[rt-users] Which is better for Apache 2, mod_perl or fastcgi?

[Scott Hebert]

Hi,

I've been using RT3 with Apache 2.0.43 and FastCGI with great results.

SH

-----Original Message-----
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:khera at kcilink.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:55 AM
To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Which is better for Apache 2, mod_perl or
fastcgi?


>>>>> "J" == JChen  <JChen at paymentone.com> writes:

J> Before I try to compile fastcgi with apache 2, I am wondering if I
J> should give mod_perl a chance.  The reason I'm tilting toward
J> fastcgi is because I've read that mod_perl 1 and 2 does not work
J> well with RT 3.
 
J> So should I go ahead with fastcgi?

RT takes no advantage of the mod_perl API so there is no advantage
using it over either fastcgi or speedycgi/persistentperl.  Personally,
I run RT3 under SpeedyCGI with good result so far.
_______________________________________________
rt-users mailing list
rt-users at lists.fsck.com
http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users

Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm