[rt-users] Does Postgres offer acceptable performance

[Larry Rosenman]

--On Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:15:36 -0600 Jim Rowan 
<jim.rowan at starcore-dsp.com> wrote:

>>
>> http://fsck.com/rtfm/factoid.html?id=94
>>
>> "PostgresSQL v7.1.1 or higher, but NOT 7.3.0 or higher"
>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I'm certain that was written for RT2, some time ago, and does not apply
> to RT3.  If you do the "show article in context" it talks about perl
> 5.005 or newer.
>
> 7.3.4 works fine for us.  I'm about to upgrade to 7.4 (or 7.4.1,
> depending on when I a round tuit).
I can confirm RT is quite happy with 7.4 of PostgreSQL.

LER

> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>



-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler at lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-users/attachments/20031211/fa33a322/attachment.sig>