[rt-users] Performance of RT 3.02

[Matthew Barr]

I can attest to RT 3.02 on RH 9, w/ Postgres being slow..  it's usable, 
but we are just testiing it out.  I'm glad to hear there are speed 
improvements in the newer versions..

As a new user, I didn't want to try to set up a pre release package 
while still learning how the default install works.


Is MySQL any better with speed?


Matthew


On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 04:00  PM, Mick Szucs wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:39, jennyw wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
>>> At least with PostgresQL as database it'll be way to slow. Don't know
>>> about other backends. AFAIK speed enhancements are still work in
>>> progress. I've got about 5000 tickets in the database and have to 
>>> wait
>>> up to a minute for certain pages to load.
>>
>> Yikes! I'm using MySQL.  So is 3.02 not ready for prime time? Should 
>> I have
>> installed RT 2.x instead?
>
> We ditched our RT 2.0.9 installation on Postgres for 3.0.3pre3 on 
> MySQL,
> more than 16,000 tickets, speed is not an issue, everything is at least
> reasonably fast.
>
> It's just great software.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Mick
>
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm
>
--------------------------------
Matthew Barr
mbarr at mbarr.net
Managing Partner
Datalyte Consulting, LLC.
(646) 765-6878    (cell)