[rt-users] Recommended configuration for a stable working RT3 deployment

[Marshall, Darren]

Harald,

Thanks for the info, I will maybe try Debian unstable, anyone else have any recommendations?.

Cheers Darren

-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Wagener [mailto:hwagener at hamburg.fcb.com]
Sent: 25 November 2003 09:47
To: Marshall, Darren
Cc: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Recommended configuration for a stable working
RT3 deployment



Am 24.11.2003 um 17:19 schrieb Marshall, Darren:

> Hi,
>
> I'm currently evaluating RT3 (3.0.5) on a server running Redhat 9 and 
> am experiencing problems with attachments and occasional Storable.xs 
> errors.
>
> My question is -
>
> What would be the recommended software configuration for running a 
> stable, fully functional RT3 deployment based on Linux?.

RedHat 9 has a recorded history of having the 'wrong' versions of some 
packages, which have bugs that render RT3 problematic.

People have been running RT3 on RedHat8, tweaked RedHat9, BSD, and 
debian boxen, AFAIR. There are also instructions available for 
instaling it onto a MacOSX Server.

Basically, the idea is to stay away from mod_perl2, as it is not 
released yet, and updating the perl modules needed by RT.

There are RT3 packages available for debian testing/unstable, I can't 
recall from the top of my head if there is also a backport to stable. 
We had great success using debian/unstable over here.

Regards,
     Harald


________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
http://www.citc.it

___

________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
http://www.citc.it

___