You can add another "me too" in there...
Jonathan Kaufman
To: "'Mick Szucs'" <mick at onramp.ca>, John Gedeon <jgedeon at qualcomm.com>
cc: "'rt-users at lists.fsck.com'" <rt-users at lists.fsck.com>
"Gororo, Subject: RE: [rt-users] FastCGI vs. mod_perl (not mod_ssl)
Hillary"
<HGororo at charter
com.com>
Sent by:
rt-users-admin at l
ists.fsck.com
04/29/2003 12:50
PM
I am also very interested in learning whether there are any performance /
speed advantages in using FastCGI instead of mod_perl with RT2 or RT3.
Thanks
Hillary
-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Szucs [mailto:mick at onramp.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 12:44 PM
To: John Gedeon
Cc: 'rt-users at lists.fsck.com'
Subject: Re: [rt-users] FastCGI vs. mod_perl (not mod_ssl)
On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 13:36, John Gedeon wrote:
> >Can anyone tell me (from their own experience or otherwise) whether or
> >not there is a noticeable performance difference between running RT
> >under FastCGI vs mod_ssl?
>
> mod_ssl doesn't run cgi programs it is for running a secure web server
>
> ie if you wanted to use RT on an ssl aware apache server you would have
to
> have both
> FastCGI and mod_ssl.
>
> I think you may be thinking of mod_perl not mod_ssl.
Right .. mod_perl. Sorry 'bout that folks, hadn't consumed the
appropriate amount of caffeine prior to posting :)
Thanks,
Mick
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm