[rt-users] Re: [rt-devel] Stable RT2 Version?

[Joshua Sun]

Ooops, then it's something I didn't configure correctly then.  I'll try again.  I install RT2 twice, the
first time I got some segmentation faults.  So I reinstall it again, now it won't work at all.  Of
course I didn't spend enough time on it.  I'll work on it more before I ask again.  Thanks for the quick
response.  By the way, RT is a great tool, we use it here everyday.  Thanks for the great work!

Josh
Excite Operation

Jesse wrote:

> Joshua,
>     Being the developer, I tend to run whatever the latest snapshot
>     release is.  Right now, fsck.com/rt2/ is running something
>     in the 1.3.101-1.3.102 timeframe.  What sorts of bugs have you been seeing?
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:33:12AM -0700, Joshua Sun wrote:
> > Hi all, anyone know which RT2 version are stable to use.  I have install the RT2 from CVS but it's
> > pretty unstable.  The one on the net to track the the buglist seems pretty good, can you tell me
> > which version you are running there?
> >
> >     http://fsck.com/rt2/
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Joshua Sun
> > Excite at Home
> > 650-556-2850 / jsun at excitecorp.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rt-devel mailing list
> > Rt-devel at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-devel
> >
>
> --
> jesse reed vincent -- root at eruditorum.org -- jesse at fsck.com
> 70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90
>
> IP networks were intended to survive nuclear attack, but 12 year old
> kids with PCs were not part of the threat model.   -- mycroft