[rt-users] Re: Recommended configuration for a stable working RT3deployment

[Alex Soares de Moura]

Also, the ports system in FreeBSD can alleviate the burden
in installing most of the RT dependencies, including RT itself,
with very few commands. In theory, just a "cd /usr/ports && make install rt3"
downloads and installs everything needed.

Alex

Jim Rowan wrote:
> I'll second that.  I have been watching all the noise on the list about
> RH, (seems like particularly RH9) but didn't want to fan the OS wars
> flame.  Our experience with FreeBSD 4.8 (now 4.9) and Postgres 7.3 has
> been extremely smooth and stable.  We're currently on 3.06.
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: bill at daze.net [mailto:bill at daze.net] 
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 10:58 AM
>>To: rt-users at lists.fsck.com
>>Subject: [rt-users] Re: Recommended configuration for a 
>>stable working RT3deployment 
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for the info, I will maybe try Debian unstable, anyone else 
>>>have any recommendations?.
>>
>>I didn't reply the first time around because it's not Linux, 
>>however FreeBSD is a very stable environment for running RT.  
>>We are in our fourth year of using RT (started with v1 now 
>>using v3) on FreeBSD and I would do it all over again. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rt-users mailing list
> rt-users at lists.fsck.com
> http://lists.fsck.com/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
> 
> Have you read the FAQ? The RT FAQ Manager lives at http://fsck.com/rtfm