[rt-users] Re: BUG in rt2->rt3 conversion re: keywords
Jesse Vincent
jesse at bestpractical.com
Mon Apr 14 16:11:03 EDT 2003
Does it _also_ create the global custom fields?
The right place to fix this is in the import/export tools, not by making
you do nasty things after the fact.
-j
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 04:07:27PM -0400, Nicolae P. Costescu wrote:
> I was able to straighten the keywords out with a lot of SQL gymnastics.
> Basically I had to create new CustomFields, then new CustomFieldValues,
> then map all the customfields from the TicketCustomFieldValues to the new
> CustomFields. Then I disabled the queue specific custom fields for every
> queue except 0 (global), except for the queues that really were supposed to
> have queue specific custom fields (whew).
>
> Now I'm left with a bunch of duplicate custom fields, and I'm finding it
> hard to remove duplicates with mysql's limitations (no views,no functions,
> no subselects). So I'm writing a C program to do it. I thought about
> importing the table into postgres and doing it there...
>
> Remember - the issue is not that you can't keep keywords when moving from
> queue to queue.
>
> The issue is that the rt2->rt3 upgrade script takes your global keywords
> from rt2 and replicates them as queue specific keywords in every queue in
> rt3!
>
> Ouch.
>
> At 03:36 PM 4/14/2003 -0400, Alexander Dupuy wrote:
> >Nicolae P. Costescu wrote:
> >>In my rt2 database I had only global keywords.
> >>In my rt3 database they are now queue specific, and exist in every queue.
> >>So when we move tickets from one queue to another they lose the keyword
> >>settings (though the keyword selection lists are there because the
> >>conversion program created them in every queue).
> >>Is there any way to fix this now that I have those custom fields/keywords
> >>in every queue instead of globally?
> >
> >I too would be interested in knowing if there is a way to keep keyword
> >values when moving tickets from queue to queue in rt3. Our workflow
> >is quite dependent on moving tickets, and we are using keywords heavily,
> >so it would be kind of a showstopper for us if there's no way to do this
> >with rt3.
> >
> >There's at least one other RT user who also feels this way -- his was the
> >only reply when I asked about this problem last November
> >(http://lists.fsck.com/pipermail/rt-users/2002-November/010685.html) --
> >but nobody provided any pointers on how to preserve the keyword values.
> >
> >@alex
> >--
> >mailto:dupuy at sysd.com
> >
>
> ****************************************************
> Nicolae P. Costescu, Ph.D. / Senior Developer
> Stronghold Technologies
> 46040 Center Oak Plaza, Suite 160 / Sterling, Va 20166
> Tel: 571-434-1472 / Fax: 571-434-1478
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
--
http://www.bestpractical.com/rt -- Trouble Ticketing. Free.
More information about the rt-users
mailing list