[rt-users] correspondence to requestor/adminccc

[Feargal Reilly]

This is actually a *feature*.

The basic rule that RT follows is to never send an email to an actor.
This is because a) you already know about it, so you don't need notification,
and b) you don't need a copy for your archives because, hey, RT is your archive.

After all, why would a at dom.com want a copy bounced back to him every time he does something?

If you still thought it neccessary, I'm sure you could write a scrip to do this.

-Feargal.

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:40:46 +0200
"Adriaan Peeters" <apeeters at pi.be> wrote:

> Hey all,
> 
> There seems to be a bug in RT 2.0.2 (i also tried 2.0.4).
> When the requestor is one of the AdminCC users, he doesn't get any mail that
> goes to other AdminCC users...
> 
> aIs there an option to be able to receive your own transactions via mail ?
> 
> Suppose we have a at dom.com and b at dom.com as AdminCC users.  When a at dom.com
> sends a reply/comment... he does't get mail from it, but b at dom.com does,  is
> there a way to change this ?
> 
> Thanks !
> Adriaan Peeters
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 


-- 
Feargal Reilly,
Systems Administrator,
The CIA.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20010727/c6954b7d/attachment.sig>