ticket on, and mark it as resolved?
Perl doesn't scare me, but I'd rather ask here first in case someone's
already done it. Any hints as to where would be the appropriate place to
put this code would also be appreciated.
3) As I mentioned, Several departments use RT, and at the moment I have
several seperate instances of RT installed. I'd much prefer to maintain
one single database, and still be able to delegate user account control to
the appropriate supervisors in the departments concerned, *without* them
being able to mess with the other queue's settings. Is this even remotely
possible?
4) We already have the entire university in an LDAP system - Has anyone
written something to provide LDAP authentication to RT (and/or importing
name,email etc from LDAP). Jesse said a long time ago that RT2 would be a
lot easier to add authentication methods to - if I code it myself, where
should I be looking ?
Thanks in advance.
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 09:01:40 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:01:40 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Keywords / Forwarding / Control / LDAP
In-Reply-To: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au>; from teo.dehesselle@uts.edu.au on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:23:35PM +1000
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com>
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:23:35PM +1000, Teo de Hesselle wrote:
>
> I've implemented rt 1.0.7 for a couple of units within the university, and
> it's performing well.
>
> We're in the process of thinking about rt 2, and I have a few questions:
>
> 1) Can anyone explain what the purpose of keywords is?
Imagine if you could define multiple area pulldowns per queue, optionally be
able to select multiple values for some areas and could define areas
that apply to all queues. That's Keywords.
>
> 2) The information office receives hundreds of emails a week, and many of
> them must be forwarded onto the people responsible (who don't use RT). How
> difficult would it be to have a 'forward' button which would present a
> drop-down list of addresses, fwd the ticket on, and mark it as resolved?
>
> Perl doesn't scare me, but I'd rather ask here first in case someone's
> already done it. Any hints as to where would be the appropriate place to
> put this code would also be appreciated.
It shouldn't be that hard to do, but I've not heard of anyone doing it
so far. You'd actually probably want to be doing this directly
to the web front end. Take a look at webrt/Ticket/Display.html and
the components it calls.
>
> 3) As I mentioned, Several departments use RT, and at the moment I have
> several seperate instances of RT installed. I'd much prefer to maintain
> one single database, and still be able to delegate user account control to
> the appropriate supervisors in the departments concerned, *without* them
> being able to mess with the other queue's settings. Is this even remotely
> possible?
>
The access control system is pretty flexible, but I'd need to know waht you mean by 'user account control' before I could give you a reasonable answer.
> 4) We already have the entire university in an LDAP system - Has anyone
> written something to provide LDAP authentication to RT (and/or importing
> name,email etc from LDAP). Jesse said a long time ago that RT2 would be a
> lot easier to add authentication methods to - if I code it myself, where
> should I be looking ?
Well, I haven't touched the importer, but for authentication, you might
want to look over the last week or two's list archives at http://lists.fsck.com
People have been dealing with setting up 'External Authentication' which
would mean that you'd have to set up mod_ldap and then you'd bascially be
done ;)
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
> Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
> | about surviving until Friday
> University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
I think co-ordinating 1000 prima donnas living all over the world will be as
easy as herding cats..." -- Andy Tanenbaum on the linux development model, 1992
From khera at kcilink.com Mon Jul 2 09:27:41 2001
From: khera at kcilink.com (Vivek Khera)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:27:41 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] New Issue
In-Reply-To: <026d01c100e8$38cf31c0$159ad0d8@csolve.net>
References: <025b01c100e4$d3ada2c0$159ad0d8@csolve.net>
<20010629180316.E13305@pallas.fsck.com>
<026d01c100e8$38cf31c0$159ad0d8@csolve.net>
Message-ID: <15168.30413.78322.253425@onceler.kciLink.com>
>>>>> "DB" == Derek Buttineau writes:
DB> It may be that sendmail is clobbering it, I have the file permissions set
DB> with a setgid bit on it...
DB> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root rt 15789 Jun 29 15:38 rt-mailgate
Yes, but it is a perl program, so suidperl needs to do the setgid for
you. Is your suidperl properly configured?
From cgilmore at tivoli.com Mon Jul 2 10:00:35 2001
From: cgilmore at tivoli.com (Christian Gilmore)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:00:35 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Keywords / Forwarding / Control / LDAP
In-Reply-To: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <000c01c102ff$5e0cd5a0$69285492@tivoli.com>
> 4) We already have the entire university in an LDAP system -
> Has anyone
> written something to provide LDAP authentication to RT
> (and/or importing
> name,email etc from LDAP). Jesse said a long time ago that
> RT2 would be a
> lot easier to add authentication methods to - if I code it
> myself, where
> should I be looking ?
I've already implemented LDAP with RT2. I'm still considering the
synchronization issues between incoming requests and what the requestor's
LDAP userid (or any attribute, really) would be. I would bet that within
two week's I'll submit a patch that cleanly handles insertion of
site-specific code for this problem with at least the one example I end up
using personally.
Try using Apache::AuthenLDAP and Apache::AuthzLDAP. I've written both of
these modules and have had great success with them within IBM. Also, you
might want to wrap Apache::AuthenCache and Apache::AuthzCache around them
for improved performance.
Regards,
Christian
-----------------
Christian Gilmore
Infrastructure & Tools Team Lead
Web & Multimedia Development
IBM Software Group
From rt at theoesters.com Mon Jul 2 17:37:09 2001
From: rt at theoesters.com (Phil Oester)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:37:09 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
Message-ID: <000e01c1033f$333b6cc0$6400a8c0@phil2k>
I've recently installed rt 2.0, and almost everything is working fine.
Incoming mail is processed, and ends up in the appropriate queue, web
interface works, etc.
I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail is
properly configured on this server. I don't see any debugging info in my
log directory which would point me to a solution for this. Anybody know of
any gotchas?
-Phil
p.s. read faq, email archives
From tom.keeney at novuscg.com Mon Jul 2 18:09:49 2001
From: tom.keeney at novuscg.com (Tom Keeney)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:09:49 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Install Problems
Message-ID: <200107021709.AA2396258972@novuscg.com>
I am at the point in the RT install where I modify httpd.conf to recognize Apache::Mason. I'm getting the following error when restarting Apache:
Syntax error on line 951 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/perl5/5.00503/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/5.00503 /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005 . /usr/apache/perl5/5.005/sun4-solaris) at (eval 3) line 3.
I'm a beginner at Perl, so please help me. How do I modify @INC? I've tried using PerlSetEnv in httpd.conf but it doesn't work. I've also set PerlTaintCheck to "off".
thanks,
Tom
I'm running solaris 2.8, Mysql, Perl 5.005
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Mon Jul 2 18:28:12 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 08:28:12 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
References: <000e01c1033f$333b6cc0$6400a8c0@phil2k>
Message-ID: <3B40F57C.ED3C4881@uts.edu.au>
Phil Oester wrote:
>
> I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail is
Have you added a script to actually send the response when a reply event
occurs ?
HTH.
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 18:37:55 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:37:55 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
In-Reply-To: <000e01c1033f$333b6cc0$6400a8c0@phil2k>; from rt@theoesters.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:37:09PM -0700
References: <000e01c1033f$333b6cc0$6400a8c0@phil2k>
Message-ID: <20010702183755.Z25181@pallas.fsck.com>
What scrips have you set up for your queues?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:37:09PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> I've recently installed rt 2.0, and almost everything is working fine.
> Incoming mail is processed, and ends up in the appropriate queue, web
> interface works, etc.
>
> I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail is
> properly configured on this server. I don't see any debugging info in my
> log directory which would point me to a solution for this. Anybody know of
> any gotchas?
>
> -Phil
>
> p.s. read faq, email archives
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From rt at theoesters.com Mon Jul 2 18:38:06 2001
From: rt at theoesters.com (Phil Oester)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:38:06 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
In-Reply-To: <3B40F57C.ED3C4881@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID:
When posting the original message, I had not, but about 5 minutes after
doing so, I figured that part out, and now have this:
OnCorrespond NotifyRequestors Correspondence
OnCreate AutoreplyToRequestors Autoreply
Now, at least, I get the following in the logfile:
RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Checking condition OnCorrespond...
RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Matches condition OnCorrespond...
now requiring RT::Action::Notify
RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Prepared NotifyRequestors
RT::Action::Notify=HASH(0x8fcc068): No recipients found. Not sending.
RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Committed NotifyRequestors
But as you can see, it says no recipients, and doesn't send anything.
-----Original Message-----
From: Teo de Hesselle [mailto:teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Phil Oester
Cc: rt-users at fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] correspondence problem
Phil Oester wrote:
>
> I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail
is
Have you added a script to actually send the response when a reply event
occurs ?
HTH.
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 18:38:43 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:38:43 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Install Problems
In-Reply-To: <200107021709.AA2396258972@novuscg.com>; from tom.keeney@novuscg.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:09:49PM -0500
References: <200107021709.AA2396258972@novuscg.com>
Message-ID: <20010702183843.B25181@pallas.fsck.com>
perl -MCPAN -e'install Apache::DBI'
should do you.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 05:09:49PM -0500, Tom Keeney wrote:
> I am at the point in the RT install where I modify httpd.conf to recognize Apache::Mason. I'm getting the following error when restarting Apache:
>
> Syntax error on line 951 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
> Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/perl5/5.00503/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/5.00503 /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005 . /usr/apache/perl5/5.005/sun4-solaris) at (eval 3) line 3.
>
> I'm a beginner at Perl, so please help me. How do I modify @INC? I've tried using PerlSetEnv in httpd.conf but it doesn't work. I've also set PerlTaintCheck to "off".
>
> thanks,
> Tom
>
> I'm running solaris 2.8, Mysql, Perl 5.005
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From greg at oreilly.com Mon Jul 2 18:48:24 2001
From: greg at oreilly.com (Greg Dickerson)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:48:24 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Install Problems
References: <200107021709.AA2396258972@novuscg.com>
Message-ID: <003601c10349$1a3680c0$bb6014ac@otter>
You don't have the Apache DBI module installed. If your running RT 2.0 RC3
you can run make testdeps in the rt source root and make fixdeps to install
any other modules you may be missing. This is all covered in the README
file.
You **Should** be able to run,
perl -MCPAN -e'install Apache::DBI'
This will install the Apache DBI perl module.
Greg
------
Greg Dickerson
Support Manager
O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Keeney"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: [rt-users] Install Problems
> I am at the point in the RT install where I modify httpd.conf to recognize
Apache::Mason. I'm getting the following error when restarting Apache:
>
> Syntax error on line 951 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
> Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/perl5/5.00503/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/5.00503
/usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005/sun4-solaris /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.005 .
/usr/apache/perl5/5.005/sun4-solaris) at (eval 3) line 3.
>
> I'm a beginner at Perl, so please help me. How do I modify @INC? I've
tried using PerlSetEnv in httpd.conf but it doesn't work. I've also set
PerlTaintCheck to "off".
>
> thanks,
> Tom
>
> I'm running solaris 2.8, Mysql, Perl 5.005
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
From WBChmura at Ensign-BickfordInd.com Mon Jul 2 15:22:32 2001
From: WBChmura at Ensign-BickfordInd.com (WBChmura at Ensign-BickfordInd.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:22:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Can RT run without mod_perl?
Message-ID: <"H00000730158f165.0994101750.hp_em2*"@MHS>
Out of all the systems out there, this looks like it will fit our needs
the best. The problem is that I need to host it on a third party
service that does not support mod_perl. I assumed that it needed
mod-perl for mason, and found out mason 'can' run without it (at a
great performance loss).
Has anyone attempted this? Or can someone definatively tell me it
cannot be done?
I have a strong Perl background, so I can poke and prod it if need be!
Thanks
Bill
Bill Chmura
Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.
Information Technologies Department
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 18:47:13 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 18:47:13 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
In-Reply-To: ; from rt@theoesters.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:38:06PM -0700
References: <3B40F57C.ED3C4881@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010702184713.E25181@pallas.fsck.com>
I know this one will be in the faq when it gets updated (soon), but are you
taking into account that RT should never mail the person performing the
action? (It tries to be 'smart' aobut it)
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:38:06PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> When posting the original message, I had not, but about 5 minutes after
> doing so, I figured that part out, and now have this:
>
> OnCorrespond NotifyRequestors Correspondence
> OnCreate AutoreplyToRequestors Autoreply
>
> Now, at least, I get the following in the logfile:
>
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Checking condition OnCorrespond...
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Matches condition OnCorrespond...
> now requiring RT::Action::Notify
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Prepared NotifyRequestors
> RT::Action::Notify=HASH(0x8fcc068): No recipients found. Not sending.
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Committed NotifyRequestors
>
> But as you can see, it says no recipients, and doesn't send anything.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teo de Hesselle [mailto:teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:28 PM
> To: Phil Oester
> Cc: rt-users at fsck.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] correspondence problem
>
>
>
> Phil Oester wrote:
> >
> > I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail
> is
>
> Have you added a script to actually send the response when a reply event
> occurs ?
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Gur SOV jnagf gb znxr guvf fvt vyyrtny.
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 19:01:38 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:01:38 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Can RT run without mod_perl?
In-Reply-To: <"H00000730158f165.0994101750.hp_em2*"@MHS>; from WBChmura@Ensign-BickfordInd.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:22:32PM -0400
References: <"H00000730158f165.0994101750.hp_em2*"@MHS>
Message-ID: <20010702190138.F25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Well, the fastcgi handler is _mostly_ functional at this point. It has
more setgid issues than other frontends (go figure) and it can't properly
display non text attachments. but it's most of the way there. if you're
interested in working on it, that would be keen.
(The fastcgi handler should run fine as a regular CGI as well, but will be
um. rather slow ;)
Jesse
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:22:32PM -0400, WBChmura at Ensign-BickfordInd.com wrote:
>
> Out of all the systems out there, this looks like it will fit our needs
> the best. The problem is that I need to host it on a third party
> service that does not support mod_perl. I assumed that it needed
> mod-perl for mason, and found out mason 'can' run without it (at a
> great performance loss).
>
> Has anyone attempted this? Or can someone definatively tell me it
> cannot be done?
>
> I have a strong Perl background, so I can poke and prod it if need be!
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill
>
>
> Bill Chmura
> Ensign-Bickford Industries, Inc.
> Information Technologies Department
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
pretty soon we're going to HAVE to have hypertext mail!
--Tim Berners Lee. (8 Jan 1993 on www-talk)
From phil at theoesters.com Mon Jul 2 19:12:05 2001
From: phil at theoesters.com (Phil Oester)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:12:05 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
In-Reply-To: <20010702184713.E25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
Ok, turns out the mailer I was using to send tickets to the queue was
apparently sending bad header info, from which rt couldn't figure out who
the requestor was. When I send from outlook, everything is perfect.
Thanks - Phil
p.s. the mailer is NetScanTools Pro 2000
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse [mailto:jesse at fsck.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:47 PM
To: Phil Oester
Cc: rt-users at fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] correspondence problem
I know this one will be in the faq when it gets updated (soon), but are you
taking into account that RT should never mail the person performing the
action? (It tries to be 'smart' aobut it)
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 03:38:06PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> When posting the original message, I had not, but about 5 minutes after
> doing so, I figured that part out, and now have this:
>
> OnCorrespond NotifyRequestors Correspondence
> OnCreate AutoreplyToRequestors Autoreply
>
> Now, at least, I get the following in the logfile:
>
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Checking condition OnCorrespond...
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Matches condition OnCorrespond...
> now requiring RT::Action::Notify
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Prepared NotifyRequestors
> RT::Action::Notify=HASH(0x8fcc068): No recipients found. Not sending.
> RT::Transaction=HASH(0x8fc2704): Committed NotifyRequestors
>
> But as you can see, it says no recipients, and doesn't send anything.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teo de Hesselle [mailto:teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au]
> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:28 PM
> To: Phil Oester
> Cc: rt-users at fsck.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] correspondence problem
>
>
>
> Phil Oester wrote:
> >
> > I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail.
Sendmail
> is
>
> Have you added a script to actually send the response when a reply event
> occurs ?
>
> HTH.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Gur SOV jnagf gb znxr guvf fvt vyyrtny.
From rjohnson at tripwire.com Mon Jul 2 19:15:22 2001
From: rjohnson at tripwire.com (Russ Johnson)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:15:22 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Japanese revisited
Message-ID: <1C64CE7BD3DD8C4EB8F6D4A8F2F526C9214E@postalfish.tripwire.com>
Hi RT users.
I'm still fighting with Kanji issues in RT 1.0.7.
If someone sends a message into RT with Shift-JIS character set, it works
fine.
However, if the sender uses ISO-2022-JP, everything is garbled.
Since we can't very well control the character set our customers use when
sending messages, is there another solution?
Russ Johnson
Testlab Manager
Tripwire, Inc.
From rt at theoesters.com Mon Jul 2 19:26:55 2001
From: rt at theoesters.com (Phil Oester)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:26:55 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] correspondence problem
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Ok, turns out the mailer I was using to send tickets to the queue was
apparently sending bad header info, from which rt couldn't figure out who
the requestor was. When I send from outlook, everything is perfect.
Thanks - Phil
p.s. the mailer is NetScanTools Pro 2000
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse [mailto:jesse at fsck.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:38 PM
To: Phil Oester
Cc: rt-users at fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] correspondence problem
What scrips have you set up for your queues?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:37:09PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> I've recently installed rt 2.0, and almost everything is working fine.
> Incoming mail is processed, and ends up in the appropriate queue, web
> interface works, etc.
>
> I just can't get the 'reply' feature to actually send the mail. Sendmail
is
> properly configured on this server. I don't see any debugging info in my
> log directory which would point me to a solution for this. Anybody know
of
> any gotchas?
>
> -Phil
>
> p.s. read faq, email archives
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Mon Jul 2 20:22:38 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 10:22:38 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Control
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au>
Jesse wrote:
> > 3) As I mentioned, Several departments use RT, and at the moment I have
> > several seperate instances of RT installed. I'd much prefer to maintain
> > one single database, and still be able to delegate user account control to
> > the appropriate supervisors in the departments concerned, *without* them
> > being able to mess with the other queue's settings. Is this even remotely
> > possible?
> >
>
> The access control system is pretty flexible, but I'd need to know waht you mean by 'user account control' before I could give you a reasonable answer.
Quick example:
I set up two queues, "A" and "B". There are 2xN users, A1, A2... AN (and B
1..N).
There are also two managers, M-A and M-B.
Managers A and B are from completely seperate departments. Each of them
manage 20-40 staff, some of which are full time, with a considerable
turnover of casuals.
What I'd like for Manager A to be able to create users, but restrict
Manager A and their spawn to queue A, and preferably have them unaware of
queue B's existence. Is it possible to grant 'Create User' access to an
account, but have it's access restricted to a subset of the creator's
priveliges.
I hope that's clear. Ideas?
btw, thanks for the keywords explanation - I'll have a play with my shiny
new test install.
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 22:46:48 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:46:48 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Control
In-Reply-To: <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au>; from teo.dehesselle@uts.edu.au on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:22:38AM +1000
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com> <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010702224648.N25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Well, you can grant createuser to both managers and then only grant
"AdminACL" to each manager for his respective queue. that should do
about what you want.
-j
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:22:38AM +1000, Teo de Hesselle wrote:
> Jesse wrote:
>
> > > 3) As I mentioned, Several departments use RT, and at the moment I have
> > > several seperate instances of RT installed. I'd much prefer to maintain
> > > one single database, and still be able to delegate user account control to
> > > the appropriate supervisors in the departments concerned, *without* them
> > > being able to mess with the other queue's settings. Is this even remotely
> > > possible?
> > >
> >
> > The access control system is pretty flexible, but I'd need to know waht you mean by 'user account control' before I could give you a reasonable answer.
>
> Quick example:
>
> I set up two queues, "A" and "B". There are 2xN users, A1, A2... AN (and B
> 1..N).
>
> There are also two managers, M-A and M-B.
>
> Managers A and B are from completely seperate departments. Each of them
> manage 20-40 staff, some of which are full time, with a considerable
> turnover of casuals.
>
> What I'd like for Manager A to be able to create users, but restrict
> Manager A and their spawn to queue A, and preferably have them unaware of
> queue B's existence. Is it possible to grant 'Create User' access to an
> account, but have it's access restricted to a subset of the creator's
> priveliges.
>
> I hope that's clear. Ideas?
>
> btw, thanks for the keywords explanation - I'll have a play with my shiny
> new test install.
>
> --
> T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
> Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
> | about surviving until Friday
> University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
And I'm told we do share some common rituals. Our "flame war" is apparently
held in person in their land and called "project meeting".
-Alan Cox [on "Suits"]
From jesse at fsck.com Mon Jul 2 22:54:02 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:54:02 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] errors in using rt2 .-(
In-Reply-To: <20010702123309.A3616@cephyr.cid.net>; from michael@thies.org on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:33:09PM +0200
References: <20010622142122.F20050@cephyr.cid.net> <20010622124706.F4501@pallas.fsck.com> <20010622191810.A14217@cephyr.cid.net> <993230763.12998.93.camel@zero.kgon.com> <20010623235629.D4691@cephyr.cid.net> <20010625120941.A19549@cephyr.cid.net> <20010625090652.K5992@pallas.fsck.com> <20010627115542.D27594@cephyr.cid.net> <20010627084945.O6253@pallas.fsck.com> <20010702123309.A3616@cephyr.cid.net>
Message-ID: <20010702225402.O25181@pallas.fsck.com>
hrm. Try commenting out the chown lines in webmux.pl and chowning the directory
for sessiondata manually?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:33:09PM +0200, Michael Thies wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we just installed perl 5.6.1, and I still have this Problem. .-(
> curiously the sessiondata-dir is owned by user 42 after a restart of apache.
> and it has groupid of nogroup (group running apache).
> sessiondata-dir has file in it (owned by nobody:nogroup).
> Doing a logout, I'm back logged in, as the last user .-(
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:49:45AM -0400, Jesse wrote:
> > That _sounds_ like an issue with your WebRT/sessiondata directory not
> > being properly writable or possibly your CGI::Cookie being out of date.
>
> the dir ist now (for testin purposes) chmod 777, nothing helped.
> And the CGI::Cookie is Version 1.18.
>
>
> I don't get it .-(
>
> Maybe anybody here, who could open my eyes again?
>
> TiA
> --
> \o/
> Michael Thies
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Transporters are so ungodly. if god had wanted us to travel great distances
instantaneously, he would have given us an internal
materialisation/dematerialisation control.
-- Shoshe Cole
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Tue Jul 3 00:16:49 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 14:16:49 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Control
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com> <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au> <20010702224648.N25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B414731.A9B982A6@uts.edu.au>
Jesse wrote:
>
> Well, you can grant createuser to both managers and then only grant
> "AdminACL" to each manager for his respective queue. that should do
> about what you want.
>
Yipee!
Sincerely, Thank you.
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Tue Jul 3 01:48:54 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 15:48:54 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Control
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com> <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au> <20010702224648.N25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B415CC6.7A7FFA37@uts.edu.au>
Jesse wrote:
>
> Well, you can grant createuser to both managers and then only grant
> "AdminACL" to each manager for his respective queue. that should do
> about what you want.
Yes, this should work well. Since there's only 'AdminUsers', I've just
handed over control of the entire RT database by doing this - there is now
nothing stopping manager-A from hijacking manager-B or root's account by
simply changing the password.
Fortunately the managers are neither brave nor 31337 enough to try it.
Perhaps a future version would at least stop them from manipulating any
"Super-User" accounts? Or even allow account manipulation in the same
group only?
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 3 01:52:35 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 01:52:35 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Control
In-Reply-To: <3B415CC6.7A7FFA37@uts.edu.au>; from teo.dehesselle@uts.edu.au on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:48:54PM +1000
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <20010702090140.T25181@pallas.fsck.com> <3B41104E.D04A6A07@uts.edu.au> <20010702224648.N25181@pallas.fsck.com> <3B415CC6.7A7FFA37@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010703015235.G25181@pallas.fsck.com>
That gets into rather more intense user managment scenarios than I really
want to deal with get into dealing with. I'm not really sure how to
deal with granting a user the ability to munge any aspect of a set of users'
accounts with zero access to another set of users without a MAJOR redesign
of the ACL system. :/
-j
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:48:54PM +1000, Teo de Hesselle wrote:
> Jesse wrote:
> >
> > Well, you can grant createuser to both managers and then only grant
> > "AdminACL" to each manager for his respective queue. that should do
> > about what you want.
>
> Yes, this should work well. Since there's only 'AdminUsers', I've just
> handed over control of the entire RT database by doing this - there is now
> nothing stopping manager-A from hijacking manager-B or root's account by
> simply changing the password.
>
> Fortunately the managers are neither brave nor 31337 enough to try it.
>
> Perhaps a future version would at least stop them from manipulating any
> "Super-User" accounts? Or even allow account manipulation in the same
> group only?
>
>
>
> --
> T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
> Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
> | about surviving until Friday
> University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
...realized that the entire structure of the net could be changed to be made
more efficient, elegant, and spontaneously make more money for everyone
involved. It's a marvelously simple diagram, but this form doesn't have a way
for me to draw it. It'll wait. -Adam Hirsch
From Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de Tue Jul 3 06:31:44 2001
From: Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de (Bernhard Schmalhofer)
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 12:31:44 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Icon for RequestTracker
Message-ID: <3B419F10.C29DBC89@biomax.de>
Hi all,
I'm just about promoting RequestTracker here at Biomax.
There is one thing I have been looking for at the RT site.
Is there a nice icon, which can be used for beautifying
links to RT?
--
*************************************************
Bernhard Schmalhofer
Software Engineer
Biomax Informatics AG
Lochhamer Str. 11
82152 Martinsried, Germany
Tel: +49 89 89 55 74 - 39
Fax: +49 89 89 55 74 - 25
mailto:Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de
http://www.biomax.de
*************************************************
From michael at thies.org Tue Jul 3 06:30:48 2001
From: michael at thies.org (Michael Thies)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:30:48 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] errors in using rt2 .-(
In-Reply-To: <20010702225402.O25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010703123048.K688@independence.p42.thies.org>
Hi all,
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:54:02PM -0400, Jesse wrote:
> hrm. Try commenting out the chown lines in webmux.pl and chowning the directory
> for sessiondata manually?
Done, but this fscking-Problem still is present.
OK, maybe we have to live with it, because I can perform a browser-shutdown,
if I have to really log out an log in with an other userid in rt.
Each Coworker has its own workstation, and can lock it if he has to.
Maybe some day, I get back at this problem, or we install it on a far more
up-to-date system.
Thanx.
Michael
From apeeters at lashout.net Tue Jul 3 09:54:02 2001
From: apeeters at lashout.net (Adriaan Peeters)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 15:54:02 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
Message-ID: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli>
Hey all,
Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the tickets
he's requestor for ?
This seems to be impossible right now :(
Regards,
Adriaan Peeters
From apeeters at pi.be Tue Jul 3 10:03:29 2001
From: apeeters at pi.be (Adriaan Peeters)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:03:29 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
Message-ID: <07dd01c103c8$efe688d0$0201000a@napoli>
Hey all,
Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the tickets
he's requestor for ?
This seems to be impossible right now :(
Regards,
Adriaan Peeters
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 3 10:08:27 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:08:27 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
In-Reply-To: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli>; from apeeters@lashout.net on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:54:02PM +0200
References: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli>
Message-ID: <20010703100827.L25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Grant either 'Everyone' or 'Requestor' the right to
'CommentOnTicket' and 'ReplyToTicket'
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:54:02PM +0200, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the tickets
> he's requestor for ?
> This seems to be impossible right now :(
>
> Regards,
> Adriaan Peeters
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
From apeeters at pi.be Tue Jul 3 10:23:16 2001
From: apeeters at pi.be (Adriaan Peeters)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:23:16 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
References: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli> <20010703100827.L25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <07f201c103cb$b6f37ee0$0201000a@napoli>
With these settings, I can view the ticket, but there is no comment/reply
link or field.
> Grant either 'Everyone' or 'Requestor' the right to
> 'CommentOnTicket' and 'ReplyToTicket'
>
> > Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the tickets
> > he's requestor for ?
> > This seems to be impossible right now :(
> >
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 3 10:24:29 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:24:29 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
In-Reply-To: <07f201c103cb$b6f37ee0$0201000a@napoli>; from apeeters@pi.be on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:23:16PM +0200
References: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli> <20010703100827.L25181@pallas.fsck.com> <07f201c103cb$b6f37ee0$0201000a@napoli>
Message-ID: <20010703102429.M25181@pallas.fsck.com>
*nod* The web ui for requestors wasn't really intended for them to
do ticket updates. It's somewhat of an oversight, but wouldn't be
too hard for someone to correct. The users should be able to mail in updates.
-j
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> With these settings, I can view the ticket, but there is no comment/reply
> link or field.
>
> > Grant either 'Everyone' or 'Requestor' the right to
> > 'CommentOnTicket' and 'ReplyToTicket'
> >
> > > Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the tickets
> > > he's requestor for ?
> > > This seems to be impossible right now :(
> > >
>
>
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From apeeters at pi.be Tue Jul 3 10:37:45 2001
From: apeeters at pi.be (Adriaan Peeters)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:37:45 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] unpriviledged RT2 user comment/reply
References: <079601c103c7$9e1695a0$0201000a@napoli> <20010703100827.L25181@pallas.fsck.com> <07f201c103cb$b6f37ee0$0201000a@napoli> <20010703102429.M25181@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <080301c103cd$b9cb1e00$0201000a@napoli>
Ah, k
It would be a great addition. It's a bit useless to be able to _view_ the
ticket, but not being able to add comments. Perhaps something for the
wishlist :) Add this, and you beat WonderDesk(c) :)
Adriaan
> *nod* The web ui for requestors wasn't really intended for them to
> do ticket updates. It's somewhat of an oversight, but wouldn't be
> too hard for someone to correct. The users should be able to mail in
updates.
>
> -j
>
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:23:16PM +0200, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> > With these settings, I can view the ticket, but there is no
comment/reply
> > link or field.
> >
> > > Grant either 'Everyone' or 'Requestor' the right to
> > > 'CommentOnTicket' and 'ReplyToTicket'
> > >
> > > > Is it possible for an unpriviledged user to comment/reply on the
tickets
> > > > he's requestor for ?
> > > > This seems to be impossible right now :(
> > > >
From damian at sentex.ca Tue Jul 3 11:18:55 2001
From: damian at sentex.ca (Damian Gerow)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:18:55 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding group members
Message-ID:
I've run into something a bit weird when adding group members.
I initially created a queue called "Support", a group called "Support", then
a user called "damian" to test with. Once I had satisfied myself that RT
was at least functional, I started creating users for other support people
to play with. When I tried to add them to the Support group, I get a
"Member added" message for each user, but no user was actually added. To
make sure it wasn't configuration, I removed myself, then tried to add
myself -- same thing. So I created another group -- same thing.
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 3 13:44:09 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:44:09 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Adding group members
In-Reply-To: ; from damian@sentex.ca on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:18:55AM -0400
References:
Message-ID: <20010703134409.F23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Have you granted the user the 'AdminGroups' right?
-j
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:18:55AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> I've run into something a bit weird when adding group members.
>
> I initially created a queue called "Support", a group called "Support", then
> a user called "damian" to test with. Once I had satisfied myself that RT
> was at least functional, I started creating users for other support people
> to play with. When I tried to add them to the Support group, I get a
> "Member added" message for each user, but no user was actually added. To
> make sure it wasn't configuration, I removed myself, then tried to add
> myself -- same thing. So I created another group -- same thing.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
"It's buried in the desert, got sand in it, melts Nazis. You know,
the Ark of the Covenant" -- siva
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 3 21:32:32 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 21:32:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Icon for RequestTracker
In-Reply-To: <3B419F10.C29DBC89@biomax.de>; from Bernhard.Schmalhofer@biomax.de on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:31:44PM +0200
References: <3B419F10.C29DBC89@biomax.de>
Message-ID: <20010703213232.L23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Sadly, there isn't. We don't even really have a logo these days. If folks
want to play and submit possibilities to me, I'd consider blessing one ;)
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:31:44PM +0200, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just about promoting RequestTracker here at Biomax.
> There is one thing I have been looking for at the RT site.
> Is there a nice icon, which can be used for beautifying
> links to RT?
>
> --
> *************************************************
> Bernhard Schmalhofer
> Software Engineer
> Biomax Informatics AG
> Lochhamer Str. 11
> 82152 Martinsried, Germany
> Tel: +49 89 89 55 74 - 39
> Fax: +49 89 89 55 74 - 25
> mailto:Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de
> http://www.biomax.de
> *************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
And I'm told we do share some common rituals. Our "flame war" is apparently
held in person in their land and called "project meeting".
-Alan Cox [on "Suits"]
From simon at campusonline.org Tue Jul 3 23:21:00 2001
From: simon at campusonline.org (Simon Auyeung)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:21:00 +0800
Subject: [rt-users] Chinese support
Message-ID:
Hi,
I wonder if RT2 has any support for chinese language support for input via
GB and/or Big5 encoding. I'm new to the mailing list and I can't any FAQ
talking about it.
-Simon
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Wed Jul 4 09:34:20 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:34:20
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
hello,
I just installed all pre-requiries:
perl testdeps -warn mysql
Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
Checking for HTML::Entities...found
Checking for MLDBM...found
Checking for Net::Domain...found
Checking for Net::SMTP...found
Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
Checking for Date::Parse...found
Checking for Date::Format...found
Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
Checking for Text::Template...found
Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
Checking for Errno...found
Checking for File::Temp...found
Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
this seems to be okay.. i also re-installed apache from the tarball with
mod_perl 1.25, I installed it as follows:
perl Makefile.PL \
EVERYTHING=1 \
APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.19/src \
USE_APACI=1 \
PREP_HTTPD=1 \
DO_HTTPD=1
make
make install
I installed apache as follows:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
--enable-module=vhost_alias --activate-module=src/modules/perl/libperl.a \
--enable-module=perl
make
make install
RT installed without any problems but when adding those four rules in apache
:
PerlModule Apache::DBI
PerlRequire /path/to/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
When I restart the webserver I get following error:
[Wed Jul 4 04:48:38 2001] [error] Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/ /etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line 14.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line 14.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
line 81.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
Syntax error on line 1244 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc
/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/
/etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line 14.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line 14.
Compilation failed in require at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
line 81.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
Can someone help me with this?
Thank you very much!
lao
lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
From B.Toonk at zx.nl Wed Jul 4 08:21:31 2001
From: B.Toonk at zx.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:21:31 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Charset ?
Message-ID: <01070414213102.00711@bas>
Hi,
Somebody came to me complaining about charset of the email's rt sends.
I use v 2.0 and the mail have charset us-ascii. But he uses outlook (i dont
know a version number) but he can't read rt's mail.
Wat can i do about it ?
Mvg. Bas Toonk
From stephenfeather at techrequest.com Wed Jul 4 08:30:27 2001
From: stephenfeather at techrequest.com (Stephen Feather)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 08:30:27 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID: <000001c10485$1c3ff6c0$0a00000a@wolf>
Looks like you need to install at least one more module, namely
Storable.pm
-----Original Message-----
From: rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com
[mailto:rt-users-admin at lists.fsck.com] On Behalf Of lao nightwolf
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:34 AM
To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Syntax error on line 1244 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
From Gerd.Nienhaus at orthogon.de Wed Jul 4 10:53:57 2001
From: Gerd.Nienhaus at orthogon.de (Gerd Nienhaus)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:53:57 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] rt 2.0.0 and Apache::Cookie ?
Message-ID: <3B432E05.2C79C0E5@orthogon.de>
hello rt fans :) !
I just upgraded from rt 1.3.81 to 2.0.0, but I was not able to bring
up the web interface :(.
The first problem occured in webmux.pl line 76, because Apache::Cookie
could not be located on my machine ?!?!
Then I installed it by hand with the cpan shell.
After doing so the apache server started again :), but when I tried
to enter the rt web interface this did not work.
The following message could be found in the http log file...
[Wed Jul 4 12:17:55 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine
&Apache::Cookie::Parse c
alled at /usr/local/httpd/cgi-bin/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line 124.
With my little basic knowledge of perl and all this stuff, I only
can see that in my Cookie.pm there does not exist any 'Parse' subroutine
!?!
Any ideas what's going on here ?
uuuhhps...;-) I just changed line 124 and use 'parse' instead of 'Parse'
and everything works fine now :) !
Is that a bug in (my) webmux.pl ???
Thanks for your help and regards from Germany and...
Gerd.
--
+------------------------ Gerd Nienhaus --------------------------+
| Orthogon GmbH, Hastedter Osterdeich 222, D-28207 Bremen |
| E-Mail: Gerd Nienhaus |
+---- Tel.: +49 (0)421 20122-0/-53, FAX: +49 (0)421 20122-999 ----+
ORTHOGON and ODS Toolbox are registered trademarks of Orthogon GmbH
From jesse at fsck.com Wed Jul 4 12:01:25 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:01:25 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] rt 2.0.0 and Apache::Cookie ?
In-Reply-To: <3B432E05.2C79C0E5@orthogon.de>; from Gerd.Nienhaus@orthogon.de on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:53:57PM +0200
References: <3B432E05.2C79C0E5@orthogon.de>
Message-ID: <20010704120125.O23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Did you update to the released 2.0 or the current CVS sources?
You should never upgrade to the head of the CVS tree if you're lookng
for stable production code.
-j
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:53:57PM +0200, Gerd Nienhaus wrote:
> hello rt fans :) !
>
> I just upgraded from rt 1.3.81 to 2.0.0, but I was not able to bring
> up the web interface :(.
>
> The first problem occured in webmux.pl line 76, because Apache::Cookie
> could not be located on my machine ?!?!
>
> Then I installed it by hand with the cpan shell.
>
> After doing so the apache server started again :), but when I tried
> to enter the rt web interface this did not work.
>
> The following message could be found in the http log file...
>
> [Wed Jul 4 12:17:55 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine
> &Apache::Cookie::Parse c
> alled at /usr/local/httpd/cgi-bin/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line 124.
>
> With my little basic knowledge of perl and all this stuff, I only
> can see that in my Cookie.pm there does not exist any 'Parse' subroutine
> !?!
>
> Any ideas what's going on here ?
>
> uuuhhps...;-) I just changed line 124 and use 'parse' instead of 'Parse'
> and everything works fine now :) !
>
> Is that a bug in (my) webmux.pl ???
>
> Thanks for your help and regards from Germany and...
>
> Gerd.
>
> --
> +------------------------ Gerd Nienhaus --------------------------+
> | Orthogon GmbH, Hastedter Osterdeich 222, D-28207 Bremen |
> | E-Mail: Gerd Nienhaus |
> +---- Tel.: +49 (0)421 20122-0/-53, FAX: +49 (0)421 20122-999 ----+
>
> ORTHOGON and ODS Toolbox are registered trademarks of Orthogon GmbH
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
From damian at sentex.ca Wed Jul 4 17:20:32 2001
From: damian at sentex.ca (Damian Gerow)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 17:20:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Owner correspondance
Message-ID:
Quick question: is it possible to have the owner correspond with the ticket
via e-mail:
In that:
1 - Bubba sends in an email to queue Support, saying "My email doesn't
work."
2 - All the watchers are notified.
3 - RT2 user Hank is the first to respond, jumps on the web, creates a reply
saying, "Well, it worked this time.", and takes ownership of the ticket.
4 - Bubba then gets that notification (a la wonderful, wonderful magic of
scrips), responds to it saying, "But I can't e-mail my sister about the
family reunion.".
5 - Hank (again, by the wonderful, wonderful magic of scrips) receives
notification, but for some reason, his web browser doesn't work right now.
So he responds to the e-mail saying, "Just walk across the hall and ask
her."
At this point, it would be nice for that correspondance to be entered into
the RT database, and have Bubba updated with the new correspondance.
However, we get a [Subject: Correspondance not recorded] [Body: Permission
Denied] message. I've set up permissions on the queue Support to allow the
Owner to "Comment on Ticket", "Own Ticket", and "Reply to Ticket" (amongst a
few others).
Looking at the owner, it (in the example given) would be set to user "hank".
The correspondance via e-mail would not be coming from "hank" but "Hank
McCoy " (though "hank"'s e-mail address would be set to
hank at dumpster.com).
Is there anyway to do this.
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Wed Jul 4 18:19:15 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 00:19:15 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
Message-ID:
Hi,
Quick question: I?ve installed RT 2.0 (no upgrade), everything went fine
(creating database, dependencies, etc.)
and I am also able to enter the login webpage of RT.
However, I can?t login, even by using the default "root" account with
"password" and even when I create my own user
by using the rtadmin --user create command from the shell.
Any ideas are appreciated!!!
Thanks
Lars
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 00:57:02 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 00:57:02 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Owner correspondance
In-Reply-To: ; from damian@sentex.ca on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:20:32PM -0400
References:
Message-ID: <20010705005702.P23751@pallas.fsck.com>
That should just work. does RT seem to create two accounts for hank? (Does
it autocreate a non-privileged account?) One option is to configure RT2 like
RT1 was and just grant 'everyone' 'ReplyToTicket' and 'CommentOnTicket'
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:20:32PM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> Quick question: is it possible to have the owner correspond with the ticket
> via e-mail:
>
> In that:
>
> 1 - Bubba sends in an email to queue Support, saying "My email doesn't
> work."
> 2 - All the watchers are notified.
> 3 - RT2 user Hank is the first to respond, jumps on the web, creates a reply
> saying, "Well, it worked this time.", and takes ownership of the ticket.
> 4 - Bubba then gets that notification (a la wonderful, wonderful magic of
> scrips), responds to it saying, "But I can't e-mail my sister about the
> family reunion.".
> 5 - Hank (again, by the wonderful, wonderful magic of scrips) receives
> notification, but for some reason, his web browser doesn't work right now.
> So he responds to the e-mail saying, "Just walk across the hall and ask
> her."
>
> At this point, it would be nice for that correspondance to be entered into
> the RT database, and have Bubba updated with the new correspondance.
> However, we get a [Subject: Correspondance not recorded] [Body: Permission
> Denied] message. I've set up permissions on the queue Support to allow the
> Owner to "Comment on Ticket", "Own Ticket", and "Reply to Ticket" (amongst a
> few others).
>
> Looking at the owner, it (in the example given) would be set to user "hank".
> The correspondance via e-mail would not be coming from "hank" but "Hank
> McCoy " (though "hank"'s e-mail address would be set to
> hank at dumpster.com).
>
> Is there anyway to do this.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 01:05:56 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 01:05:56 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
In-Reply-To: ; from lleuchter@germany.ea.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:19:15AM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20010705010556.R23751@pallas.fsck.com>
I suspect that you either don't have cookies enabled in your browser OR
your mod_perl is of a vintage that breaks CGI::Cookie.
http://fsck.com/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=633 (login guest/guest)
Describes the fix for this that will be in 2.0.1
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 12:19:15AM +0200, Leuchter, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question: I?ve installed RT 2.0 (no upgrade), everything went fine
> (creating database, dependencies, etc.)
> and I am also able to enter the login webpage of RT.
> However, I can?t login, even by using the default "root" account with
> "password" and even when I create my own user
> by using the rtadmin --user create command from the shell.
>
> Any ideas are appreciated!!!
>
> Thanks
> Lars
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From chris at harvestroad.com Thu Jul 5 01:13:38 2001
From: chris at harvestroad.com (Chris Waltham)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:13:38 +0800
Subject: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
In-Reply-To: <20010705010556.R23751@pallas.fsck.com>
References:
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705131253.02ef5530@spinach.harvestroad.com>
>I suspect that you either don't have cookies enabled in your browser OR
>your mod_perl is of a vintage that breaks CGI::Cookie.
On the subject of mod_perl, does the testdeps script check it for
existence/sanity?
Chris
away from RT-installed PCs for a while
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 01:20:33 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 01:20:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705131253.02ef5530@spinach.harvestroad.com>; from chris@harvestroad.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:13:38PM +0800
References: <20010705010556.R23751@pallas.fsck.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010705131253.02ef5530@spinach.harvestroad.com>
Message-ID: <20010705012033.S23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Checking mod_perl is sort of outside of the scope of things
I'm really up for dealing with in testdeps, though I'd certainly
appreciate a patch, if anyone's willing to put the code together.
For me, it falls into the 'document it as a requirement' category.
All that being said, I expect that mod_perl won't be a hard requirement
for the web ui for much longer. I've got the fastcgi handler spitting out
attachments properly at this point. All that's left now is to deal with
things like the little RT logo and making sure that things are taint-happy
(there are some patches that need to be applied.) Then, well, I won't
recommend that folks drop it straight into production, but it will at least
be an option.
-j
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:13:38PM +0800, Chris Waltham wrote:
>
> >I suspect that you either don't have cookies enabled in your browser OR
> >your mod_perl is of a vintage that breaks CGI::Cookie.
>
> On the subject of mod_perl, does the testdeps script check it for
> existence/sanity?
>
>
> Chris
> away from RT-installed PCs for a while
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
'"As the company that brought users the Internet, Netscape is now inviting
the more than 60 million people who have used our client software to
'tune up' and upgrade to Netscape Communicator," said Mike Homer,
senior vice president of marketing at Netscape.' Sometimes I wonder.
From Gerd.Nienhaus at orthogon.de Thu Jul 5 01:55:27 2001
From: Gerd.Nienhaus at orthogon.de (Gerd Nienhaus)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 07:55:27 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] rt 2.0.0 and Apache::Cookie ?
References: <3B432E05.2C79C0E5@orthogon.de> <20010704120125.O23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B44014F.2D5BCC04@orthogon.de>
hallalieh !
Jesse wrote:
>
> Did you update to the released 2.0 or the current CVS sources?
> You should never upgrade to the head of the CVS tree if you're lookng
> for stable production code.
Thanks for that information Jesse !
I just updated to the current CVS sources, because we are in the stage
of
evaluating a new support line system and RT 2 seems to be currently the
best candidate :).
Therefore I am not only looking for a stable version, but I want to
learn
how all this works together :).
And the best way to learn something is by making errors ;) !
Sorry if I wasted someones time, I just sent the email, to point
you to this 'problem', that I fortunately was able to solve by myself
:).
Kind regards from Germany and...
Gerd.
--
+------------------------ Gerd Nienhaus --------------------------+
| Orthogon GmbH, Hastedter Osterdeich 222, D-28207 Bremen |
| E-Mail: Gerd Nienhaus |
+---- Tel.: +49 (0)421 20122-0/-53, FAX: +49 (0)421 20122-999 ----+
ORTHOGON and ODS Toolbox are registered trademarks of Orthogon GmbH
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Thu Jul 5 02:27:43 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:27:43 +0200
Subject: AW: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
Message-ID:
testdeps shows everything is fine:
[root at creed rt]# make testdeps | more
/usr/bin/perl ./tools/testdeps -warn mysql
Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
Checking for HTML::Entities...found
Checking for MLDBM...found
Checking for Net::Domain...found
Checking for Net::SMTP...found
Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
Checking for Date::Parse...found
Checking for Date::Format...found
Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
Checking for Text::Template...found
Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
Checking for Errno...found
Checking for File::Temp...found
Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Chris Waltham [mailto:chris at harvestroad.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2001 07:14
An: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Betreff: Re: [rt-users] Unable to login (2.0)
>I suspect that you either don't have cookies enabled in your browser OR
>your mod_perl is of a vintage that breaks CGI::Cookie.
On the subject of mod_perl, does the testdeps script check it for
existence/sanity?
Chris
away from RT-installed PCs for a while
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
From chris at harvestroad.com Thu Jul 5 02:45:42 2001
From: chris at harvestroad.com (Chris Waltham)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:45:42 +0800
Subject: [rt-users] Problems upgrading 1.0.7 to 2.0.0
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705144435.02ef32d0@spinach.harvestroad.com>
hi guys,
i'm getting the following error during a make install of rt-2.0.0:
Creating mysql database rt2.
cp etc/acl.mysql '/usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql'
/usr/local/bin/perl -p -i -e " s'!!DB_TYPE!!'mysql'g;\
s'!!DB_HOST!!'localhost'g;\
s'!!DB_RT_PASS!!'My!word%z0t'g;\
s'!!DB_RT_HOST!!'localhost'g;\
s'!!DB_RT_USER!!'rt_user'g;\
s'!!DB_DATABASE!!'rt2'g;" /usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql
bin/initacls.mysql '/usr/local/mysql' 'localhost' 'root' 'O4Peace' 'rt2'
'/usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql'
Enter the mysql administrator's database password to create a new user for RT
Enter the mysql administrator's database password to nondestructively
reload the database
/usr/local/bin/perl tools/initdb 'mysql' '/usr/local/mysql' 'localhost'
'rt_user' 'rt2' insert
Now populating database schema.
Enter the mysql password for rt_user:
Creating database schema.
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Column 'Keyword' is used with UNIQUE or
INDEX but is not defined as NOT NULL at tools/initdb line 160,
line 258.
Problem with statement:
CREATE TABLE KeywordSelects (
id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
Name varchar(255) NULL ,
Keyword integer NULL ,
Single integer NULL ,
Depth integer NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 ,
ObjectType varchar(32) NOT NULL ,
ObjectField varchar(32) NULL ,
ObjectValue varchar(255) NULL ,
Disabled int2 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 ,
PRIMARY KEY (id),
INDEX (Keyword),
INDEX (ObjectType, ObjectField, ObjectValue)
)
Column 'Keyword' is used with UNIQUE or INDEX but is not defined as NOT
NULL at tools/initdb line 162, line 258.
make: *** [initdb.rtuser] Error 255
--
i've just installed mod_perl (as a DSO, built apache ages ago and couldn't be
bothered doing it again), and make testdeps says nothing out of the ordinary.
rt-1.0.7 continues to work fine.. any ideas?
cheers,
Chris
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Thu Jul 5 07:12:06 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 07:12:06
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
Hello,
After installing the Storable.pm module I don't get any error message
anymore while restarting apache or doing a configtest of it (i'll get syntax
ok)
this is my httpd.conf entry:
DocumentRoot "/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/WebRT/html"
ServerName ticket.domain.com
PerlModule Apache::DBI
#PerlRequire /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
When I request the webui on my browser I get 'internal server error'. Very
difficult now to find a solution on what's wrong.
What I know is when installing the CPAN prerequiries I had three modules who
failed if I did a make test.
These were:
IO-stringy
HTML::Parser
MIME::tools
Could this have something to do with it? They're installed and found by
testdeps...
I'm getting pretty desperate now..
Thanks for any help that follows!
lao
>
>hello,
>
>I just installed all pre-requiries:
>
>perl testdeps -warn mysql
>Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
>Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
>Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
>Checking for HTML::Entities...found
>Checking for MLDBM...found
>Checking for Net::Domain...found
>Checking for Net::SMTP...found
>Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
>Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
>Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
>Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
>Checking for Date::Parse...found
>Checking for Date::Format...found
>Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
>Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
>Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
>Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
>Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
>Checking for Text::Template...found
>Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
>Checking for Errno...found
>Checking for File::Temp...found
>Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
>Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
>
>this seems to be okay.. i also re-installed apache from the tarball with
>mod_perl 1.25, I installed it as follows:
>
>perl Makefile.PL \
>EVERYTHING=1 \
>APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.19/src \
>USE_APACI=1 \
>PREP_HTTPD=1 \
>DO_HTTPD=1
>
>make
>make install
>
>I installed apache as follows:
>
>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
>--enable-module=vhost_alias --activate-module=src/modules/perl/libperl.a \
>--enable-module=perl
>make
>make install
>
>RT installed without any problems but when adding those four rules in
>apache
>:
>
>PerlModule Apache::DBI
>PerlRequire /path/to/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>SetHandler perl-script
>PerlHandler RT::Mason
>
>When I restart the webserver I get following error:
>
>[Wed Jul 4 04:48:38 2001] [error] Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC
>contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib
>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/ /etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>14.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>14.
>Compilation failed in require at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>81.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>line 81.
>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>
>Syntax error on line 1244 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
>Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc
>/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux
>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/
>/etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>14.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>14.
>Compilation failed in require at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>81.
>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>line 81.
>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>
>
>Can someone help me with this?
>
>Thank you very much!
>
>lao
>lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rt-users mailing list
>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Thu Jul 5 07:44:37 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 07:44:37
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
Hello,
I check the compilation of HTML::Mason module again and while running make
test I get following errors:
[root at rock HTML-Mason-1.03]# make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib
-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 -e 'use
Test::Harness qw(&runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; $ENV{MASON_VERBOSE}=0;
$ENV{MASON_VERBOSE}=0; $ENV{PORT}=80;
$ENV{APACHE_DIR}=q^/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t^; runtests @ARGV;' t/*.t
t/01-syntax.........ok
t/02-sections.......ok
t/03-mc.............ok
t/04-misc...........ok
t/05-request........ok
t/06-parser.........ok
t/07-interp.........ok
t/08-ah.............
Testing whether Apache can be started
Waiting for httpd to start.
Killing httpd process (6601)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -DCGI -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............NOK 13Killing httpd process (6608)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -DCGI_no_handler -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............NOK 23Killing httpd process (6617)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -Dmulti_config -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............ok 27/27Killing httpd process (6625)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
FAILED tests 1-7, 10-17, 19-26
Failed 23/27 tests, 14.81% okay
t/09-component......ok
t/10-cache..........ok
t/11-inherit........ok
t/12-taint..........ok
t/13-errors.........ok
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/08-ah.t 27 23 85.19% 1-7, 10-17, 19-26
Failed 1/13 test scripts, 92.31% okay. 23/115 subtests failed, 80.00% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Does someone know if this has something to do with my problem?
Thank you!
lao
>
>Hello,
>
>After installing the Storable.pm module I don't get any error message
>anymore while restarting apache or doing a configtest of it (i'll get
>syntax
>ok)
>
>this is my httpd.conf entry:
>
>
>DocumentRoot "/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/WebRT/html"
>ServerName ticket.domain.com
>PerlModule Apache::DBI
>#PerlRequire /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>SetHandler perl-script
>PerlHandler RT::Mason
>
>
>When I request the webui on my browser I get 'internal server error'. Very
>difficult now to find a solution on what's wrong.
>
>What I know is when installing the CPAN prerequiries I had three modules
>who
>failed if I did a make test.
>
>These were:
>
>IO-stringy
>HTML::Parser
>MIME::tools
>
>Could this have something to do with it? They're installed and found by
>testdeps...
>
>I'm getting pretty desperate now..
>
>Thanks for any help that follows!
>lao
>
>
>>
>>hello,
>>
>>I just installed all pre-requiries:
>>
>>perl testdeps -warn mysql
>>Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
>>Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
>>Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
>>Checking for HTML::Entities...found
>>Checking for MLDBM...found
>>Checking for Net::Domain...found
>>Checking for Net::SMTP...found
>>Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
>>Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
>>Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
>>Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
>>Checking for Date::Parse...found
>>Checking for Date::Format...found
>>Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
>>Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
>>Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
>>Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
>>Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
>>Checking for Text::Template...found
>>Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
>>Checking for Errno...found
>>Checking for File::Temp...found
>>Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
>>Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
>>
>>this seems to be okay.. i also re-installed apache from the tarball with
>>mod_perl 1.25, I installed it as follows:
>>
>>perl Makefile.PL \
>>EVERYTHING=1 \
>>APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.19/src \
>>USE_APACI=1 \
>>PREP_HTTPD=1 \
>>DO_HTTPD=1
>>
>>make
>>make install
>>
>>I installed apache as follows:
>>
>>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
>>--enable-module=vhost_alias --activate-module=src/modules/perl/libperl.a \
>>--enable-module=perl
>>make
>>make install
>>
>>RT installed without any problems but when adding those four rules in
>>apache
>>:
>>
>>PerlModule Apache::DBI
>>PerlRequire /path/to/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>SetHandler perl-script
>>PerlHandler RT::Mason
>>
>>When I restart the webserver I get following error:
>>
>>[Wed Jul 4 04:48:38 2001] [error] Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC
>>contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib
>>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/ /etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>Compilation failed in require at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>>81.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>line 81.
>>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>>
>>Syntax error on line 1244 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
>>Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc
>>/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux
>>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/
>>/etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>Compilation failed in require at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>>81.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>line 81.
>>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>>
>>
>>Can someone help me with this?
>>
>>Thank you very much!
>>
>>lao
>>lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rt-users mailing list
>>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rt-users mailing list
>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Thu Jul 5 07:24:04 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:24:04 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
hELLO,
If I look at my apache error_log then I see the following rule appear:
[Thu Jul 5 07:21:07 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine &HTML::Mason::handler called.
Everytime when I do a refresh of my browser I still get Internal Server Error.
Sorry for posting so much, but I hope you can do something with all this information to help me any further.
I also installed HTML::Mason version 0.896 instead of the final 1.03 where I got errors on .. with the 0.896 these errors are gone.
Thanks for any help!
Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: lao nightwolf
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:48 AM
To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Hello,
I check the compilation of HTML::Mason module again and while running make
test I get following errors:
[root at rock HTML-Mason-1.03]# make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib
-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 -e 'use
Test::Harness qw(&runtests $verbose); $verbose=0; $ENV{MASON_VERBOSE}=0;
$ENV{MASON_VERBOSE}=0; $ENV{PORT}=80;
$ENV{APACHE_DIR}=q^/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t^; runtests @ARGV;' t/*.t
t/01-syntax.........ok
t/02-sections.......ok
t/03-mc.............ok
t/04-misc...........ok
t/05-request........ok
t/06-parser.........ok
t/07-interp.........ok
t/08-ah.............
Testing whether Apache can be started
Waiting for httpd to start.
Killing httpd process (6601)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -DCGI -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............NOK 13Killing httpd process (6608)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -DCGI_no_handler -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............NOK 23Killing httpd process (6617)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
Executing /root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd -Dmulti_config -f
/root/HTML-Mason-1.03/t/httpd.conf
Waiting for httpd to start.
t/08-ah.............ok 27/27Killing httpd process (6625)
Waiting for previous httpd to shut down
FAILED tests 1-7, 10-17, 19-26
Failed 23/27 tests, 14.81% okay
t/09-component......ok
t/10-cache..........ok
t/11-inherit........ok
t/12-taint..........ok
t/13-errors.........ok
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/08-ah.t 27 23 85.19% 1-7, 10-17, 19-26
Failed 1/13 test scripts, 92.31% okay. 23/115 subtests failed, 80.00% okay.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 29
Does someone know if this has something to do with my problem?
Thank you!
lao
>
>Hello,
>
>After installing the Storable.pm module I don't get any error message
>anymore while restarting apache or doing a configtest of it (i'll get
>syntax
>ok)
>
>this is my httpd.conf entry:
>
>
>DocumentRoot "/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/WebRT/html"
>ServerName ticket.domain.com
>PerlModule Apache::DBI
>#PerlRequire /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>SetHandler perl-script
>PerlHandler RT::Mason
>
>
>When I request the webui on my browser I get 'internal server error'. Very
>difficult now to find a solution on what's wrong.
>
>What I know is when installing the CPAN prerequiries I had three modules
>who
>failed if I did a make test.
>
>These were:
>
>IO-stringy
>HTML::Parser
>MIME::tools
>
>Could this have something to do with it? They're installed and found by
>testdeps...
>
>I'm getting pretty desperate now..
>
>Thanks for any help that follows!
>lao
>
>
>>
>>hello,
>>
>>I just installed all pre-requiries:
>>
>>perl testdeps -warn mysql
>>Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
>>Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
>>Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
>>Checking for HTML::Entities...found
>>Checking for MLDBM...found
>>Checking for Net::Domain...found
>>Checking for Net::SMTP...found
>>Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
>>Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
>>Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
>>Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
>>Checking for Date::Parse...found
>>Checking for Date::Format...found
>>Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
>>Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
>>Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
>>Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
>>Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
>>Checking for Text::Template...found
>>Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
>>Checking for Errno...found
>>Checking for File::Temp...found
>>Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
>>Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
>>
>>this seems to be okay.. i also re-installed apache from the tarball with
>>mod_perl 1.25, I installed it as follows:
>>
>>perl Makefile.PL \
>>EVERYTHING=1 \
>>APACHE_SRC=../apache_1.3.19/src \
>>USE_APACI=1 \
>>PREP_HTTPD=1 \
>>DO_HTTPD=1
>>
>>make
>>make install
>>
>>I installed apache as follows:
>>
>>./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so
>>--enable-module=vhost_alias --activate-module=src/modules/perl/libperl.a \
>>--enable-module=perl
>>make
>>make install
>>
>>RT installed without any problems but when adding those four rules in
>>apache
>>:
>>
>>PerlModule Apache::DBI
>>PerlRequire /path/to/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>SetHandler perl-script
>>PerlHandler RT::Mason
>>
>>When I restart the webserver I get following error:
>>
>>[Wed Jul 4 04:48:38 2001] [error] Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC
>>contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib
>>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/ /etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>Compilation failed in require at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>>81.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>line 81.
>>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>>
>>Syntax error on line 1244 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
>>Can't locate Storable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/etc
>>/etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux
>>/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl . /etc/httpd/
>>/etc/httpd/lib/perl) at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/Serialize/Storable.pm line
>>14.
>>Compilation failed in require at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/Apache/Session/File.pm line 22.
>>Compilation failed in require at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl line
>>81.
>>BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
>>line 81.
>>Compilation failed in require at (eval 5) line 1.
>>
>>
>>Can someone help me with this?
>>
>>Thank you very much!
>>
>>lao
>>lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>rt-users mailing list
>>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>rt-users mailing list
>rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From alec.cormack at city-link.co.uk Thu Jul 5 08:21:36 2001
From: alec.cormack at city-link.co.uk (Alec Cormack)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:21:36 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Email calls to RT with multiple requestors?
Message-ID: <015201c1054d$090c3460$c896a8c0@city.lnk>
If I create a request through the RT web interface I can have 2 or more requestors. I would like to do this with calls emailed to RT (version 2.0). Is this possible? I have tried playing with the email reply to field - but I can't work out the syntax.
Please can someone help?
Alec Cormack
email: Alec.cormack at city-link.co.uk
_____________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the
individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
confidential information. If you have received this message in
error or there are any problems, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the message from your computer. The
unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this
message is forbidden. This message has been checked for all
known viruses by Initial City Link prior to sending.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From hwagener at fcb-wilkens.com Thu Jul 5 09:18:07 2001
From: hwagener at fcb-wilkens.com (Harald Wagener)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:18:07 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Another questions
Message-ID: <3B44690F.7C1E87F3@fcb-wilkens.com>
OK, I have set up RT2 so that everyone is granted CreateTickets and
SeeQueue. As well, Requestors are granted ShowTicket and and SeeQueue.
But users cannot login - they get an error that their username/or password
is wrong.
in the docs, I found that nonprivileged users cannot log into the web
interface. How can I change RT2's behavior so unprivileged users can see
the queue (this is partly because we want to show some users that we do
work on things, as we are commenting on and replying to tickets heavily to
document what and how stuff is done)?
Regards,
H.
--
Harald Wagener | Systemadministrator
FCB/Wilkens GmbH | Tel.:+49-40-2881-1252
An der Alster 42 | Fax.:+49-40-2881-1263
20099 Hamburg | http://www.fcb-wilkens.com
From khera at kcilink.com Thu Jul 5 10:12:18 2001
From: khera at kcilink.com (Vivek Khera)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:12:18 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <15172.30146.196787.734595@onceler.kciLink.com>
>>>>> "ln" == lao nightwolf writes:
ln> When I request the webui on my browser I get 'internal server
ln> error'. Very difficult now to find a solution on what's wrong.
What does your web server error log file say when this happens?
Mod_perl is pretty good about logging errors in the perl side of
things.
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Thu Jul 5 10:18:52 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:18:52 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
this is what my log says.. I don't get any further with it, though with my knowledge..
thanks for helping me!
[Thu Jul 5 10:01:08 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine &HTML::Mason::handler called.
----- Original Message -----
From: Vivek Khera
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:18 PM
To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
>>>>> "ln" == lao nightwolf writes:
ln> When I request the webui on my browser I get 'internal server
ln> error'. Very difficult now to find a solution on what's wrong.
What does your web server error log file say when this happens?
Mod_perl is pretty good about logging errors in the perl side of
things.
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From damian at sentex.ca Thu Jul 5 10:23:58 2001
From: damian at sentex.ca (Damian Gerow)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:23:58 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Owner correspondance
In-Reply-To: <20010705005702.P23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
> That should just work. does RT seem to create two accounts for
> hank? (Does
> it autocreate a non-privileged account?) One option is to
> configure RT2 like
> RT1 was and just grant 'everyone' 'ReplyToTicket' and 'CommentOnTicket'
Yes it does create a second account -- it's because the e-mail address for
the user is (would be) set to "hank at dumpster.ca", whereas his reply e-mail
address is "hank at dumpster.com".
Which leads to another question -- are there plans for a user to have >1
e-mail addresses?
From khera at kcilink.com Thu Jul 5 10:24:46 2001
From: khera at kcilink.com (Vivek Khera)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:24:46 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID: <15172.30894.195480.126141@onceler.kciLink.com>
>>>>> "ln" == lao nightwolf writes:
ln> this is what my log says.. I don't get any further with it, though with my knowledge..
ln> thanks for helping me!
ln> [Thu Jul 5 10:01:08 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine &HTML::Mason::handler called.
You need to ensure that HTML::Mason is loaded into your server.
Either you must do a "PerlModule HTML::Mason" or require it via some
other module that gets loaded by mod_perl.
When you start your server, does it display any error messages or
write any error messages to the logs?
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 11:09:55 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:09:55 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Problems upgrading 1.0.7 to 2.0.0
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705144435.02ef32d0@spinach.harvestroad.com>; from chris@harvestroad.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:45:42PM +0800
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705144435.02ef32d0@spinach.harvestroad.com>
Message-ID: <20010705110955.Z23751@pallas.fsck.com>
RT 2.0 requires mysql 3.23. You're running mysql 3.22
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:45:42PM +0800, Chris Waltham wrote:
> hi guys,
>
> i'm getting the following error during a make install of rt-2.0.0:
>
> Creating mysql database rt2.
> cp etc/acl.mysql '/usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql'
> /usr/local/bin/perl -p -i -e " s'!!DB_TYPE!!'mysql'g;\
> s'!!DB_HOST!!'localhost'g;\
> s'!!DB_RT_PASS!!'My!word%z0t'g;\
> s'!!DB_RT_HOST!!'localhost'g;\
> s'!!DB_RT_USER!!'rt_user'g;\
> s'!!DB_DATABASE!!'rt2'g;" /usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql
> bin/initacls.mysql '/usr/local/mysql' 'localhost' 'root' 'O4Peace' 'rt2'
> '/usr/local/rt/etc/acl.mysql'
> Enter the mysql administrator's database password to create a new user for RT
> Enter the mysql administrator's database password to nondestructively
> reload the database
> /usr/local/bin/perl tools/initdb 'mysql' '/usr/local/mysql' 'localhost'
> 'rt_user' 'rt2' insert
> Now populating database schema.
> Enter the mysql password for rt_user:
> Creating database schema.
> DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Column 'Keyword' is used with UNIQUE or
> INDEX but is not defined as NOT NULL at tools/initdb line 160,
> line 258.
> Problem with statement:
> CREATE TABLE KeywordSelects (
> id INTEGER NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
> Name varchar(255) NULL ,
> Keyword integer NULL ,
> Single integer NULL ,
> Depth integer NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 ,
> ObjectType varchar(32) NOT NULL ,
> ObjectField varchar(32) NULL ,
> ObjectValue varchar(255) NULL ,
> Disabled int2 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 ,
> PRIMARY KEY (id),
> INDEX (Keyword),
> INDEX (ObjectType, ObjectField, ObjectValue)
> )
>
> Column 'Keyword' is used with UNIQUE or INDEX but is not defined as NOT
> NULL at tools/initdb line 162, line 258.
> make: *** [initdb.rtuser] Error 255
>
> --
>
> i've just installed mod_perl (as a DSO, built apache ages ago and couldn't be
> bothered doing it again), and make testdeps says nothing out of the ordinary.
>
> rt-1.0.7 continues to work fine.. any ideas?
>
> cheers,
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
pretty soon we're going to HAVE to have hypertext mail!
--Tim Berners Lee. (8 Jan 1993 on www-talk)
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 11:13:36 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:13:36 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Email calls to RT with multiple requestors?
In-Reply-To: <015201c1054d$090c3460$c896a8c0@city.lnk>; from alec.cormack@city-link.co.uk on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:21:36PM +0100
References: <015201c1054d$090c3460$c896a8c0@city.lnk>
Message-ID: <20010705111336.B23751@pallas.fsck.com>
You might want to look at the enhanced-mailgate in
ftp://ftp.fsck.com/pub/rt/contrib/2.0/rt-addons/
It would allow you to embed pseudo-headers in the message like
RT-Requestor: jane at example.com
RT-Requestor: john at sample.com
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:21:36PM +0100, Alec Cormack wrote:
> If I create a request through the RT web interface I can have 2 or more requestors. I would like to do this with calls emailed to RT (version 2.0). Is this possible? I have tried playing with the email reply to field - but I can't work out the syntax.
>
> Please can someone help?
>
> Alec Cormack
> email: Alec.cormack at city-link.co.uk
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the
> individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and
> confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error or there are any problems, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the message from your computer. The
> unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this
> message is forbidden. This message has been checked for all
> known viruses by Initial City Link prior to sending.
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Any e-mail sent to the SLA will immediately become the intellectual property
of the SLA and the author of said message will enter into a period of
indentured servitude which will last for a period of time no less than seven
years.
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 11:22:08 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:22:08 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Owner correspondance
In-Reply-To: ; from damian@sentex.ca on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:23:58AM -0400
References: <20010705005702.P23751@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010705112208.D23751@pallas.fsck.com>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:23:58AM -0400, Damian Gerow wrote:
> > That should just work. does RT seem to create two accounts for
> > hank? (Does
> > it autocreate a non-privileged account?) One option is to
> > configure RT2 like
> > RT1 was and just grant 'everyone' 'ReplyToTicket' and 'CommentOnTicket'
>
> Yes it does create a second account -- it's because the e-mail address for
> the user is (would be) set to "hank at dumpster.ca", whereas his reply e-mail
> address is "hank at dumpster.com".
Ok. the problem is that RT isn't smart enough to equate those two addresses
without you helping it out a bit in the config file. What you probably
want to do is to supply a regexp in the CanonicalizeAddress subroutine in
the configfile.
>
> Which leads to another question -- are there plans for a user to have >1
> e-mail addresses?
>
Longterm, possibly, but not in the immediate future.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
the point is that words were exchanged. neurolinguistic
programming will do the rest. they should be showing up at my house
any day now.
From jason at splitinfinity.net Thu Jul 5 16:03:28 2001
From: jason at splitinfinity.net (Split infinity Tech Support)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:03:28 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Message quoting
Message-ID: <20010705200402.DC131111DA@pallas.eruditorum.org>
How do I get rid of this and get RT to quote messages in the reply?
[Non-text message not quoted]
Jason
--
FREE Web Site Monitoring for ALL! 100% FREE!
http://www.ServerRat.com/tag/
Notifies you via: ICQ, AIM and EMAIL!
From rt-list at trevorsky.com Thu Jul 5 19:09:20 2001
From: rt-list at trevorsky.com (Trevor Sky Garside)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:09:20 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
Message-ID: <007f01c105a7$8639b250$0100a8c0@halcyon>
I have hacked my way through getting RT2 to install on my system, but I
can't get the Apache config to work properly. Apache appears to be ignoring
the Perl handler. Here is my VirtualHost line from httpd.conf:
DocumentRoot /opt/rt2/WebRT/html
ServerName rt.mydomainname
PerlModule Apache::DBI
PerlRequire /opt/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
ErrorLog /opt/rt2/logs/apache-error.log
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler RT::Mason
(I have removed my domain name and IP because I don't want random people
poking around an unfinished installation... ;)
I have confirmed that Apache is basically ignoring the SetHandler line
because it does the same thing no matter what is listed there -- at the
moment, it is set to SetHandler your-mom - no error flagged when apache
starts up, and it merely spits out the plain HTML instead of processing it
through Mason.
As a side note, I had *severe* trouble getting this program to install at
all. Does anybody have any installation notes from their RT2 install? I'd
like to see if others had the same troubles I did.
Installed on a RedHat 7.1 system, MySQL was installed using the RPMs.
Running make fixdeps actually downloaded and built a new Perl, which has
been an unrelated source of many headaches.
Thanks for any help anybody can provide.
Trevor Sky Garside
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 20:22:15 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:22:15 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
Message-ID: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
The following relates to rt 1.0.7.
I have to move RT from machine A to B... I did a fresh install and then
overwrote the new mysql database with the original... And I've now lost
access to the message bodies...
I've also copied the old transactions.... Help... users are screaming at
me...
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From rael at zero.kgon.com Thu Jul 5 20:30:40 2001
From: rael at zero.kgon.com (Karel P Kerezman)
Date: 05 Jul 2001 17:30:40 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <994379440.26256.5.camel@zero.kgon.com>
On 06 Jul 2001 10:22:15 +1000, Teo de Hesselle wrote:
> I have to move RT from machine A to B... I did a fresh install and then
> overwrote the new mysql database with the original... And I've now lost
> access to the message bodies...
>
> I've also copied the old transactions.... Help... users are screaming at
> me...
When I moved from one machine to another, I did a mysqldump out, built
the new RT 1.07 install, then piped in the dump file after excising the
bits that create tables and whatnot. It worked like a dream.
That probably doesn't help you very much, but it was how I went about
the process.
--
Karel P Kerezman - IS Admin, Entercom Portland - http://zero.kgon.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't dial 911 because he can't find '11' on the phone.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From the Canonical Fulldeckisms List: http://www.herbison.com/canon
From allbery at ece.cmu.edu Thu Jul 5 20:30:15 2001
From: allbery at ece.cmu.edu (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 20:30:15 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
On Friday, July 06, 2001 10:22:15 +1000, Teo de Hesselle
wrote:
+-----
| I've also copied the old transactions.... Help... users are screaming at
| me...
+--->8
Are they in the same place relative to the RT base directory?
Does etc/config.pm have the same location listed?
Does the web server have read (and write) permissions on the transactions
directory and its contents?
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery at kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls]
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 21:07:34 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:07:34 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au> <46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au>
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 06, 2001 10:22:15 +1000, Teo de Hesselle
> wrote:
> +-----
> | I've also copied the old transactions.... Help... users are screaming at
> | me...
> +--->8
>
> Are they in the same place relative to the RT base directory?
> Does etc/config.pm have the same location listed?
Yes. I've also made a symlink, so the old full path would still work.
> Does the web server have read (and write) permissions on the transactions
> directory and its contents?
Yes. And then to be double sure, I did:
cd /usr/local/rt1/transactions
chmod -R 777 .
chown -R rt:rt .
Oddly, some of them appear to be working now... in some cases one out of 5
transactions are appearing, whilst the others (in the same ticket!) are
not.
There doesn't seem to be a correlation between tickets before the move and
tickets after the move, which makes it all the more frustrating.
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From allbery at ece.cmu.edu Thu Jul 5 21:11:33 2001
From: allbery at ece.cmu.edu (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:11:33 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au>
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
<46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu> <3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <56770000.994381891@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
On Friday, July 06, 2001 11:07:34 +1000, Teo de Hesselle
wrote:
+-----
| Oddly, some of them appear to be working now... in some cases one out of 5
| transactions are appearing, whilst the others (in the same ticket!) are
| not.
|
| There doesn't seem to be a correlation between tickets before the move and
| tickets after the move, which makes it all the more frustrating.
+--->8
That sounds like whatever you did to transfer the database generated new
autoincrement sequence numbers --- which would pretty well break things
because the ones in each_req and transactions are what tie everything
together.
I'd re-dump the old RT installation with mysqldump and reload it.
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery at kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls]
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 21:24:22 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:24:22 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
<46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu> <3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au> <56770000.994381891@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <3B451346.E7082827@uts.edu.au>
"Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 06, 2001 11:07:34 +1000, Teo de Hesselle
> wrote:
> +-----
> | Oddly, some of them appear to be working now... in some cases one out of 5
> | transactions are appearing, whilst the others (in the same ticket!) are
> | not.
> |
> | There doesn't seem to be a correlation between tickets before the move and
> | tickets after the move, which makes it all the more frustrating.
> +--->8
>
You might think so, but new requests are being generated with the expected
serial numbers, and the new files are being created in the proper place
within the transaction heirachy... it's just that they (the message
bodies) aren't showing up on the webpage.
Does RT Log anywhere apart from the apache erorr log (which has nothing
interesting in it)?
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From allbery at ece.cmu.edu Thu Jul 5 21:31:57 2001
From: allbery at ece.cmu.edu (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:31:57 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B451346.E7082827@uts.edu.au>
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
<46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu> <3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au>
<56770000.994381891@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu> <3B451346.E7082827@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <63750000.994383117@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
On Friday, July 06, 2001 11:24:22 +1000, Teo de Hesselle
wrote:
+-----
| You might think so, but new requests are being generated with the expected
| serial numbers, and the new files are being created in the proper place
| within the transaction heirachy... it's just that they (the message
| bodies) aren't showing up on the webpage.
+--->8
Weird. Make sure the webserver is actually running as user rt, maybe?
| Does RT Log anywhere apart from the apache erorr log (which has nothing
| interesting in it)?
+--->8
Not by default; I installed Log::Stderr and added an invocation of it in
rtmux.pl in our copy.
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery at kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["better check the oblivious first" -ke6sls]
From chris at harvestroad.com Thu Jul 5 21:38:43 2001
From: chris at harvestroad.com (Chris Waltham)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:38:43 +0800
Subject: [rt-users] Problems upgrading 1.0.7 to 2.0.0
In-Reply-To: <20010705110955.Z23751@pallas.fsck.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010705144435.02ef32d0@spinach.harvestroad.com>
<5.1.0.14.0.20010705144435.02ef32d0@spinach.harvestroad.com>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010706093815.02ed9b78@spinach.harvestroad.com>
>RT 2.0 requires mysql 3.23. You're running mysql 3.22
Oh, whoops. Didn't realise. Thanks!
Chris, who promises to RTFM in the future
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 22:06:51 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:06:51 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <3B451D3B.EE5B48B0@uts.edu.au>
Teo de Hesselle wrote:
>
> The following relates to rt 1.0.7.
>
> I have to move RT from machine A to B... I did a fresh install and then
> overwrote the new mysql database with the original... And I've now lost
> access to the message bodies...
>
> I've also copied the old transactions.... Help... users are screaming at
> me...
>
More exciting information:
I shut the rt interface down, so I can play without affecting the users.
Now... I copied mysql/var/rt to mysql/var/rt-broke
then went into mysql and did a DROP DATABASE rt;
Next... moved /usr/local/rt1 to usr/local/rt1-broke
Changed the uid from 42 to 60001, to match the previous system it was
installed on.
"make install" from source.
The new database behaves exactly the same as the old... though I tried
creating/commenting from the web interface, and that works fine (the text
is displayed)... otherwise, the text is gone.
Now... there is no trace of the 'old' data on the system whatsoever... but
the behavior is still there.
Any ideas?
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From feargal at thecia.ie Thu Jul 5 21:35:05 2001
From: feargal at thecia.ie (Feargal Reilly)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:35:05 +0100
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B451346.E7082827@uts.edu.au>
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au>
<46160000.994379412@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
<3B450F56.1B1E3AF3@uts.edu.au>
<56770000.994381891@vpn33.ece.cmu.edu>
<3B451346.E7082827@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010706023505.4850b9e6.feargal@thecia.ie>
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:24:22 +1000 Teo de Hesselle wrote:
> You might think so, but new requests are being generated with the expected
> serial numbers, and the new files are being created in the proper place
> within the transaction heirachy... it's just that they (the message
> bodies) aren't showing up on the webpage.
Is it just imported messages which aren't displaying, or are new messages affected too? If so, before reimporting anything, recreate the new database as per a fresh install, and check that it works okay *without* any imported messages.
> Does RT Log anywhere apart from the apache erorr log (which has nothing
> interesting in it)?
Not that I know of. Logging has never been a strong suit.
--
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 22:17:54 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:17:54 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au> <3B451D3B.EE5B48B0@uts.edu.au> <20010705221311.J12900@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B451FD2.599FFAF8@uts.edu.au>
Jesse wrote:
>
> is the timezone on the two systems set the same?
>
Yes. Both are set to TZ=Australia/NSW in /etc/default/init (it's solaris).
However as I've found that I can't get a default frelling install to
happen, I longer think this is an import problem... how I failed to notice
before, I don't know...
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au Thu Jul 5 22:35:00 2001
From: teo.dehesselle at uts.edu.au (Teo de Hesselle)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:35:00 +1000
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au> <3B451D3B.EE5B48B0@uts.edu.au> <20010705221311.J12900@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <3B4523D4.92A4358D@uts.edu.au>
Jesse wrote:
>
> is the timezone on the two systems set the same?
>
Okay... you've obviously been here before... when I use the web, it
creates it using yesterday's date, and displays fine. If i move Jul/6/* to
Jul/5/*, they display fine also.
Now I just have to work out where this incorrect timezone info is coming
from...
What is the difference in the method used by the web and the mailgate?
--
T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
| about surviving until Friday
University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
From jesse at fsck.com Thu Jul 5 22:43:10 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 22:43:10 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: <3B4523D4.92A4358D@uts.edu.au>; from teo.dehesselle@uts.edu.au on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:35:00PM +1000
References: <3B4504B7.8422A2EF@uts.edu.au> <3B451D3B.EE5B48B0@uts.edu.au> <20010705221311.J12900@pallas.fsck.com> <3B4523D4.92A4358D@uts.edu.au>
Message-ID: <20010705224310.K12900@pallas.fsck.com>
They're different users and may have different default environments.
This is one of the larger design screwups in RT 1.0.x
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:35:00PM +1000, Teo de Hesselle wrote:
> Jesse wrote:
> >
> > is the timezone on the two systems set the same?
> >
>
> Okay... you've obviously been here before... when I use the web, it
> creates it using yesterday's date, and displays fine. If i move Jul/6/* to
> Jul/5/*, they display fine also.
>
> Now I just have to work out where this incorrect timezone info is coming
> from...
>
> What is the difference in the method used by the web and the mailgate?
>
> --
> T?o de Hesselle, | Diplomacy is about surviving until
> Unix Systems Administrator | the next century. Politics is
> | about surviving until Friday
> University of Technology, Sydney | afternoon. -- Yes, Minister
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
that's security the same way that asking for directions to topeka and
being told that a seal is a mammal is informative
-robin at apocalypse.org
From darren.nickerson at catchword.com Thu Jul 5 23:44:51 2001
From: darren.nickerson at catchword.com (Darren Nickerson)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:44:51 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Oddities with DBIx::SearchBuilder dep check
Message-ID: <20010706034456.6A43860085@hewes.dazza.org>
I seemed to have everything I needed:
[root at hewes rt-2-0-0]# make testdeps
/usr/bin/perl ./tools/testdeps -warn mysql
Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
Checking for HTML::Entities...found
Checking for MLDBM...found
Checking for Net::Domain...found
Checking for Net::SMTP...found
Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
Checking for Date::Parse...found
Checking for Date::Format...found
Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
Checking for Text::Template...found
Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
Checking for Errno...found
Checking for File::Temp...found
Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
And yet:
[snip]
chmod 000 /usr/local/rt2/etc/config.pm.old
make: [config-replace] Error 1 (ignored)
cp -rp ./etc/config.pm /usr/local/rt2/etc/config.pm
/usr/bin/perl -p -i -e "\
s'!!DB_TYPE!!'mysql'g;\
s'!!DB_HOST!!'localhost'g;\
s'!!DB_RT_PASS!!'balliol'g;\
s'!!DB_RT_USER!!'rt2'g;\
s'!!DB_DATABASE!!'rt2'g;\
s'!!MASON_HTML_PATH!!'/usr/local/rt2/WebRT/html'g;\
s'!!MASON_LOCAL_HTML_PATH!!'/usr/local/rt2/local/WebRT/html'g;\
s'!!MASON_SESSION_PATH!!'/usr/local/rt2/WebRT/sessiondata'g;\
s'!!MASON_DATA_PATH!!'/usr/local/rt2/WebRT/data'g;\
s'!!RT_LOG_PATH!!'/tmp'g;\
s'!!RT_VERSION!!'2.0.0'g;\
" /usr/local/rt2/etc/config.pm
[ -d /usr/local/rt2/lib ] || mkdir /usr/local/rt2/lib
chown -R root /usr/local/rt2/lib
chgrp -R bin /usr/local/rt2/lib
chmod -R 0755 /usr/local/rt2/lib
( cd ./lib; \
/usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLSITELIB=/usr/local/rt2/lib \
INSTALLSITEMAN1DIR=/usr/local/rt2/man/man1 \
INSTALLSITEMAN3DIR=/usr/local/rt2/man/man3 \
&& make \
&& make test \
&& /usr/bin/perl -p -i -e " s'!!RT_VERSION!!'2.0.0'g;" blib/lib/RT.pm ;\
make install \
)
Warning: prerequisite DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 not found at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 349.
*YIKES**
and then later:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/hdb1/darren/rt-2-0-0/lib'
make[1]: Entering directory `/hdb1/darren/rt-2-0-0/lib'
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 test.pl
1..1
Can't locate DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/arch blib/lib /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at blib/lib/RT/Record.pm line 19.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT/Record.pm line 19.
Compilation failed in require at blib/lib/RT/CurrentUser.pm line 23.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT/CurrentUser.pm line 23.
Compilation failed in require at blib/lib/RT.pm line 3.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at blib/lib/RT.pm line 3.
Compilation failed in require at test.pl line 11.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at test.pl line 11.
make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/hdb1/darren/rt-2-0-0/lib'
make[1]: Entering directory `/hdb1/darren/rt-2-0-0/lib'
Installing /usr/local/rt2/lib/RT.pm
Installing /usr/local/rt2/lib/RT/KeywordSelects.pm
Installing /usr/local/rt2/lib/RT/Links.pm
Installing /usr/local/rt2/lib/RT/Watchers.pm
Installing /usr/local/rt2/lib/RT/Group.pm
*UGH*
What I find odd is that:
cpan> install DBIx::SearchBuilder
DBIx::SearchBuilder is up to date.
Which is clearly a lie, because looking at what's available:
cpan> i /SearchBuilder/
Distribution J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.13.tar.gz
Distribution J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.15.tar.gz
Distribution J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz)
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.13.tar.gz)
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::Oracle (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz)
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::Pg (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz)
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::mysql (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz)
Module DBIx::SearchBuilder::Record (J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.15.tar.gz)
9 items found
I was able to
cpan> install J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
and it did:
cpan> install J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
Running make for J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
CPAN: LWP::UserAgent loaded ok
Fetching with LWP:
ftp://ftp.uky.edu/CPAN/authors/id/J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
Scanning cache /root/.cpan/build for sizes
Deleting from cache: /root/.cpan/build/Time-HiRes-01.20 (11.5>10.0 MB)
Deleting from cache: /root/.cpan/build/MLDBM-2.00 (11.4>10.0 MB)
Deleting from cache: /root/.cpan/build/DBIx-DBSchema-0.13 (11.2>10.0 MB)
Deleting from cache: /root/.cpan/build/HTML-Mason-0.89 (11.0>10.0 MB)
CPAN: MD5 loaded ok
Fetching with LWP:
ftp://ftp.uky.edu/CPAN/authors/id/J/JE/JESSE/CHECKSUMS
CPAN: Compress::Zlib loaded ok
Checksum for /root/.cpan/sources/authors/id/J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz ok
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/Changes
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/MANIFEST
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/MANIFEST.SKIP
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/Makefile.PL
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/test.pl
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Record.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Handle/
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Handle/Oracle.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Handle/Pg.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Handle/mysql.pm
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Record/
DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39/SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm
CPAN.pm: Going to build J/JE/JESSE/DBIx-SearchBuilder-0.39.tar.gz
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Writing Makefile for DBIx::SearchBuilder
mkdir blib
mkdir blib/lib
mkdir blib/lib/DBIx
mkdir blib/arch
mkdir blib/arch/auto
mkdir blib/arch/auto/DBIx
mkdir blib/arch/auto/DBIx/SearchBuilder
mkdir blib/lib/auto
mkdir blib/lib/auto/DBIx
mkdir blib/lib/auto/DBIx/SearchBuilder
mkdir blib/man3
cp SearchBuilder/Handle/Pg.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/Pg.pm
cp SearchBuilder/Handle.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm
cp SearchBuilder/Handle/mysql.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/mysql.pm
cp SearchBuilder.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm
cp SearchBuilder/Record.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record.pm
cp SearchBuilder/Handle/Oracle.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/Oracle.pm
cp SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm blib/lib/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm
Manifying blib/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle.3pm
Manifying blib/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::mysql.3pm
Manifying blib/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder.3pm
Manifying blib/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Record.3pm
Manifying blib/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::Oracle.3pm
/usr/bin/make -- OK
Running make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0 test.pl
1..6
ok 1
ok 2
ok 3
ok 4
ok 5
ok 6
/usr/bin/make test -- OK
Running make install
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Record/Cachable.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/Pg.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/mysql.pm
Installing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder/Handle/Oracle.pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle.3pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::mysql.3pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder.3pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Record.3pm
Installing /usr/share/man/man3/DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::Oracle.3pm
Writing /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i386-linux/auto/DBIx/SearchBuilder/.packlist
Appending installation info to /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/perllocal.pod
/usr/bin/make install -- OK
This time through the make install was happy (well aside from my having had to
mess with MySQL grants by hand . . . )
I'm posting this in case it's not just something weird with my CPAN/perl
setup.
-d
From ml at bendler-net.de Wed Jul 4 06:20:31 2001
From: ml at bendler-net.de (Thomas Bendler)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:20:31 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Keywords / Forwarding / Control / LDAP
In-Reply-To: <000c01c102ff$5e0cd5a0$69285492@tivoli.com>; from Christian Gilmore on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 09:00:35AM -0500
References: <3B400557.D42CEC36@uts.edu.au> <000c01c102ff$5e0cd5a0$69285492@tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <20010704122031.B6269@ds9.intranet.cimt-ag.de>
Hi Christian,
On Mon, 02 Jul 2001, Christian Gilmore sent incredible lines:
[...]
> I've already implemented LDAP with RT2. I'm still considering the
> synchronization issues between incoming requests and what the requestor's
> LDAP userid (or any attribute, really) would be. I would bet that within
> two week's I'll submit a patch that cleanly handles insertion of
> site-specific code for this problem with at least the one example I end up
> using personally.
> Try using Apache::AuthenLDAP and Apache::AuthzLDAP. I've written both of
> these modules and have had great success with them within IBM. Also, you
> might want to wrap Apache::AuthenCache and Apache::AuthzCache around them
> for improved performance.
Do you have a quick guide how you perform this? I think LDAP is a
quite nice and important thing that could happend to RT.
... may the Tux be with you! =Thomas=
--
Thomas Bendler \\:// ml at bendler-net.de
Billwiese 22 (o -) http://www.bendler-net.de/
21033 Hamburg ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- tel.: 0 177 - 277 37 61
Germany Linux, enjoy the ride ...!
From lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com Fri Jul 6 03:13:25 2001
From: lao_nightwolf at hotmail.com (lao nightwolf)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:13:25 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
Message-ID:
Hello,
I now see in my error_log of apache following output:
[Fri Jul 6 02:55:47 2001] [error] Connect Failed Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock' (111)
at /etc/httpd/htdocs/rt2/lib/RT.pm line 14
I'm using RH 7.0 with mysql 3.34
This is my apache start string:
[Fri Jul 6 03:12:22 2001] [notice] Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) PHP/4.0.5 mod_perl/1.25_01-dev mod_ssl/2.8.4 OpenSSL/0.9.5a configured -- resuming normal operations
I hope you can help me further because I'm blocked..
Thanks!
lao
----- Original Message -----
From: Vivek Khera
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:42 PM
To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT-2.0.0: webui problem
>>>>> "ln" == lao nightwolf writes:
ln> this is what my log says.. I don't get any further with it, though with my knowledge..
ln> thanks for helping me!
ln> [Thu Jul 5 10:01:08 2001] [error] Undefined subroutine &HTML::Mason::handler called.
You need to ensure that HTML::Mason is loaded into your server.
Either you must do a "PerlModule HTML::Mason" or require it via some
other module that gets loaded by mod_perl.
When you start your server, does it display any error messages or
write any error messages to the logs?
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From rt-list at trevorsky.com Fri Jul 6 04:37:38 2001
From: rt-list at trevorsky.com (Trevor Sky Garside)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:37:38 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
References: <007f01c105a7$8639b250$0100a8c0@halcyon> <20010705225323.L12900@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <00b601c105f6$ea54bc40$0100a8c0@halcyon>
I've scoured and can't find anything that applies... :(
It's interesting -- I've got a different issue occurring now... it appears
that Mason isn't working at all. When I try to load a page I've set to be
handled by RT::Mason, my web browser reports an invalid response from
server. If I telnet to the server on port 80, and issue the proper GET
line, I get nothing in return - just a disconnection from host.
Does anybody know anything at all about Mason, and any ways I might be able
to test it??
Aaaaargh!!
Trevor Sky Garside
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse"
To: "Trevor Sky Garside"
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
> you might want to look through the recent archives of the list. They
> speak to a lot of these issues you've had.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:09:20PM -0700, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> > I have hacked my way through getting RT2 to install on my system, but I
> > can't get the Apache config to work properly. Apache appears to be
ignoring
> > the Perl handler. Here is my VirtualHost line from httpd.conf:
> >
> >
> > DocumentRoot /opt/rt2/WebRT/html
> > ServerName rt.mydomainname
> > PerlModule Apache::DBI
> > PerlRequire /opt/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
> > ErrorLog /opt/rt2/logs/apache-error.log
> >
> >
> > SetHandler perl-script
> > PerlHandler RT::Mason
> >
> >
> >
> > (I have removed my domain name and IP because I don't want random people
> > poking around an unfinished installation... ;)
> >
> > I have confirmed that Apache is basically ignoring the SetHandler line
> > because it does the same thing no matter what is listed there -- at the
> > moment, it is set to SetHandler your-mom - no error flagged when apache
> > starts up, and it merely spits out the plain HTML instead of processing
it
> > through Mason.
> >
> >
> > As a side note, I had *severe* trouble getting this program to install
at
> > all. Does anybody have any installation notes from their RT2 install?
I'd
> > like to see if others had the same troubles I did.
> >
> > Installed on a RedHat 7.1 system, MySQL was installed using the RPMs.
> > Running make fixdeps actually downloaded and built a new Perl, which has
> > been an unrelated source of many headaches.
> >
> > Thanks for any help anybody can provide.
> >
> > Trevor Sky Garside
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> . . when not in doubt, get in doubt. -- Old Discordian Proveb
>
From bruno.mattarollo at ams.greenpeace.org Fri Jul 6 04:47:45 2001
From: bruno.mattarollo at ams.greenpeace.org (Bruno Mattarollo)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:47:45 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
In-Reply-To: <00b601c105f6$ea54bc40$0100a8c0@halcyon>; from rt-list@trevorsky.com on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:37:38 -0700
References: <007f01c105a7$8639b250$0100a8c0@halcyon> <20010705225323.L12900@pallas.fsck.com> <00b601c105f6$ea54bc40$0100a8c0@halcyon>
Message-ID: <20010706104745.H22634@mail.nli.gl3>
Hello
I am VERY new to rt2 (I have just installed it) but it's working for me.
The installation was really straight forward. I installed it with Pg 7.1.2
No problems with Apache at all! (RedHat 7.1)
Can you look at the access logs from Apache? Can you report what you see
there? Is there anything on the error_log?
Just my 2 cts.
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> I've scoured and can't find anything that applies... :(
>
> It's interesting -- I've got a different issue occurring now... it appears
> that Mason isn't working at all. When I try to load a page I've set to be
> handled by RT::Mason, my web browser reports an invalid response from
> server. If I telnet to the server on port 80, and issue the proper GET
> line, I get nothing in return - just a disconnection from host.
>
> Does anybody know anything at all about Mason, and any ways I might be able
> to test it??
Bruno Mattarollo
Systems Administrator
Greenpeace [ http://www.greenpeace.org/ ]
---
Never give up on a dream because of the time it will take to accomplish it.
The time will pass anyway.
Get cyberactivated:
http://act.greenpeace.org/
From rherget at xebec.de Fri Jul 6 04:52:44 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:52:44 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
In-Reply-To: <00b601c105f6$ea54bc40$0100a8c0@halcyon>
Message-ID:
Hi Trevor,
I've seen things like this with mod_perl+php4 where php4 is compiled
against other mysql headers than DBI::mysql. Look in your main apache
error log: any lines like this ?
[Fri Mar 30 14:34:40 2001] [notice] child pid 742 exit signal Segmentation
fault (11)
ok, but there are a lot of other possibilities, too !
As possible solution remove as much modules as possible from your apache
config (php3, php4, ...)
Greetings,
Roland
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> I've scoured and can't find anything that applies... :(
>
> It's interesting -- I've got a different issue occurring now... it appears
> that Mason isn't working at all. When I try to load a page I've set to be
> handled by RT::Mason, my web browser reports an invalid response from
> server. If I telnet to the server on port 80, and issue the proper GET
> line, I get nothing in return - just a disconnection from host.
>
> Does anybody know anything at all about Mason, and any ways I might be able
> to test it??
>
> Aaaaargh!!
>
> Trevor Sky Garside
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jesse"
> To: "Trevor Sky Garside"
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT2 installation problems (apache configuration)
>
>
> > you might want to look through the recent archives of the list. They
> > speak to a lot of these issues you've had.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:09:20PM -0700, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> > > I have hacked my way through getting RT2 to install on my system, but I
> > > can't get the Apache config to work properly. Apache appears to be
> ignoring
> > > the Perl handler. Here is my VirtualHost line from httpd.conf:
> > >
> > >
> > > DocumentRoot /opt/rt2/WebRT/html
> > > ServerName rt.mydomainname
> > > PerlModule Apache::DBI
> > > PerlRequire /opt/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
> > > ErrorLog /opt/rt2/logs/apache-error.log
> > >
> > >
> > > SetHandler perl-script
> > > PerlHandler RT::Mason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (I have removed my domain name and IP because I don't want random people
> > > poking around an unfinished installation... ;)
> > >
> > > I have confirmed that Apache is basically ignoring the SetHandler line
> > > because it does the same thing no matter what is listed there -- at the
> > > moment, it is set to SetHandler your-mom - no error flagged when apache
> > > starts up, and it merely spits out the plain HTML instead of processing
> it
> > > through Mason.
> > >
> > >
> > > As a side note, I had *severe* trouble getting this program to install
> at
> > > all. Does anybody have any installation notes from their RT2 install?
> I'd
> > > like to see if others had the same troubles I did.
> > >
> > > Installed on a RedHat 7.1 system, MySQL was installed using the RPMs.
> > > Running make fixdeps actually downloaded and built a new Perl, which has
> > > been an unrelated source of many headaches.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any help anybody can provide.
> > >
> > > Trevor Sky Garside
> > >
> > >
From tlongo at avaya.com Fri Jul 6 08:37:49 2001
From: tlongo at avaya.com (Tim Longo)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:37:49 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] webrt timeout
Message-ID:
Hello rt-users,
I am having a problem where a webrt session seems to time out without me
clicking the "logout" link. I will log into webrt, and view my queue, even
reply, comment resolve tickets etc. If I later decide to reply to a ticket,
or even update my queue display, I find that sometimes, I have to login to
webrt again? This is a big problem when I reply to a ticket since I don't
know the session has timed out until I hit send. Then the reply I typed in
is lost.
Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks!
Tim
From p.caci at seabone.net Fri Jul 6 09:48:39 2001
From: p.caci at seabone.net (Pierfrancesco Caci)
Date: 06 Jul 2001 15:48:39 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] how to add the original message?
Message-ID: <87elrugoco.fsf@paperino.int-seabone.net>
In RT v.1.0.6 (yes, yes, I know 2.0 is out)
how can I add the text of the original message to a comment or a
reply? Which tag should I use ?
Thanks
Pf
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierfrancesco Caci | System Administrator @ seabone.net
p.caci at seabone.net | Telecom Italia S.p.A. - International Operations
Linux paperino 2.4.5 #1 Tue Jun 12 11:33:43 CEST 2001 i686 unknown
From hwagener at fcb-wilkens.com Fri Jul 6 11:31:59 2001
From: hwagener at fcb-wilkens.com (Harald Wagener)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 17:31:59 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Still problems with /SelfService/
Message-ID: <3B45D9EF.AB84D98C@fcb-wilkens.com>
OK, now I know users get autocreated when they send a request to the
mailgate. Also, I know their uid is equal to their email-address (which we
will change to their email adress up to but not including the @, since the
rt mail gateway is not reachable by people outside our company network, thus
all 'email names' are unique).
I also found that the autocreated users' password is set to *NO_PASSWD* in
the database, and since this is a crypted value, guessing the password is
really hard.
Which password do autocreated users use to login at /SelfService/ ? I tried
the obvious two (namely, 'password' and the uid created), but those don't
work. Leaving the password field empty didn't work, either.
Regards,
Harald
--
Harald Wagener | Systemadministrator
FCB/Wilkens GmbH | Tel.:+49-40-2881-1252
An der Alster 42 | Fax.:+49-40-2881-1263
20099 Hamburg | http://www.fcb-wilkens.com
From jesse at fsck.com Fri Jul 6 11:58:18 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:58:18 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Still problems with /SelfService/
In-Reply-To: <3B45D9EF.AB84D98C@fcb-wilkens.com>; from hwagener@fcb-wilkens.com on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:31:59PM +0200
References: <3B45D9EF.AB84D98C@fcb-wilkens.com>
Message-ID: <20010706115818.U12900@pallas.fsck.com>
As of now, RT2 doesn't automatically assign passwords to users on account
creation. Down the line, the plan is to assign random passwords and optionally
email them to the user. For now, you need to manually set them.
-j
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:31:59PM +0200, Harald Wagener wrote:
>
> OK, now I know users get autocreated when they send a request to the
> mailgate. Also, I know their uid is equal to their email-address (which we
> will change to their email adress up to but not including the @, since the
> rt mail gateway is not reachable by people outside our company network, thus
> all 'email names' are unique).
>
> I also found that the autocreated users' password is set to *NO_PASSWD* in
> the database, and since this is a crypted value, guessing the password is
> really hard.
>
> Which password do autocreated users use to login at /SelfService/ ? I tried
> the obvious two (namely, 'password' and the uid created), but those don't
> work. Leaving the password field empty didn't work, either.
>
> Regards,
> Harald
>
> --
> Harald Wagener | Systemadministrator
> FCB/Wilkens GmbH | Tel.:+49-40-2881-1252
> An der Alster 42 | Fax.:+49-40-2881-1263
> 20099 Hamburg | http://www.fcb-wilkens.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
"That package looks like what I wanted, but the site was down today,
so I decided to reimplement it in Perl."
-me
From ludek at mokry.cz Fri Jul 6 06:08:02 2001
From: ludek at mokry.cz (Ludek Mokry)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:08:02 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] changing resolve (stalled) status to open
Message-ID:
Hello,
Is it possible to change automatically resolved message status if requestor
replied to that resolved message?
Thanks.
Ludek.
From jesse at fsck.com Fri Jul 6 13:04:37 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:04:37 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] changing resolve (stalled) status to open
In-Reply-To: ; from ludek@mokry.cz on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:08:02PM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20010706130437.B12900@pallas.fsck.com>
RT 1.0.x does that. RT 2.0.0 doesn't unless the user has ACLS to modify the ticket. This will be fixed in 2.0.1
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:08:02PM +0200, Ludek Mokry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to change automatically resolved message status if requestor
> replied to that resolved message?
>
> Thanks.
> Ludek.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
They'll take my private key when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!
From rjohnson at tripwire.com Fri Jul 6 14:21:10 2001
From: rjohnson at tripwire.com (Russ Johnson)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:21:10 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] "Various and sundry perl modules" and "setgid perl"
Message-ID: <1C64CE7BD3DD8C4EB8F6D4A8F2F526C92161@postalfish.tripwire.com>
I'm attempting to install RT2.0 on RH 7.0.
In the "Required Packages" section of the readme, it lists "Various and
sundry perl modules".
What does this mean?
Also, is there an easy way to verify that my perl supports setgid?
Thanks in advance!
Russ Johnson
Testlab Manager
Tripwire, Inc.
From khera at kcilink.com Fri Jul 6 14:49:32 2001
From: khera at kcilink.com (Vivek Khera)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:49:32 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] "Various and sundry perl modules" and "setgid perl"
In-Reply-To: <1C64CE7BD3DD8C4EB8F6D4A8F2F526C92161@postalfish.tripwire.com>
References: <1C64CE7BD3DD8C4EB8F6D4A8F2F526C92161@postalfish.tripwire.com>
Message-ID: <15174.2108.185706.566588@onceler.kciLink.com>
>>>>> "RJ" == Russ Johnson writes:
RJ> I'm attempting to install RT2.0 on RH 7.0.
RJ> In the "Required Packages" section of the readme, it lists "Various and
RJ> sundry perl modules".
RJ> What does this mean?
Lots of stuff ;-) There's a script in the source tree that checks for
nearly all the necessary modules. Just run it.
RJ> Also, is there an easy way to verify that my perl supports setgid?
ls -l `which suidperl`
Does it have the suid bit set? My perms look like this:
-rws--x--x 3 root wheel 50920 Jun 26 09:03 /usr/bin/suidperl*
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera at kciLink.com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From greg at ussnomad.org Sat Jul 7 14:13:09 2001
From: greg at ussnomad.org (Greg Trotter)
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 13:13:09 -0500
Subject: [rt-users] Function CGI::Object::unescape does not exist
In-Reply-To: <20010701042002.8A8BA1122F@pallas.eruditorum.org>
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20010707131031.028c9ec0@forbin.ussnomad.org>
On June 29th, Jesse wrote:
>hrm. What happens if you run
>perl -MCPAN -e'install CGI'
>
> -j
>
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:57:03PM -0400, Derek Buttineau wrote:
> > I'm having an issue at the tail end of the RT2 installation, everything
> installed fine, however when I try to bring up the Admin web interface or
> login using an account I created at command line, I end up with a 500
> server error..
> >
> > The Apache logs show the following:
> >
> > [Fri Jun 29 19:25:31 2001] [error] Function CGI::Object::unescape does
> not exist at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 112
> > [Fri Jun 29 19:41:58 2001] [error] Can't call method "unescape" on an
> undefined value at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 112.
> > [Fri Jun 29 19:42:05 2001] [error] Can't call method "unescape" on an
> undefined value at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 112.
> > [Fri Jun 29 19:42:06 2001] [error] Function CGI::Object::unescape does
> not exist at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 112
> > [Fri Jun 29 19:42:13 2001] [error] Function CGI::Object::unescape does
> not exist at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 112
> >
> > RT log in /tmp shows the following as well:
> >
> > Attempt to free unreferenced scalar.
I didn't see any replies to this... was there a resolution? I am having the
identical problem.
- greg
--
Greg Trotter
greg at ussnomad.org
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Sun Jul 8 07:09:22 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 13:09:22 +0200
Subject: AW: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
Message-ID:
Hi,
After re-installint RT to a complete different box as the original one
appeared to be a nightmare,
I get the following error when starting apache:
Syntax error on line 980 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
fixdeps and testdeps went fine, the following perl modules are installed
properly however:
DBIx::SearchBuilder
0.39
DBIx::DataSource
0.02
DBI 1.18
Digest::MD5 2.13
RT !!RT_VERSION!!
Apache::Session
1.53
mod_perl 1.25
Msql-Mysql-modules
1.2216
Data::ShowTable 3.3
Log::Dispatch 1.79
Text::Template 1.31
Text::Wrapper 1.000
Tie::IxHash 1.21
MIME-tools 5.411
IO-stringy 1.220
MIME::Base64 2.12
Mail 1.15
TimeDate 1.10
MD5 2.02
Storable 1.012
HTML::Mason 1.03
Params::Validate
0.04
Net 1.07
MLDBM 2.00
HTML::Parser 3.25
HTML::Tagset 3.03
Any ideas ?
Lars
-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From jesse at fsck.com Sun Jul 8 12:15:54 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:15:54 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
In-Reply-To: ; from lleuchter@germany.ea.com on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 01:09:22PM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20010708121554.G1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Read the readme. It tells you that you'll probably have to install Apache::DBI
by hand.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 01:09:22PM +0200, Leuchter, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After re-installint RT to a complete different box as the original one
> appeared to be a nightmare,
> I get the following error when starting apache:
>
> Syntax error on line 980 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
> Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
>
>
>
> fixdeps and testdeps went fine, the following perl modules are installed
> properly however:
>
>
>
> DBIx::SearchBuilder
> 0.39
> DBIx::DataSource
> 0.02
> DBI 1.18
> Digest::MD5 2.13
> RT !!RT_VERSION!!
> Apache::Session
> 1.53
> mod_perl 1.25
> Msql-Mysql-modules
> 1.2216
> Data::ShowTable 3.3
>
> Log::Dispatch 1.79
> Text::Template 1.31
> Text::Wrapper 1.000
> Tie::IxHash 1.21
> MIME-tools 5.411
> IO-stringy 1.220
> MIME::Base64 2.12
> Mail 1.15
> TimeDate 1.10
> MD5 2.02
> Storable 1.012
> HTML::Mason 1.03
> Params::Validate
> 0.04
> Net 1.07
> MLDBM 2.00
> HTML::Parser 3.25
> HTML::Tagset 3.03
>
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Lars
>
>
> -
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
"Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock
phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"
From jesse at fsck.com Sun Jul 8 16:14:15 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 16:14:15 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] [fwd] RE: [fsck.com #657] Re: Need help...solved... (from: rudy@ccom.net)
Message-ID: <20010708161415.H1998@pallas.fsck.com>
As a heads up to people who couldn't get mason to properly activate the
web interface...
----- Forwarded message from Rudy Setiawan -----
Reply-To:
From: "Rudy Setiawan"
To:
Subject: RE: [fsck.com #657] Re: Need help...solved...
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:35:37 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
Jesse,
Hehe doh, I just checked the configuration.
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .html
Heheh so that's why apache did not recognise the code in the .html file
<& &> as a mason code.
So I deleted .html form that line. And it works :)
Thanks jesse for your help and time.
Rudy
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody [mailto:rt-2.0-gateway at pallas.eruditorum.org] On Behalf Of
Jesse Vincent via RT
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 12:01 AM
To: rudy at ccom.net
Subject: Re: [fsck.com #657] Re: Need help...
what's in your apache error logs?
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 05:38:55PM -0400, rudy @ ccom . net via RT
wrote:
>
>
>
> Sat Jul 7 17:38:53 2001: Request 657 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Mail sent by rudy at ccom.net
> Queue: RT Bugs
> Subject: RE: [fsck.com #657] Re: Need help...
> Owner: jesse
> Requestors: rudy at ccom.net
> Status: new
> Ticket
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Jesse,
>
> I have built mod_perl and HTML::MASON.
> What do I need to put in the apache configuration ?
>
> In my current apache httpd.conf:
>
>
> DocumentRoot /home/rt2/WebRT/html
> ServerName my.ccom.net
> PerlModule Apache::DBI
> PerlRequire /home/rt2/bin/webmux.pl
> ErrorLog logs/my.ccom.net-error_log
> TransferLog logs/my.ccom.net-access-log
> AddType text/html .shtml
> AddHandler server-parsed .shtml
> AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
>
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlHandler RT::Mason
>
>
>
>
> [root at admin rt-2-0-0]# make testdeps
> /usr/bin/perl ./tools/testdeps -warn mysql
> Checking for DBI 1.16 ...found
> Checking for DBIx::DataSource 0.02 ...found
> Checking for DBIx::SearchBuilder 0.39 ...found
> Checking for HTML::Entities...found
> Checking for MLDBM...found
> Checking for Net::Domain...found
> Checking for Net::SMTP...found
> Checking for Params::Validate 0.02 ...found
> Checking for HTML::Mason 0.896 ...found
> Checking for CGI::Cookie 1.06 ...found
> Checking for Apache::Session 1.53 ...found
> Checking for Date::Parse...found
> Checking for Date::Format...found
> Checking for MIME::Entity 5.108 ...found
> Checking for Mail::Mailer 1.20 ...found
> Checking for Getopt::Long 2.24 ...found
> Checking for Tie::IxHash...found
> Checking for Text::Wrapper...found
> Checking for Text::Template...found
> Checking for File::Spec 0.8 ...found
> Checking for Errno...found
> Checking for File::Temp...found
> Checking for Log::Dispatch 1.6 ...found
> Checking for DBD::mysql 2.0416 ...found
>
> Thanks a lot Jesse.
>
> Rudy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody [mailto:nobody at pallas.eruditorum.org] On Behalf Of Jesse
> Vincent via RT
> Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:07 PM
> To: rudy at ccom.net
> Subject: [fsck.com #657] Re: Need help...
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text message not quoted]
>
>
>
> You haven't properly configured apache to use HTML::Mason or
>
> mod_perl for your RT instance.
>
> --
>
> Jesse R Vincent - jesse at fsck.com - http://fsck.com/projects/rt
>
>
>
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Pelcgb-serrqbz abj!
----- End forwarded message -----
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
I have images of Marc in well worn combat fatigues, covered in mud,
sweat and blood, knife in one hand and PSION int he other, being
restrained by several other people, screaming "Let me at it!
Just let me at it!" Eichin standing calmly by with something
automated, milspec, and likely recoilless.
-xiphmont on opensource peer review
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Mon Jul 9 08:46:45 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:46:45 +0200
Subject: AW: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
Message-ID:
OK guys,
got this fixed, now I?ve got a different error (output from my apache
error_log)
[Mon Jul 9 08:43:33 2001] [error] [client 10.20.19.1] Invalid method in
request
user=root&pass=passwordGET /rt.jpg HTTP/1.1
I can?t log in at all ....
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Lars
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jesse [mailto:jesse at fsck.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 8. Juli 2001 18:16
An: Leuchter, Lars
Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Betreff: Re: [rt-users] Help... moved RT and now lost message bodies!
Read the readme. It tells you that you'll probably have to install
Apache::DBI by hand.
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 01:09:22PM +0200, Leuchter, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After re-installint RT to a complete different box as the original one
> appeared to be a nightmare, I get the following error when starting
> apache:
>
> Syntax error on line 980 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
> Can't locate Apache/DBI.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
>
>
>
> fixdeps and testdeps went fine, the following perl modules are
> installed properly however:
>
>
>
> DBIx::SearchBuilder
> 0.39
> DBIx::DataSource
> 0.02
> DBI 1.18
> Digest::MD5 2.13
> RT !!RT_VERSION!!
> Apache::Session
> 1.53
> mod_perl 1.25
> Msql-Mysql-modules
> 1.2216
> Data::ShowTable 3.3
>
> Log::Dispatch
1.79
> Text::Template
1.31
> Text::Wrapper
1.000
> Tie::IxHash 1.21
> MIME-tools 5.411
> IO-stringy 1.220
> MIME::Base64 2.12
> Mail 1.15
> TimeDate 1.10
> MD5 2.02
> Storable 1.012
> HTML::Mason 1.03
> Params::Validate
> 0.04
> Net 1.07
> MLDBM 2.00
> HTML::Parser 3.25
> HTML::Tagset 3.03
>
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Lars
>
>
> -
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
"Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock
phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"
From derek at csolve.net Mon Jul 9 15:13:08 2001
From: derek at csolve.net (Derek Buttineau)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:13:08 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Exim problems with RT2?
Message-ID: <015801c108ab$3048ed00$159ad0d8@csolve.net>
Good Day,
Just recently I had everything working fine with RT 2 but decided to pursue
switching the system over to Exim to allow for mySQL user administration for
the rest of the server..
However Exim seems to have a problem with the rt wrapper...
Has anyone else experienced this?
Regards,
Derek Buttineau
Internet Systems Administrator
Compu-SOLVE Internet Services
From rt-list at trevorsky.com Mon Jul 9 19:28:04 2001
From: rt-list at trevorsky.com (Trevor Sky Garside)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:28:04 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Exim problems with RT2?
References: <015801c108ab$3048ed00$159ad0d8@csolve.net>
Message-ID: <003101c108ce$cf69b0e0$0100a8c0@halcyon>
> Just recently I had everything working fine with RT 2 but decided to
pursue
> switching the system over to Exim to allow for mySQL user administration
for
> the rest of the server..
>
> However Exim seems to have a problem with the rt wrapper...
>
> Has anyone else experienced this?
Actually, no.
RT2 has been working solid with Exim from the moment I got it to install.
I'm presently running Exim directly out of the box, with the notable
exception that I had to give Exim a user to run as for pipe deliveries...
--- From Exim's configure file:
address_pipe:
driver = pipe
user = mail
return_output
---
I've got the users in /etc/aliases and it's working great.
My next step is going to be to turn Exim's configuration over to MySQL
(which is how our main Exim mail server works). I'll let you know if I
encounter any oddities during that phase.
What errors did Exim give in its error log?
Trevor Sky Garside
From rherget at xebec.de Tue Jul 10 08:38:53 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:38:53 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
Message-ID:
Hi all,
I've a problem:
we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
I found this in Web.pm:
line 215:
# {{{ Limit requestor email
#TODO this doesn't work
if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
);
}
# }}}
ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
Does this work in the cvs version ?
Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
Thanks a lot,
Roland
From gjjc at rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk Tue Jul 10 09:36:19 2001
From: gjjc at rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk (Greg Cope)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:36:19 +0000
Subject: [rt-users] OnOwnerChange script ?
Message-ID: <3B4B04D3.DE9DF222@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
dear All,
As a keen newbie to RT v2.0 I'm at a loss on how to do the following:
We run a few queue's, with a queue admin whom allocates tickets to
certain users to deal with, by changing the owner. At present the owner
is not emailed if they are given a new ticket (i.e the owner ship
changes). I have not been able to find a referance to an OnOwnerChange
script. This appears to me to be a logival feature.
If no such script exists is it easy to change RT to do this ? (Given
that I have good perl skills) Where do I start ?
Thanks in advance.
Greg
ps Jesse, thanks for a nift GPL'ed tool. Its much appreciated here.
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 10:31:36 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:31:36 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] OnOwnerChange script ?
In-Reply-To: <3B4B04D3.DE9DF222@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>; from gjjc@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:36:19PM +0000
References: <3B4B04D3.DE9DF222@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20010710103136.N1998@pallas.fsck.com>
*nod* There is currently no such scripcondition, though we're slowly building an
archive of contributed scripconditions and scripactions.
you might want to check out "OnQueueChange" in
ftp://ftp.fsck.com/pub/rt/contrib/2.0/rt-addons/ScripConditiona to see what
it takes to put together a scrip. it should be a fairly easy thing to do.
-j
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:36:19PM +0000, Greg Cope wrote:
> dear All,
>
> As a keen newbie to RT v2.0 I'm at a loss on how to do the following:
>
> We run a few queue's, with a queue admin whom allocates tickets to
> certain users to deal with, by changing the owner. At present the owner
> is not emailed if they are given a new ticket (i.e the owner ship
> changes). I have not been able to find a referance to an OnOwnerChange
> script. This appears to me to be a logival feature.
>
> If no such script exists is it easy to change RT to do this ? (Given
> that I have good perl skills) Where do I start ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Greg
>
> ps Jesse, thanks for a nift GPL'ed tool. Its much appreciated here.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
"Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock
phasers on the Heffalump, Piglet, meet me in transporter room three"
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 11:54:29 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:54:29 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: ; from rherget@xebec.de on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20010710115429.P1998@pallas.fsck.com>
The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
now)
-j
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a problem:
>
> we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> I found this in Web.pm:
>
> line 215:
> # {{{ Limit requestor email
> #TODO this doesn't work
>
> if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> );
>
> }
> # }}}
>
> ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
>
> Does this work in the cvs version ?
> Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Gur SOV jnagf gb znxr guvf fvt vyyrtny.
From Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de Tue Jul 10 12:05:20 2001
From: Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de (Bernhard Schmalhofer)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:05:20 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Logout after clicking 'Home'
Message-ID: <3B4B27C0.3DD64344@biomax.de>
Hi,
I have just installed RT on a new machine. The installation went very
smoothly
with a newly install mysql 3.23.39, Perl 5.6.1, apache 1.3.20 and
mod-perl 1.25.
The only thing I messed up was when I put an unescaped '@' into
$CommentAddress and $CorrespondAddress in /etc/config.pm .
To make this more safe one could put the default values into single
quotes.
<$CorrespondAddress="RT::CorrespondAddress.not.set";
>$CorrespondAddress='RT::CorrespondAddress.not.set';
I have set the timezone to 'Germany', which is propably not correct
on my Linux-machine.
On a different machine I already had a test installation of a recent
Beta-Version.
In order to import my previous requests I did a mysqldump of the old
RT-database and imported it onto the new machine.
old_machine>mysqldump --add-drop-table -u root -pxxxxxx rt > rt.dump
new_machine> cp $MYSQL_HOME/var/rt2 $MYSQL_HOME/var/rt2_backup
new_machine> cat rt.dump > mysql -u root -pxxxxx rt2
After that I could view my old requests in the web-interface.
The only problem I now have that clicking 'Home' logs every user out.
Does that sound familiar to anybody?
CU, Bernhard
PS: Is somebody interested into a DBD::RAM port of RT2 ?
It might be nice for demonstration and testing.
--
*************************************************
Bernhard Schmalhofer
Software Engineer
Biomax Informatics AG
Lochhamer Str. 11
82152 Martinsried, Germany
Tel: +49 89 89 55 74 - 39
Fax: +49 89 89 55 74 - 25
mailto:Bernhard.Schmalhofer at biomax.de
http://www.biomax.de
*************************************************
From rherget at xebec.de Tue Jul 10 12:22:57 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: <20010710115429.P1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
Hmmm,
ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
what can I do for getting this working ?
where do I have to start ?
Thanks,
Roland
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> now)
>
> -j
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've a problem:
> >
> > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > I found this in Web.pm:
> >
> > line 215:
> > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > #TODO this doesn't work
> >
> > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > );
> >
> > }
> > # }}}
> >
> > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> >
> > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> >
> > Roland
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 12:32:15 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:32:15 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: ; from rherget@xebec.de on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200
References: <20010710115429.P1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010710123215.R1998@pallas.fsck.com>
That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
What queries is RT generating against the database?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
>
> Hmmm,
>
> ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> what can I do for getting this working ?
> where do I have to start ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roland
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
>
> > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > now)
> >
> > -j
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've a problem:
> > >
> > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > >
> > > line 215:
> > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > >
> > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > );
> > >
> > > }
> > > # }}}
> > >
> > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > >
> > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot,
> > >
> > > Roland
>
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
From rherget at xebec.de Tue Jul 10 12:54:42 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: <20010710123215.R1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
Ok:
i've search for 'SG': here it is:
SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
Users_2 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress LIKE '%SG%')) AND
((Watchers_1.Scope = 'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type = 'Requestor')) AND
Watchers_1.Owner = Users_2.id AND main.id = Watchers_1.Value ORDER BY
main.id ASC
looks good, what am I doing wrong ?
Greetings,
Roland
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
> What queries is RT generating against the database?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm,
> >
> > ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> > something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> > now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> > If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> > get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> > what can I do for getting this working ?
> > where do I have to start ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> >
> > > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > > now)
> > >
> > > -j
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've a problem:
> > > >
> > > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > > >
> > > > line 215:
> > > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > > >
> > > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > > );
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > > # }}}
> > > >
> > > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > > >
> > > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > >
> > > > Roland
From rherget at xebec.de Tue Jul 10 12:58:00 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:58:00 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: <20010710123215.R1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
after writing the last email i found a few other lines:
SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
Users_2, Watchers Watchers_3, Users Users_4 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress
LIKE '%SG%')) AND ((Watchers_3.Type = 'Requestor')) AND ((Watchers_3.Scope
= 'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Scope = 'Ticket')) AND
((Users_4.EmailAddress = '%SG%')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type =
'Requestor')) AND Watchers_1.Owner = Users_2.id AND main.id =
Watchers_1.Value AND Watchers_3.Owner = Users_4.id AND main.id =
Watchers_3.Value ORDER BY main.id ASC
SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
Users_2 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress = '%SG%')) AND ((Watchers_1.Scope =
'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type = 'Requestor')) AND Watchers_1.Owner =
Users_2.id AND main.id = Watchers_1.Value ORDER BY main.id ASC
?!
Roland
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
> What queries is RT generating against the database?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm,
> >
> > ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> > something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> > now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> > If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> > get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> > what can I do for getting this working ?
> > where do I have to start ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> >
> > > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > > now)
> > >
> > > -j
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I've a problem:
> > > >
> > > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > > >
> > > > line 215:
> > > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > > >
> > > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > > );
> > > >
> > > > }
> > > > # }}}
> > > >
> > > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > > >
> > > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > >
> > > > Roland
> >
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
> cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
>
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 12:58:56 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:58:56 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: ; from rherget@xebec.de on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:54:42PM +0200
References: <20010710123215.R1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010710125856.S1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Ok. it looks like it's only searching for users who are watchers, as opposed
to strings who are watchers. hrm. I'll have to think about the right way
to fix that.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:54:42PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
>
> Ok:
>
> i've search for 'SG': here it is:
> SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
> Users_2 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress LIKE '%SG%')) AND
> ((Watchers_1.Scope = 'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type = 'Requestor')) AND
> Watchers_1.Owner = Users_2.id AND main.id = Watchers_1.Value ORDER BY
> main.id ASC
>
> looks good, what am I doing wrong ?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
>
> > That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
> > What queries is RT generating against the database?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmmm,
> > >
> > > ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> > > something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> > > now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> > > If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> > > get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> > > what can I do for getting this working ?
> > > where do I have to start ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Roland
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> > >
> > > > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > > > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > > > now)
> > > >
> > > > -j
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've a problem:
> > > > >
> > > > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > > > >
> > > > > line 215:
> > > > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > > > >
> > > > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > > > );
> > > > >
> > > > > }
> > > > > # }}}
> > > > >
> > > > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > > >
> > > > > Roland
>
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
than 10 seconds continuously."
-Nathan Mehl
From rt-list at trevorsky.com Tue Jul 10 13:05:13 2001
From: rt-list at trevorsky.com (Trevor Sky Garside)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:05:13 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 - Email notifications
Message-ID: <006701c10962$7c98acb0$0100a8c0@halcyon>
Hey -- I'm trying to get RT2 configured to mail a copy of a new tocket to
all of the listed watchers on the queue -- seems like a logical thing to do.
Problem is, only thing I can figure out how to do is to tell them a ticket
is open -- I can't figure out how to make it include a copy of the new
ticket in the email. How would I do this?
Trevor Sky Garside
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 13:13:20 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:13:20 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 - Email notifications
In-Reply-To: <006701c10962$7c98acb0$0100a8c0@halcyon>; from rt-list@trevorsky.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:05:13AM -0700
References: <006701c10962$7c98acb0$0100a8c0@halcyon>
Message-ID: <20010710131320.U1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Take a look at the Transaction template. or even the AutoReply template.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> Hey -- I'm trying to get RT2 configured to mail a copy of a new tocket to
> all of the listed watchers on the queue -- seems like a logical thing to do.
> Problem is, only thing I can figure out how to do is to tell them a ticket
> is open -- I can't figure out how to make it include a copy of the new
> ticket in the email. How would I do this?
>
> Trevor Sky Garside
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
Transporters are so ungodly. if god had wanted us to travel great distances
instantaneously, he would have given us an internal
materialisation/dematerialisation control.
-- Shoshe Cole
From trevor at trevorsky.com Tue Jul 10 13:18:41 2001
From: trevor at trevorsky.com (Trevor Sky Garside)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:18:41 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 - Email notifications
References: <006701c10962$7c98acb0$0100a8c0@halcyon> <20010710131320.U1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <007501c10964$5ddb5780$0100a8c0@halcyon>
Thanks... I hadn't realized until now that those templates could be
edited... I see now that I have to go into 'Global', and not into the queue
config section.
Trevor Sky Garside
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesse"
To: "Trevor Sky Garside"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [rt-users] RT2 - Email notifications
> Take a look at the Transaction template. or even the AutoReply template.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 10:05:13AM -0700, Trevor Sky Garside wrote:
> > Hey -- I'm trying to get RT2 configured to mail a copy of a new tocket
to
> > all of the listed watchers on the queue -- seems like a logical thing to
do.
> > Problem is, only thing I can figure out how to do is to tell them a
ticket
> > is open -- I can't figure out how to make it include a copy of the new
> > ticket in the email. How would I do this?
> >
> > Trevor Sky Garside
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> Transporters are so ungodly. if god had wanted us to travel great
distances
> instantaneously, he would have given us an internal
> materialisation/dematerialisation control.
> -- Shoshe Cole
>
From tasosc at otenet.gr Tue Jul 10 13:34:39 2001
From: tasosc at otenet.gr (Tasos Chronis)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:34:39 +0300
Subject: [rt-users] [solved] import-10-to-2.0 ticket problems
Message-ID: <3B4B3CAF.4090204@otenet.gr>
Hi all
For those having problems importing tickets from 1.0.x to 2.0.x
I got over this problem by updating certain perl packages.
In short I did:
#perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install Bundle::Mysql (you may need to add force in the beginning)
...
cpan> install Bundle::DBI (you may need to add force in the beginning)
...
Download the latest import-1.0-to-2.0 (from what I see it just adds a
check )
run it. (make sure that you have a clean rt2 database (do a make dropdb
&& make install))
Take care
Tasos
From naffleck at hightechhigh.org Tue Jul 10 15:09:08 2001
From: naffleck at hightechhigh.org (Nathan Affleck)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:09:08 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] Use of uninitalized Value in email util.
Message-ID:
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 921,
line 12.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/DBIx/SearchBuilder.pm line 111,
line 12.
I've tried several different versions of SearchBuilder as well... with
varying error messages.
..n8
From Bas at Toonk.nl Tue Jul 10 16:48:57 2001
From: Bas at Toonk.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:48:57 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Priority ?
Message-ID: <002501c10981$bdc1a420$0e00a8c0@bloodhound.dhs.org>
Hi,
How does Priority works ?
What is it exactly ?
has it something to do with Due ?
I have a created a queue with a due in 5 days.
But wat can i do with priority ?
PS: Great application!!!
-Bas Toonk
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Tue Jul 10 17:15:09 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:15:09 +0200
Subject: AW: [rt-users] Priority ?
Message-ID:
From B.Toonk at zx.nl Tue Jul 10 17:12:39 2001
From: B.Toonk at zx.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:12:39 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] priority ?
Message-ID: <004a01c10985$0d27d860$0e00a8c0@bloodhound.dhs.org>
Hi,
How does Priority works ?
What is it exactly ?
has it something to do with Due ?
I have a created a queue with a due in 5 days.
But wat can i do with priority ?
PS: Great application!!!
-Bas Toonk
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Tue Jul 10 17:16:54 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:16:54 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] Mail Problem
Message-ID:
Hi
I sucessfully installed WebRT and can also use the Web UI, however, when
sending mails to it which get pulled down
via Fetchmail from an Exchange Server, the following error message appears
as a non-delivery report
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
The original message was received at Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:42:03 +0200 from
localhost with id f6AKg0I01292
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
"|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"
(reason: 13)
(expanded from: helpdesk-germany)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /opt/rt2/etc /opt/rt2/lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation
aborted at /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. Compilation failed in
require at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. BEGIN failed--compilation
aborted at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. 554 5.3.0
"|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"... unknown mailer
error 13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Any ideas ?
Thanks
Lars
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bas Toonk [mailto:Bas at Toonk.nl]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2001 22:49
An: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Betreff: [rt-users] Priority ?
Hi,
How does Priority works ?
What is it exactly ?
has it something to do with Due ?
I have a created a queue with a due in 5 days.
But wat can i do with priority ?
PS: Great application!!!
-Bas Toonk
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 17:30:51 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:30:51 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] [fwd] Re: Priority notes (from: jesse@fsck.com)
Message-ID: <20010710173051.D1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Luke said I could send this off to rt-users and I think it
explains a nice, rational way to use the priority system.
-j
----- Forwarded message from Jesse -----
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:06 -0400
From: Jesse
To: Luke Hankins
Subject: Re: Priority notes
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:09:48PM -0400, Luke Hankins wrote:
>This is mainly a description of what has worked for me in the past.
> - There are some tickets that will never get done. It's not reflection on
> the eptitude of the sysadmins, it's just that we'll never have enough
> time to do all the little things. As long as tasks are given the right
> priority, the right things will get done in the right order.
>
> - There are 5 levels of Priority:
> Low Minor annoyance, there is a workaround.
> Medium Some annoyance, there is a workaround.
> High Lots of annoyance, there is a workaround.
> Critical Something is partly broken or someone can't do
> part of their job. No workaround.
> Fatal Something is very broken or someone can't do
> any of their job. No workaround.
>
> - Priorities range from (making up numbers as an example, they can be
> anything) 1-30 for Low-High tickets 31-40 for Critical tickets
> and 40-50 for Fatal tickets. They start at the lowest number in the
> range and slowly grow to the max.
>
> - The on-call person is responsible for taking incoming tickets and
> gifting them with a priority, as well as setting the due dates,
> merging it with any existing tickets, etc. This must be done within
> a set time. (I've used 8 business hours to good effect.)
>
> - The on-call person is required to take a crack at all Critical and
> Fatal tickets that come in on his/her watch. If it's not within hir
> ken, it should be handed off to an able person.
>
> - The on-call person is _not_ responsible for any Low/Medium/High tickets
> that come in after they have been given a priority. By defintion,
> these tickets have a workaround and thus they can wait.
>
> - Everyone else is resposible for working their tickets in priority
> order and grabbing (or being given by management) more tickets
> when their queues get low.
>
> -Luke
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
After all, it's not every day you meet up with an evil power
-M. Bulgakov
----- End forwarded message -----
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
They'll take my private key when they pry it from my cold dead fingers!
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 21:01:58 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:01:58 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Mail Problem
In-Reply-To: ; from lleuchter@germany.ea.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:16:54PM +0200
References:
Message-ID: <20010710210158.I1998@pallas.fsck.com>
I'll bet fetchmail is clobbering the setgid bit on the rt-mailgate
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:16:54PM +0200, Leuchter, Lars wrote:
> Hi
>
> I sucessfully installed WebRT and can also use the Web UI, however, when
> sending mails to it which get pulled down
> via Fetchmail from an Exchange Server, the following error message appears
> as a non-delivery report
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------
> The original message was received at Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:42:03 +0200 from
> localhost with id f6AKg0I01292
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> "|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"
> (reason: 13)
> (expanded from: helpdesk-germany)
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /opt/rt2/etc /opt/rt2/lib
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
> /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation
> aborted at /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. Compilation failed in
> require at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. BEGIN failed--compilation
> aborted at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. 554 5.3.0
> "|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"... unknown mailer
> error 13
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------
>
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bas Toonk [mailto:Bas at Toonk.nl]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2001 22:49
> An: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> Betreff: [rt-users] Priority ?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> How does Priority works ?
> What is it exactly ?
>
> has it something to do with Due ?
> I have a created a queue with a due in 5 days.
> But wat can i do with priority ?
>
> PS: Great application!!!
>
> -Bas Toonk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
I'm reasonably sure that at least two of the electric blue kangeroos
I saw were real.
From jesse at fsck.com Tue Jul 10 21:03:55 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 21:03:55 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: <20010710125856.S1998@pallas.fsck.com>; from jesse@fsck.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:58:56PM -0400
References: <20010710123215.R1998@pallas.fsck.com> <20010710125856.S1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID: <20010710210355.J1998@pallas.fsck.com>
This should be fixed in RT 2.0.1-test3, which was released about 20 minutes
ago.
-j
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:58:56PM -0400, Jesse wrote:
>
> Ok. it looks like it's only searching for users who are watchers, as opposed
> to strings who are watchers. hrm. I'll have to think about the right way
> to fix that.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:54:42PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> >
> > Ok:
> >
> > i've search for 'SG': here it is:
> > SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
> > Users_2 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress LIKE '%SG%')) AND
> > ((Watchers_1.Scope = 'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type = 'Requestor')) AND
> > Watchers_1.Owner = Users_2.id AND main.id = Watchers_1.Value ORDER BY
> > main.id ASC
> >
> > looks good, what am I doing wrong ?
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> >
> > > That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
> > > What queries is RT generating against the database?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmmm,
> > > >
> > > > ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> > > > something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> > > > now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> > > > If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> > > > get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> > > > what can I do for getting this working ?
> > > > where do I have to start ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Roland
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > > > > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > > > > now)
> > > > >
> > > > > -j
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've a problem:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > > > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > > > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > line 215:
> > > > > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > > > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > > > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > > > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > > > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > > > > );
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > # }}}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > > > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > > > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > > > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Roland
> >
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
> to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
> than 10 seconds continuously."
> -Nathan Mehl
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
There are no supercomputer applications that are solvable that cannot be solved
in finite time using a fucking TRS-80 with approprite disk/tape drives. Zero.
-Tanj
From Gilles-Eric.Descamps at SiliconAccess.com Tue Jul 10 22:26:37 2001
From: Gilles-Eric.Descamps at SiliconAccess.com (Gilles-Eric Descamps)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:26:37 -0700
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 supports isolated web customers ?
Message-ID:
Hi,
We've been using RT-1.0.7 internally
and we're very happy with it
- although it lacks a limit on the display -
!!! Thanks a bunch !!!
We're considering using RT2 to support
our customers.
We would like to offer web & mail interface to our customers.
But customer A should not even suspect that B is a customer of us.
customer A should only be able to view his own tickets.
While internal staff should be able to see all customers
requests in one place.
Would RT2 support that ?
(RT1 lists the queue existence even if you don't have access to it)
How would you configure RT2 to support
multiple customers from several companies,
and isolate each client from each other ?
Thanks,
--
Gilles-Eric DESCAMPS
From phawley at ociweb.com Tue Jul 10 23:35:14 2001
From: phawley at ociweb.com (Patrick Hawley)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:35:14 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 supports isolated web customers ?
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Gilles-Eric Descamps wrote:
> We've been using RT-1.0.7 internally
> and we're very happy with it
> - although it lacks a limit on the display -
>
> !!! Thanks a bunch !!!
>
> We're considering using RT2 to support
> our customers.
> We would like to offer web & mail interface to our customers.
>
> But customer A should not even suspect that B is a customer of us.
> customer A should only be able to view his own tickets.
> While internal staff should be able to see all customers
> requests in one place.
>
> Would RT2 support that ?
> (RT1 lists the queue existence even if you don't have access to it)
>
> How would you configure RT2 to support
> multiple customers from several companies,
> and isolate each client from each other ?
This might not be the answer you want to hear, and obviously since we're
still using 1.0.7 and haven't looked at 2.x I've no idea what is possible
with 2.x, but we've had a similar need as you mention.
What we've done is bring up separate instances of rt, such that customer A
would go to:
http://customer-a.siliconaccess.com/customer-a/customer-a.cgi
and customer B would go to:
http://customer-b.siliconaccess.com/customer-b/customer-b.cgi
I've untarred the rt archive in to two places:
[path]/customer-a-rt/ and [path]/customer-b-rt/ and from within each of
those, editted each Makefile accordingly (changing the names of the
programs and cgis to be custom name for each customer
(customer-a-mailgate, customer-a-admin, etc. and customer-a.cgi, etc., and
installing them in different directories and even associating each
directory with its own VirtualHost in apache.
Then, when you create each instance (make install), you'll have two
separate entities, which (using .htaccess) allows for your employees to
use the same or existing web accounts to access each one.
This is just a late evening suggestion...if you'd like to know more
specifically what we've done, feel free to drop me a private email, and
I'll do my best to detail it tomorrow morning.
Patrick
From jesse at fsck.com Wed Jul 11 00:53:36 2001
From: jesse at fsck.com (Jesse)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:53:36 -0400
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 supports isolated web customers ?
In-Reply-To: ; from Gilles-Eric.Descamps@SiliconAccess.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:26:37PM -0700
References:
Message-ID: <20010711005336.M1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Are you mainly considering "customers" who are individuals or corporations
who will have multiple users interacting with RT?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:26:37PM -0700, Gilles-Eric Descamps wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been using RT-1.0.7 internally
> and we're very happy with it
> - although it lacks a limit on the display -
>
> !!! Thanks a bunch !!!
>
> We're considering using RT2 to support
> our customers.
> We would like to offer web & mail interface to our customers.
>
> But customer A should not even suspect that B is a customer of us.
> customer A should only be able to view his own tickets.
> While internal staff should be able to see all customers
> requests in one place.
>
> Would RT2 support that ?
> (RT1 lists the queue existence even if you don't have access to it)
>
> How would you configure RT2 to support
> multiple customers from several companies,
> and isolate each client from each other ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Gilles-Eric DESCAMPS
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
As I sit here alone looking at green text on a laptop in a mostly bare room listening
to loud music wearing all black, I realize that that it is much less cool in real life :)
--Richard Tibbetts
From lleuchter at germany.ea.com Wed Jul 11 02:17:31 2001
From: lleuchter at germany.ea.com (Leuchter, Lars)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:17:31 +0200
Subject: AW: [rt-users] Mail Problem
Message-ID:
I tried to send locally on the box to the recipient with the same result:
The original message was received at Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:15:28 +0200 from
root at localhost
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
"|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"
(reason: 13)
(expanded from: helpdesk-germany at localhost)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /opt/rt2/etc /opt/rt2/lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation
aborted at /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. Compilation failed in
require at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. BEGIN failed--compilation
aborted at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. 554 5.3.0
"|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"... unknown mailer
error 13
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jesse [mailto:jesse at fsck.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2001 03:02
An: Leuchter, Lars
Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Betreff: Re: [rt-users] Mail Problem
I'll bet fetchmail is clobbering the setgid bit on the rt-mailgate
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:16:54PM +0200, Leuchter, Lars wrote:
> Hi
>
> I sucessfully installed WebRT and can also use the Web UI, however,
> when sending mails to it which get pulled down via Fetchmail from an
> Exchange Server, the following error message appears as a non-delivery
> report
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> -----------------------------
> The original message was received at Tue, 10 Jul 2001 22:42:03 +0200 from
> localhost with id f6AKg0I01292
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> "|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"
> (reason: 13)
> (expanded from: helpdesk-germany)
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> Can't locate config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /opt/rt2/etc
> /opt/rt2/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0/i686-linux
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at
> /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. BEGIN failed--compilation
> aborted at /opt/rt2/lib/RT/Interface/Email.pm line 81. Compilation failed
in
> require at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. BEGIN failed--compilation
> aborted at /opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate line 18. 554 5.3.0
> "|/opt/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue EA --action correspond"... unknown
mailer
> error 13
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------
>
>
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bas Toonk [mailto:Bas at Toonk.nl]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Juli 2001 22:49
> An: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> Betreff: [rt-users] Priority ?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> How does Priority works ?
> What is it exactly ?
>
> has it something to do with Due ?
> I have a created a queue with a due in 5 days.
> But wat can i do with priority ?
>
> PS: Great application!!!
>
> -Bas Toonk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
--
jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
I'm reasonably sure that at least two of the electric blue
kangeroos
I saw were real.
From rherget at xebec.de Wed Jul 11 04:02:26 2001
From: rherget at xebec.de (Roland von Herget)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:02:26 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [rt-users] Web.pm: Limit requestor email
In-Reply-To: <20010710210355.J1998@pallas.fsck.com>
Message-ID:
Thanks a lot,
we will test it during the weekend...
Greetings,
Roland
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> This should be fixed in RT 2.0.1-test3, which was released about 20 minutes
> ago.
>
> -j
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:58:56PM -0400, Jesse wrote:
> >
> > Ok. it looks like it's only searching for users who are watchers, as opposed
> > to strings who are watchers. hrm. I'll have to think about the right way
> > to fix that.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:54:42PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok:
> > >
> > > i've search for 'SG': here it is:
> > > SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Tickets main, Watchers Watchers_1, Users
> > > Users_2 WHERE ((Users_2.EmailAddress LIKE '%SG%')) AND
> > > ((Watchers_1.Scope = 'Ticket')) AND ((Watchers_1.Type = 'Requestor')) AND
> > > Watchers_1.Owner = Users_2.id AND main.id = Watchers_1.Value ORDER BY
> > > main.id ASC
> > >
> > > looks good, what am I doing wrong ?
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > Roland
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> > >
> > > > That just doesn't sound right. do you have mysql logging turned on?
> > > > What queries is RT generating against the database?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmmm,
> > > > >
> > > > > ok than I have another problem, we create tickets via web UI and put
> > > > > something like 'aaaa bbbb xy-34232' into the requestors field.
> > > > > now I want to find this record, I know only 'bbbb'.
> > > > > If I type 'bbbb' into search after requestors email (using 'Contains'), I
> > > > > get no matches. (I also tried find '%bbbb%')
> > > > > what can I do for getting this working ?
> > > > > where do I have to start ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Roland
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Jesse wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The debug comment got pulled because there wasn't a bug in the code.
> > > > > > The UI was slightly misleading. That'll be fixed in 2.0.1 (It's fixed in CVS
> > > > > > now)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -j
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Roland von Herget wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've a problem:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > we are using rt-2.0.0 in production now and have the problem that we can't
> > > > > > > search for requestors emails via the Web interface:
> > > > > > > I found this in Web.pm:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > line 215:
> > > > > > > # {{{ Limit requestor email
> > > > > > > #TODO this doesn't work
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if ($args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'} ne '') {
> > > > > > > my $alias=$session{'tickets'}->LimitRequestor (
> > > > > > > VALUE => $args{ARGS}->{'ValueOfRequestor'},
> > > > > > > OPERATOR => $args{ARGS}->{'RequestorOp'},
> > > > > > > );
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > # }}}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok the TODO: line tells all I think.
> > > > > > > In the current cvs version this TODO line isn't there any longer, but I
> > > > > > > can't find any related fixes in the current cvs version.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does this work in the cvs version ?
> > > > > > > Which fixes do I have to apply to rt-2.0.0 for fixing it ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Roland
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> > 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
> >
> > A REAL sysadmin challenge is "resurrect five dead mailserver while so ripped
> > to the gills on mdma that you can't focus on any given line of text for more
> > than 10 seconds continuously."
> > -Nathan Mehl
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> There are no supercomputer applications that are solvable that cannot be solved
> in finite time using a fucking TRS-80 with approprite disk/tape drives. Zero.
> -Tanj
>
From B.Toonk at zx.nl Wed Jul 11 04:27:24 2001
From: B.Toonk at zx.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:27:24 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] {$Transaction->OldValue}
Message-ID: <01071110272402.00230@bas>
Hi,
I've made a OnOwnerChange condition script.
That works but now ik have to make a template.
I want the New owners realname in it: {$Ticket->OwnerObj->RealName}
That works fine.
But i also want the old owners realname in it.
But i dont know how to do it.
I have the user id {$Transaction->OldValue}
But how do i get his realname ??
Bas Toonk!
From B.Toonk at zx.nl Wed Jul 11 04:48:05 2001
From: B.Toonk at zx.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:48:05 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] {$Transaction->OldValue}
In-Reply-To: <3B4C11AB.B801404B@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <01071110272402.00230@bas> <3B4C11AB.B801404B@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <01071110480503.00230@bas>
Ofcource.
Tell me were i can send it to.
But doe you have an answer to my question ?
Bas!
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 10:43, Greg Cope wrote:
> Bas Toonk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've made a OnOwnerChange condition script.
> > That works but now ik have to make a template.
> >
> > I want the New owners realname in it: {$Ticket->OwnerObj->RealName}
> > That works fine.
> >
> > But i also want the old owners realname in it.
> > But i dont know how to do it.
> > I have the user id {$Transaction->OldValue}
> >
> > But how do i get his realname ??
> >
> > Bas Toonk!
>
> Could you share this with us, as I need something like this and would
> appreciate any help.
>
> Jesse, if Bas is forcomming could this be applied to CVS ?
>
> Greg
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
--
Mvg. Bas Toonk
Kennisnet Beheer
From B.Toonk at zx.nl Wed Jul 11 05:15:02 2001
From: B.Toonk at zx.nl (Bas Toonk)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:15:02 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] {$Transaction->OldValue}
In-Reply-To: <3B4C17C2.B3343BE6@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <01071110272402.00230@bas> <01071110480503.00230@bas> <3B4C17C2.B3343BE6@rubberplant.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <01071111150204.00230@bas>
Oke here it is!
Bas Toonk!
On Wednesday 11 July 2001 11:09, you wrote:
> Bas Toonk wrote:
> > Ofcource.
> >
> > Tell me were i can send it to.
>
> email to my address, and if its not long to the list (or post a URL to
> the list of where it can be found)?
>
> > But doe you have an answer to my question ?
>
> Sorry No!
>
> > Bas!
--
Mvg. Bas Toonk
Kennisnet Beheer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: insert_condition.pl
Type: application/x-perl
Size: 1735 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
-------------- next part --------------
# $Header: /raid/cvsroot/rt-addons/ScripConditions/OnOwnerChange/OwnerChange.pm,v 1.1 2001/06/17 19:18:36 jesse Exp $
# Copyright 1996-2001 Jesse Vincent
# Released under the terms of the GNU General Public License
# OnOwnerChange Condition by Bas Toonk (B.Toonk at zx.nl);
# This a a copy form the OnQueueChange script!
package RT::Condition::OwnerChange;
require RT::Condition::Generic;
@ISA = qw(RT::Condition::Generic);
=head2 IsApplicable
If the queue is being changed, return true
=cut
sub IsApplicable {
my $self = shift;
if ($self->TransactionObj->Field eq 'Owner') {
return(1);
}
else {
return(undef);
}
}
1;
From hanson at netlife.de Wed Jul 11 05:19:06 2001
From: hanson at netlife.de (hanson at netlife.de)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:19:06 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] RT2 supports isolated web customers ?
Message-ID:
> What we've done is bring up separate instances of rt ...
We've done something similar, also using a modified 1.0.7. We're not using
virtual hosts (since we run the web server under SSL), but have several
instances of RT installed in separate directories:
https://rt.netlife.de/project1
https://rt.netlife.de/project2
etc.
I've soft-linked the various rt/lib directories to a single location, so
that I can easily apply code changes to all instances.
A disadvantage of this approach is that our internal users who work with
several customers do not have a single overview of all requests. They have
to call up the overview page for each customer separately.
Scott Hanson
----
Webmaster
Netlife GmbH
Millerntorplatz 1
20359 Hamburg, Germany
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
From bernd.schmidt at ponton.de Wed Jul 11 05:31:36 2001
From: bernd.schmidt at ponton.de (Bernd Schmidt)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:31:36 +0200
Subject: [rt-users] "comment aliases require a TicketId"
Message-ID:
Hello,
after installing rt2 on SUSE 7.2 i get the following
errormessage:
----snip
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal
errors -----
"|/usr/local/rt2/bin/rt-mailgate --queue general --action
comment"
(reason: 255)
(expanded from: