[rt-users] postgres vs mysql
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Wed Oct 9 12:07:41 EDT 2002
>
> Two major reasons:
> 2) Postgres can't handle embedded nulls in binary objects, so RT has to
> muck about with base 64 encoding in some cases, which is slow.
Couldn't. Now that DBD::Pg supports bytea types properly, this is no
longer the case. It should be changed for 3.0.
>
> There's something else to do with case sensitivity but I can't remember it.
By default, mysql isn't case sensitive, postgresql is.
> --
> If the code and the comments disagree, then both are probably wrong.
> -- Norm Schryer
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
--
»|« http://www.bestpractical.com/rt -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
More information about the rt-users
mailing list