[rt-users] Bad SMTP headers - 2nd try

[Phil Oester]

Well, investigated, and some of the templates didn't have returns after
the subject.  So...changed them, and will watch this to see if it
is...er...resolved.

Thanks,

-Phil Oester

-----Original Message-----
From: hsinclai at speakeasy.net [mailto:hsinclai at speakeasy.net] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:46 PM
To: Jesse Vincent
Cc: Phil Oester; rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Bad SMTP headers - 2nd try


I experienced the same bad_RFC822_field_name message before.

IIRC, it was bad template-editing on my part.
I did not leave a blank line after the first Subject: line in some of
the templates, probably during a caffeine-less configuration streak, and
after fixing it I think the problem went away..  



On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 22:34:44 -0400, Jesse Vincent
<jesse at bestpractical.com> wrote:

> I'd very much like to see what's in the rt.log files for the processes
> that generated these.  Alternatively, feeding the messages to
rt-mailgate by
> hand in a shell will get you better errors too.  I'm betting something
> bogus in your templates.

 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 07:28:39PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> > Well, seems my poor choice of examples to send convinced everyone it
was
> > a virus sending these messages.  Here are some other
thoughtfully-chosen
> > examples to dispel that myth:
> > 
> > @400000003bb47c8835951c14 delivery 292904: success:
> >
Bad_RFC822_field_name_'Akira_-_Please_Change_The_Crontab_On_All_The_web_
> >
Hosts_To_Run_This_Daily'/_at_/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Template.pm_line_255/did_0+
> > 0+1/
> > 
> > @400000003bb4ce40227cc604 delivery 293389: success:
> >
Bad_RFC822_field_name_'Please_Qa_Tropicana'S_Flash_Banners.__There_Are_T
> >
wo_468x60_And_Two_120x600'/_at_/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Template.pm_line_255/did_
> > 0+0+1/
> > 
> > @400000003bb4f7f63494e254 delivery 293462: success:
> >
Bad_RFC822_field_name_'Please_Add_To_The_Nt_Queue_And_Assign_To_Andrew.'
> > /_at_/opt/rt2/lib/RT/Template.pm_line_255/did_0+0+1/
> > 
> > As you can see - these are not virus related.  Now...anyone have any
> > thoughts?
> > 
> > -Phil Oester
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > rt-users mailing list
> > rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> > http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> > 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.bestpractical.com/products/rt  -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users